Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics
 ? for the Dems out there >

? for the Dems out there

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

? for the Dems out there

Old 04-02-2008, 05:10 AM
  #1  
Dominant Buck
Thread Starter
 
Fieldmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 36,544
Default ? for the Dems out there

Does it bother you at all with the constant hypocrital stance your party has taken over the years? In 2000 it was count all the votes except for the military serviceman from overseas. To this year where they punish Mi and Fl for moving their primaries to far up and they say to them your vote doesn't count. Today, they are trying to preasure Hillary to drop out when it's neck and neck so the 10 remaining state's votes won't count now? Then the icing on the cake, it will be decided by the party elite's so everyone's vote doesn't count.

For the rest of you, do you really want to turn your health insurance over to such idiots?
Fieldmouse is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 05:19 AM
  #2  
Dominant Buck
 
kevin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsey , Indiana
Posts: 22,545
Default RE: ? for the Dems out there

The silence is deafening...
kevin1 is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 05:36 AM
  #3  
 
Sureisaniceskimask's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Flowery Branch, GA
Posts: 848
Default RE: ? for the Dems out there

HA! There aren't many libs in here, but for the ones that are what could they possibly say to that.
Sureisaniceskimask is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 06:05 AM
  #4  
Boone & Crockett
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Comance county, OK
Posts: 11,369
Default RE: ? for the Dems out there

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
falcon is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 06:37 AM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WV
Posts: 4,484
Default RE: ? for the Dems out there

Does it bother you at all with the constant hypocrital stance your party has taken over the years?
I'll bet it doesn't bother them anymore then it bothers republicans in regards to their own party. Some are blind (by their own choice)no matter what side of the aisle they sit on
hillbillyhunter1 is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 07:18 AM
  #6  
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 11,336
Default RE: ? for the Dems out there

Don't expect any answers to specific questions. All that the Democrat group can come up with are a bunch of inane platitudes about "hope" and "change"...

I've been trying to get an answer to this question for quite a while:

I'm not quite sure how he managed to support the tax rebate/economic incentive plan on the basis that the tax relief was needed in order to stimulate an economy that's teetering on the brink of a recession, yet, he intends, with the remainder of his ilk in Congress, to inflict upon us the biggest tax increase since taxes were imposed. How does he propose that the relief program was necessary to stimulate the economy, yet, somehow by magic or alchemy, the economy will still thrive when he imposes taxes vastly, gigantically, enormously in excess of the very relief he says is needed now... Anyone who buys that load of BS is not paying attention.

Come on, wahoo... I know you're on line. Please explain how the tax relief is necessary to stimulate the economy, but the tax hikes, greatly in excess of the tax relief, won't reverse the impact of that relief and throw us into a recession.

I've asked it two or three times in this thread, as well as numerous times in other threads, yet none of the Socialists care to explain Obama's position. How does he square his belief that the tax rebate/stimulus package is necessary to help our struggling economy, yet he does not intend to push for renewal of the Bush tax cuts, thus resulting in a massive tax increase that will be vastly larger than the rebate package? Why is one necessary to help the economy, yet the other, immensely larger, won't hurt the economy at all?
I will accept an explanation from an esteemed member of the Democrat Party...

I just cannot resolve the inconsistency between "The economy is tanking and is going to crash, so, here's a dollar today to help the economy... Oh... By the way, tomorrow, you have to give me twenty dollars... but don't worry, that won't hurt the economy."
Still no takers. And, if you cannot come up with a reasonable answer to that question, then it is beyond idiocy to vote for the candidate.
ipscshooter is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 09:57 AM
  #7  
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 11,336
Default RE: ? for the Dems out there

Come on Democrats, how about it? Why will you not answer this fundamental question?

Here's another one. You guys always rail against Bush's "Tax Cuts for the Wealthy". Yet, revenues are at an all time high after the tax cuts AND the percentage of income taxes paid by the wealthiest 10% is greater than it was before the tax cuts. And, your party wants to raise taxes on everyone making over $31,800 by an average of about $1,800 each. PLEASE EXPLAIN.
ipscshooter is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 10:26 AM
  #8  
Boone & Crockett
 
Charlie P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,137
Default RE: ? for the Dems out there

How many dems post here three or four?
Charlie P is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 10:40 AM
  #9  
Dominant Buck
Thread Starter
 
Fieldmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 36,544
Default RE: ? for the Dems out there

ORIGINAL: Charlie P

How many dems post here three or four?
Maybe a little more that are out of the closet. However,there are a few here that will deny it to the end.Their views and positions on the issues speak volumes as to their true allegiance.
Fieldmouse is offline  
Old 04-02-2008, 10:42 AM
  #10  
Boone & Crockett
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Comance county, OK
Posts: 11,369
Default RE: ? for the Dems out there

"Yet, revenues are at an all time high after the tax cuts AND the percentage of income taxes paid by the wealthiest 10% is greater than it was before the tax cuts."


Yep, it was a tax bonanza.Why is the national debt three trillion dollars higher than it was in 2000?[:@][:@]

falcon is offline  

Quick Reply: ? for the Dems out there


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.