Leupold/Zeiss Or Bushnell PLease Help
#4
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
RE: Leupold/Zeiss Or Bushnell PLease Help
[ol][*]Zeiss Conquest 3-9x 40 or 3.5-10x44[*]Leupold 3.5-10x40[/ol]
The Bushnell is going to be a lot heavier then either these 2..If it doesn't both you the 2.5-16x42 would be ok and I am sure it is at least a little better then the 4200's in optical quality. It hasn't been out as long as choice 1 or 2.
The Bushnell is going to be a lot heavier then either these 2..If it doesn't both you the 2.5-16x42 would be ok and I am sure it is at least a little better then the 4200's in optical quality. It hasn't been out as long as choice 1 or 2.
#5
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,970
RE: Leupold/Zeiss Or Bushnell PLease Help
I've heard about some "issues" with the early production run of the new Elite 6500's. I would also (like oldelk) lean towards the Zeiss but, in all honesty, the Leuppy would be fine also.
#10
Fork Horn
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Muskegon,Michigan
Posts: 407
RE: Leupold/Zeiss Or Bushnell PLease Help
i have the zeiss conqeust 3.5x10x50mm and i have to tell ya this thing is awesome,especially in low light with the larger objective.very crisp and clear,i don't know how much they are now but i got a heck of a deal on mine from doug at
www.cameralandny.comsuper good to deal with.....Ted
www.cameralandny.comsuper good to deal with.....Ted