HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Optics (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/optics-85/)
-   -   Zeiss Conquest (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/optics/264784-zeiss-conquest.html)

Turkey Agent 09-24-2008 03:54 PM

Zeiss Conquest
 
Have a encore prohunter 209x50 on the way looking at a 3x9x40 Zeiss Conquest to put on it
are they good in low light.

Mojotex 09-24-2008 05:07 PM

RE: Zeiss Conquest
 
My son-in-law bought a Conquest 3-9x40 mm last week forhis ML. I have the 3-9x50 mm I bought in 2007.I also have 2 Leupold Vari-X III's, which are both in about the same $$$ range as the Conquests. One is a 1.5-6x32mm Compact.Theother a 3.5-10 x 50 mm.

We performed a truly unscientific side by side test view the woods behind my house of the deckSunday afernoon starting at about 05:00 p.m.From this "test"I am satisfied that these two Conquest's were easilyalot crisper edge to edge and did a better job of contrast in normal light than either of the Leupold's. As far as which one "gave up" last as darkness fell? We set each scope on 6X as the day ended. Frankly I could not see much difference betweenthe 4until right at the last light, with one important exception. The image in the two Conquests remained more detailed about5 minutes longer.Not much time I know, but there really was a marked difference. Not enough in my opinion to make one a better "shooter" over the other. Using a gum tree stump as our "deer", it was dead well after legal shooting time with any of these scopes.

The two Conquests and the 50 mm Leupopld each had a heavy plex. The compact Leupold did not. All 4 were pretty much "black" atabout the same time. The"standard width" plex in the 32 mm Leupold compact was as drawback as darkess fell.

So what is the definition of "good" from this one experiment? I cannot say for sure. I can say that the Leupold's did fine and the Conquests did better.


timbercruiser 09-24-2008 06:59 PM

RE: Zeiss Conquest
 
You won't be disappointed with the Conquest and if low light is worth a premium the Diavari is as good as it gets. The Elite 4200 isn't very far behind the Conquest and is a little cheaper.

MALLARD76 09-25-2008 06:51 PM

RE: Zeiss Conquest
 
The Conquest is the best value for the price. The clarity is amazing, it will easily give you an extra 10-15 minutes in the stand. Buy one you won't regret it!

bugsNbows 09-27-2008 08:18 AM

RE: Zeiss Conquest
 
+1 on the Conquest.

Turkey Agent 09-27-2008 08:31 AM

RE: Zeiss Conquest
 

Thanks guy’s I went and picket up my TC encore prohunter yesterday so I checked
Out the Zeiss conquest 3.5x10x44 to A Leupold VXIII 3.5x10x50 well
He told me to take them outside they were close looking up in the trees but
When I glassed a flower bed down the street at a bank it was over the colors
just jumped out at me with the Zeiss .

rifle_man 10-02-2008 04:45 PM

RE: Zeiss Conquest
 
the Zeiss Conquest is a great scope you will love it.

7VALLEYS 10-03-2008 09:01 AM

RE: Zeiss Conquest
 
I have a conquest on my kimber and love it. Great scope!

700Rem 10-03-2008 06:45 PM

RE: Zeiss Conquest
 
If you want a good scopeand you want to hunt Hogs etc at night and or low light conditions during the deer season,Go Leupold.Just make sure to get a 50mm.

PaJack 10-07-2008 05:40 PM

RE: Zeiss Conquest
 
Conquest all the way...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:04 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.