New scope
12-18-2013, 06:15 PM
#1
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 1,921
New scope
Just purchased a Tikka T3 Lite & need to outfit it w/ a good quality scope. I'm a big fan of the Leupold VX IIIs in 3.5-10x40 but wanted to see if there's another scope in a relatively comparable price range of $5-$600 that's just as good or better? I hear the Zeiss Conquests are pretty nice...
12-19-2013, 08:17 AM
#2
Fork Horn
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Northern Tennessee
Posts: 128
I happen to be a huge Leupold fan myself, owning over 20 at this time. I also own three Zeiss Conquests and they, to my eyes, are the brightest and clearest scopes I own. Now depending on what your needs are; range shooting, hunting, hunting in very low light ??, my suggestion would change.
It's tough, IMHO, to beat the Zeiss in it's price range. But even though it may be a bit brighter and sharper than similar priced leupold models, in my case wanting a hunting scope with the best low light performance I can find, I'd say to look very hard at the Leupold VX-R line-up. Nothing else I own comes close to the very low light performance of the two VX-Rs I own; one a Firedot #4 reticle and the other a Firedot Duplex. My 2nd best low light scopes, performance -wise are my two Leupold 30mm European models with #4 reticles (very similar to the newer VX-Rs).
Hunting in very low light has a lot to do with the reticle as well as the overall brightness of the scope, especially if aiming at a dark target such as a bear or hog in very low light. With less bold reticles, you can see your quarry, but lose the reticle on a dark colored target. With the VX-R that will not happen; simply said, if you can see your target, then you can get a well-aimed shot on it.
If extreme low light performance is not needed, I'd say to give the Zeiss a try. I've read of very few that don't consider the Zeiss the best value for your $$ and I am in agreement.
It's tough, IMHO, to beat the Zeiss in it's price range. But even though it may be a bit brighter and sharper than similar priced leupold models, in my case wanting a hunting scope with the best low light performance I can find, I'd say to look very hard at the Leupold VX-R line-up. Nothing else I own comes close to the very low light performance of the two VX-Rs I own; one a Firedot #4 reticle and the other a Firedot Duplex. My 2nd best low light scopes, performance -wise are my two Leupold 30mm European models with #4 reticles (very similar to the newer VX-Rs).
Hunting in very low light has a lot to do with the reticle as well as the overall brightness of the scope, especially if aiming at a dark target such as a bear or hog in very low light. With less bold reticles, you can see your quarry, but lose the reticle on a dark colored target. With the VX-R that will not happen; simply said, if you can see your target, then you can get a well-aimed shot on it.
If extreme low light performance is not needed, I'd say to give the Zeiss a try. I've read of very few that don't consider the Zeiss the best value for your $$ and I am in agreement.
Last edited by Tnhunter444; 12-19-2013 at 08:19 AM.
12-20-2013, 12:20 PM
#3
I'd honestly advise you to wait, unless you want to use the rifle for an upcoming hunt. SHOT Show is in January, and that's when most of the new lines are released. Even if you don't get a brand new release, those new models may lead to some existing models dropping from the $600-$1000 range down into the range you're looking to spend.
Conquests are always a good bet.
Minox is updating their ZA5 line to a ZA5 HD, with Schott glass and USA manufacture - those are being released next month. Comparable to the power you're looking at is the ZA5 HD 3-15x42 SF, ZA5 HD 3-15x50 SF, and ZA5 HD 3-15x56 SF.
I have plenty of experience with the previous generation ZA5 and will always recommend them. The HD version should be up there with the Conquests. I have a suspicion that the only differences between the Minox ZA5 HD and the Conquest HD5 is aesthetics, but I can't confirm this.
Also on my list of recommendations are Nikon Monarch 3 rifle scopes, but opinions of that scope vary greatly depending on who you ask. I have a lot of customers who are very happy with them, others wouldn't give them to an enemy. I personally have never had a reason to complain about them.
Conquests are always a good bet.
Minox is updating their ZA5 line to a ZA5 HD, with Schott glass and USA manufacture - those are being released next month. Comparable to the power you're looking at is the ZA5 HD 3-15x42 SF, ZA5 HD 3-15x50 SF, and ZA5 HD 3-15x56 SF.
I have plenty of experience with the previous generation ZA5 and will always recommend them. The HD version should be up there with the Conquests. I have a suspicion that the only differences between the Minox ZA5 HD and the Conquest HD5 is aesthetics, but I can't confirm this.
Also on my list of recommendations are Nikon Monarch 3 rifle scopes, but opinions of that scope vary greatly depending on who you ask. I have a lot of customers who are very happy with them, others wouldn't give them to an enemy. I personally have never had a reason to complain about them.
12-20-2013, 02:12 PM
#4
Fork Horn
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 370
I'd honestly advise you to wait, unless you want to use the rifle for an upcoming hunt. SHOT Show is in January, and that's when most of the new lines are released. Even if you don't get a brand new release, those new models may lead to some existing models dropping from the $600-$1000 range down into the range you're looking to spend.
.
.
12-21-2013, 06:28 AM
#9
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,186
You probably have all the info now that you need to make your decision .... but late as it may be here's my $.02. You will not go woprng with any top end Leupold. And I am a big fan of the Conquest line too. Obviously your are not short changing your rifle and that is what I will always advise .... buy the very best scope you can afford.
