Best choice out of these?
#11

I suggest sticking with 8X and 40(ish) mm objectives for your price range. Fact is when you increase the power the more noticable the inperfections in the glass/coatings or image. Larger then 43 mm objectives are harder to hold steady, they are also bulky and simply aren't needed for hunting/carry bins IMO.
As too which one let your eyes do the talking. Just make sure to view outside the store lights. I also suggest comparing under both good and fading light. it may take a few trips but its worth the time then being disaapointed in the field.
As too which one let your eyes do the talking. Just make sure to view outside the store lights. I also suggest comparing under both good and fading light. it may take a few trips but its worth the time then being disaapointed in the field.
A bunch of different models listed here:
http://www.google.com/products?q=leu...x42&hl=en&aq=f
#13
Typical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OKC Ok. USA
Posts: 501

I'm thinking from what you listed you're on a limited buget. From what you have listed the Bushnell Trophy aren't bad for the money but I would save up a few more $ and get the 10x42 which in the Trophy can be had at $140. Redfield might be another choice in your price range.
Stay away from Permafocus. Those are the only ones I would for for at your price point. If you can save up in the future look at Bushnell Legend line and some of the Leupold Csacades and other around that price point.
Stay away from Permafocus. Those are the only ones I would for for at your price point. If you can save up in the future look at Bushnell Legend line and some of the Leupold Csacades and other around that price point.
#14

You will save lots of money in the long run. May be hard initially, but when you can count on them from now on, it is a good feeling. Companies won't stamp a full lifetime warranty on something they expect to cost them in the future either, so you will be getting something quality!