Obama gives Interpol free hand in U.S.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

12-30-2009, 07:36 AM

emptyquiver2

Nontypical Buck

Thread Starter

Join Date: Apr 2009

Location: N.Y.

Posts: 1,204

Obama gives Interpol free hand in U.S.

Wahington Examiner ^

12-30-2009, 08:14 AM

ipscshooter

Boone & Crockett

Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: The Republic of Texas

Posts: 11,483

By ceding part of our sovereignty, he is now a traitor.

12-30-2009, 08:52 AM

kevin1

Dominant Buck

Join Date: May 2003

Location: Ramsey , Indiana

Posts: 22,545

Quote:

As National Review Online's Andy McCarthy put it, the White House must answer these questions: Why should we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files that will be beyond the scrutiny of Congress, American law enforcement, the media, and the American people?

If this isn't grounds for impeachment then I surely don't know what could be. I'm also very curious to know why US law enforcement isn't enraged and beating down the doors of the SCOTUS over this, after all it virtually emasculates them. Up until now they've all enjoyed a lovey dovey relationship with Interpol, now they're subservient to it in every sense of the word and cut off from whatever Interpol chooses not to share. The lack of outcry is deafening.

12-30-2009, 09:38 AM

jeepkid

Giant Nontypical

Join Date: Mar 2006

Location: ****ifornia

Posts: 5,049

I don't think impeachment can come quick enough!!

12-30-2009, 10:38 AM

Griswold

Nontypical Buck

Join Date: Mar 2008

Location: South of Mason-Dixon

Posts: 1,395

I'm not a legal scholar, so I have held off on making rash judgments about this move by the administration. However, it does have the potential to be the most alarming measure taken by this administration thus far...and, yet, no one is talking about it. Why?

12-30-2009, 10:56 AM

Wub

Typical Buck

Join Date: Aug 2009

Location: SW Ohio

Posts: 655

This is scary stuff. Like Gris, I'm no legal scholar, but this just doesn't seem right. Can anyone come up with a rationalization for this; even a fictional rationalization that sounds good?