Vortex
11-19-2015, 02:41 PM
#1
Spike
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 26
Vortex
I realize everyone has their own preference, but I have recently started switching all my optics to Vortex.
For the money, I just don't know of another brand out there that can compare. They are some of the best glass you can get. But what makes them head and shoulders above the rest is the VIP warranty. No matter what the reason is for damage, they will fix or replace them for free. Run over them with the truck? Free replacement. Wife drops them out of the tree stand? Free replacement.
Just some info I'd thought I'd share with some hunting friends.
For the money, I just don't know of another brand out there that can compare. They are some of the best glass you can get. But what makes them head and shoulders above the rest is the VIP warranty. No matter what the reason is for damage, they will fix or replace them for free. Run over them with the truck? Free replacement. Wife drops them out of the tree stand? Free replacement.
Just some info I'd thought I'd share with some hunting friends.
11-28-2015, 02:25 AM
#3
Typical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 538
Initially this was my concern, still is to a point. Everyone always says how great the warranty is, doesn't really matter if the company is gone. They are gaining a loyal following and are making pretty good products at their price points. I bought a cheaper Vortex for a 22, good product for the money. Will look at them harder in the future.
11-30-2015, 09:23 AM
#4
Fork Horn
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 153
I don't think the glass (dollar for dollar) is near as good or as clear as Leupold NIkon or Zeiss in the same price range. Sure you can jump up to the Viper Line and get some good Optics but then you are over paying for what you are getting compared to those companies.
The Diamond Back Series is basically on par with Bushnells entry level glass the Banner series and Simmons higher end series. Leupold Vari X1 will beat it and Vari X11 will blow it out of the water. Nikons entry level Buckmaster is a huge improvement and priced about the same. Redfield's offerings IMHO give it a good run for the money. I just don't see why everyone says its the best value for your money when the glass is not all that great. Sure the warranty is good. But so is Leupold, and Redfield.
The Diamond Back Series is basically on par with Bushnells entry level glass the Banner series and Simmons higher end series. Leupold Vari X1 will beat it and Vari X11 will blow it out of the water. Nikons entry level Buckmaster is a huge improvement and priced about the same. Redfield's offerings IMHO give it a good run for the money. I just don't see why everyone says its the best value for your money when the glass is not all that great. Sure the warranty is good. But so is Leupold, and Redfield.
11-30-2015, 11:23 PM
#6
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,695
I saw this post and thought, well, I am a Nikon fan and have been for years now. Matter of fact, every single one of my weapons wearing glass wears a Nikon product. BUT I am a big fan of giving companies a look if they offer me value in a product as well as quality. So, over the weekend I made my usual little trip to Cabelas for some x-mas looking. Looked through a few scopes then did me a little comparing. 3-9x40 Prostaff for $179 vs. 3-9x40 Diamondback for $199.....Results as far as clarity and light?? Not even close!!! Nikon won that one hands down. Vortex wasn't even in the same league. So, to give them a fair shake I picked up the new Diamondback HD 3-12x42 that sells for $389. It was about the same as the cheaper Nikon!!! Maybe a smidge brighter but certainly not $210 brighter! Conclusion, if their top end scopes can't match wits with another makers cheapest line then I honestly can't see them staying in business for much longer. I didn't even bother to compare the Monarchs to the Razor. A warranty means absolutely nothing to me if the quality of the product sucks wind to begin with.
12-01-2015, 10:45 AM
#7
Fork Horn
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 153
I saw this post and thought, well, I am a Nikon fan and have been for years now. Matter of fact, every single one of my weapons wearing glass wears a Nikon product. BUT I am a big fan of giving companies a look if they offer me value in a product as well as quality. So, over the weekend I made my usual little trip to Cabelas for some x-mas looking. Looked through a few scopes then did me a little comparing. 3-9x40 Prostaff for $179 vs. 3-9x40 Diamondback for $199.....Results as far as clarity and light?? Not even close!!! Nikon won that one hands down. Vortex wasn't even in the same league. So, to give them a fair shake I picked up the new Diamondback HD 3-12x42 that sells for $389. It was about the same as the cheaper Nikon!!! Maybe a smidge brighter but certainly not $210 brighter! Conclusion, if their top end scopes can't match wits with another makers cheapest line then I honestly can't see them staying in business for much longer. I didn't even bother to compare the Monarchs to the Razor. A warranty means absolutely nothing to me if the quality of the product sucks wind to begin with.
08-15-2016, 09:02 PM
#8
Spike
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13
I like the vortex line but am more of a Nikon guy as some other members stated. I like the Vortex line for AR rifles like their spitfire, but prefer Nikon for my hunting rifles. They are definately a company to keep an eye on though.
