Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Outdoor Gear > Optics
Good quality binos >

Good quality binos

Optics Quality optics are a must-have for any serious hunter. Discuss them here.

Good quality binos

Old 01-21-2015, 06:36 PM
  #11  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 153
Default

There are some good quality optics out there in that price range.

While I agree that Swarovski makes a great set of binos. I doubt I will ever buy another set at the nearly 2 k price tags. The difference in a $600 Hd Leupold and a 2k Swarovski is marginal and probably only going to serve a true bird watcher well.

The Clarity on the Mckinley's is superb and backed by Leupolds excellent warrany and customer service. I have some cheaper Binos that are darn close to the Mckinley's but for most big game applications the advantages are mainly in eye strain for extreame periods of glassing,
miketodd58 is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 06:28 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: idaho
Posts: 2,773
Default

Originally Posted by miketodd58 View Post
There are some good quality optics out there in that price range.

While I agree that Swarovski makes a great set of binos. I doubt I will ever buy another set at the nearly 2 k price tags. The difference in a $600 Hd Leupold and a 2k Swarovski is marginal and probably only going to serve a true bird watcher well.

The Clarity on the Mckinley's is superb and backed by Leupolds excellent warrany and customer service. I have some cheaper Binos that are darn close to the Mckinley's but for most big game applications the advantages are mainly in eye strain for extreame periods of glassing,
mike makes a good point it really comes down to what and how much you're going to use them for. if you glass a lot in the half light of dusk and dawn ,you will want a pair that draws in and magnifys light well.
you will also see huge difference in binos in first and last light scenarios.these are also the times you tend to see the big boys,so if you're a trophy hunter
( or at least wanting the chance at a big one)it's worth the money . if you plan on spanking down first animal you see, it probly is not

Last edited by kidoggy; 01-22-2015 at 06:32 AM.
kidoggy is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 06:37 AM
  #13  
Nontypical Buck
 
Big Uncle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,780
Default

I normally carry Swarovski binoculars. However, I also own a pair of McKinleys. They are very close in optical quality to my eyes.

The biggest differences are the extra weight of the McKinleys (not always a bad thing), and the price. Swarovski binoculars cost about four times the price of the McKinleys.
Big Uncle is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 06:40 AM
  #14  
Typical Buck
 
Murdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: North Central Illinois
Posts: 848
Default

Here's a decent review of 3 in that approximate price range:
http://www.opticsreviewer.com/monarc...-elite-ed.html
The Nikon Monarch 7's fair well.
Murdy is offline  
Old 01-23-2015, 06:54 PM
  #15  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 153
Default

Originally Posted by Murdy View Post
Here's a decent review of 3 in that approximate price range:
http://www.opticsreviewer.com/monarc...-elite-ed.html
The Nikon Monarch 7's fair well.
Not surprised the Nikons came out on top. I would not be surprised if the Nikon 5 would have come in close to those two other models,listed.

My vote is still for the McKinleys, Leupolds warranty definalty would be worth the extra $$$
miketodd58 is offline  
Old 07-03-2015, 06:43 AM
  #16  
Nontypical Buck
 
MudderChuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Germany/Calif.
Posts: 2,664
Default

A lot of it has to do with the coatings/filters. Sure the grind of the optics counts, but for my use, the coatings are more important. My eyes aren't all that good anyway, so clarity isn't nearly as important as usable light gathering.

I have a pair of (way old) Nikons, they have a fairly robust UV coating on the lens. In low light, a lot of what you see is reflected light, mostly UV (or near UV). Or objects that absorb UV (or near UV), you see a black nonrefective shape like Hogs. I call Hogs black holes, everything around them reflects a little, but true Boar don't reflect much light. The robust UV coating degrades some frequencies of low light. This may be more of a subjective than objective statement. What works for me may not work for you, in subtle sorts of ways.

My Nikons work OK in the daylight, I see much less with them at night or low light than I do with my Optolyth. I'm far from an expert, but did notice that the Nikons had a blue coating, wavelength unknown and my Optolyths have kind of a red or rust colored coating. On most of the optics the coatings are patented.

Both manufacturers are unlikely to sell you a pair of glasses that will burn out your retina, but do filter differently. One, the Optolyth, definitely works better in low light.

I got a heck of a deal on the Optolyth and they are comparable to the Swarovsky. I got a promotional deal for the Optolyth when they first started expanding into the U.S. market. Definitely a better optic, close to the best, whether they are worth the full price is anybodies guess and likely just opinion anyway.

Best advice, try them out extensively before you buy. The salespeople may or may not be open to you running outside with their wares, daylight and night time. I'd shop until I found a retailer that will allow you to test them. A relatively large ticket item, that is designed to last decades, is not a choice you want to make on the spur of the moment.

IMO every bodies eyes are little different and what works for me might not work as well for you. Again we are back to the coatings. I prefer a bino that lets in as much UV light as practical and safe.

Last edited by MudderChuck; 07-03-2015 at 06:50 AM.
MudderChuck is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 12:01 PM
  #17  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,186
Default

Take a look at the Meopta Meopro line. These are pretty darned good binos in the $400-$450 price range. I have a Swarovski SLC and Nikon Venturer, which are considered pretty much top of the line binos. The Meopta Meopro is darn clse at less than 1/2 the price.
Mojotex is offline  
Old 07-05-2015, 06:19 AM
  #18  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,970
Default

Vortex Razor HD for me. Either an 8X or 10X.
bugsNbows is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.