HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Optics (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/optics-85/)
-   -   300 ultra Mag (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/optics/244840-300-ultra-mag.html)

J300 05-03-2008 07:15 PM

300 ultra Mag
 
Any suggestions on a scope for a Remington XCR 300 ultra mag?

timbercruiser 05-03-2008 07:28 PM

RE: 300 ultra Mag
 
Budget? Usage?

J300 05-03-2008 08:13 PM

RE: 300 ultra Mag
 
i was looking to spend between $400 and $600 and moderate use i was looking into zeiss conquest

skeeter 7MM 05-03-2008 09:10 PM

RE: 300 ultra Mag
 

ORIGINAL: J300

i was looking to spend between $400 and $600 and moderate use i was looking into zeiss conquest
3x9x40 conquest with it's 4" of constant ER would be my suggestion - good optics and value.

salukipv1 05-03-2008 09:38 PM

RE: 300 ultra Mag
 
I was going to say zeiss conquest with the z800 reticle! probably in the 4.5-14x or 3.5-10x

Whatever I chose I would get a reticle with multipe aiming points.....ie the leupold B&C, or the nikon BDC, or zeiss Zreticle, the Z800 would be the best for the 300 ultra mag, not the z600





The Rifleman 05-03-2008 09:42 PM

RE: 300 ultra Mag
 
It's not a bad choice - if you were going to use it in the state of Maine for bears or Moose or Whitetail deer - if all you planned on shooting was 100 yards.

But you will find that if you wish to shoot 250 - 500 yards - where that rifles capabilities shines the best - that a 3 x 9-power scope just doesn't cut the mustard.

My very first concern would be trying to sight that rifle in - since the ammo is probably in the neighborhood of $40 + a box.

A nine power scope at 200 yards is going to be a tough shot and at 300 yards it will be hit or miss at best.

I am not a power freak and most times my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 3200 5 x 15 x 50. But in this case - my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 4200

Recoil does need more eye relief, but your rifle also needs a good piece of glass to get the job done.

If you tell me that you are only planning on shooting Pennsylvania Whitetails at 100 yards or less - I would have to tell you that you have way too much rifle for that job.

I like my ground up meat prepared at the butcher shop and not in the woods with a high power rifle.

You shoot a small deer at close range through the front shoulders with that rifle and all you will have is a hand full of ground up meat.

bugsNbows 05-04-2008 06:29 AM

RE: 300 ultra Mag
 
A 9X @ 200 yards tough????? Not sure about that. The Zeiss Conquest would be a good choice. Another would be a Kahles KX 3-9.

kdvollmer 05-04-2008 07:38 AM

RE: 300 ultra Mag
 
9X @ 200 should be plenty considering that the military Snipers used 10X fixed out over 1000 yds for many years.


All Above are good suggestions. I would also say to take a look at the Nikon Buckmaster line. I had one on a Rem 700 PSS .308 and killed a few prairie dogs out over 700 yds. Granted mine was variable to 14X. Granted, not really needed, but I just like to bring critters in nice and close.


Good Luck


skeeter 7MM 05-04-2008 11:39 AM

RE: 300 ultra Mag
 

ORIGINAL: The Rifleman

It's not a bad choice - if you were going to use it in the state of Maine for bears or Moose or Whitetail deer - if all you planned on shooting was 100 yards.

But you will find that if you wish to shoot 250 - 500 yards - where that rifles capabilities shines the best - that a 3 x 9-power scope just doesn't cut the mustard.

My very first concern would be trying to sight that rifle in - since the ammo is probably in the neighborhood of $40 + a box.

A nine power scope at 200 yards is going to be a tough shot and at 300 yards it will be hit or miss at best.

I am not a power freak and most times my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 3200 5 x 15 x 50. But in this case - my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 4200

Recoil does need more eye relief, but your rifle also needs a good piece of glass to get the job done.

If you tell me that you are only planning on shooting Pennsylvania Whitetails at 100 yards or less - I would have to tell you that you have way too much rifle for that job.

I like my ground up meat prepared at the butcher shop and not in the woods with a high power rifle.

You shoot a small deer at close range through the front shoulders with that rifle and all you will have is a hand full of ground up meat.
I don't own a bigame rifle with larger then a 10x scopes andno problems shooting game out to 500 yards. My longest verified shot was 537 yards@ 9x on a pronghorn antelope. I have a 18x on my varmit rifle but in the field I find this too high a lot of the time and end up in the 9-12 range, nothing I hate more then bobbing on a target and the higher the power the more translated to the site picture in terms of movement (hand shake, wind, etc). JMO about the only time high power is nice is off a concrete bench with a solid rest shooting paper.

In terms of the gun ruining more meat, well that all depends on the bullet used. I have seen no more meat waste then any other 300 with the RUM, most of the guys I know who use them run NP, TSX, etc, not your standard/average bullets.

As to the z600 being to smallI really don't think to many RUM user have the set skills to shoot past 600 yards in the field anyway. Of course one could always go back to the old way if they needed more range and hold over. I just got a z600 but prior to that all were non-ballistic style reticles and a mentioned above I have had 0 problems making longer shots. Practice is the key. I suggested the 3x9x40 due to the recoil of a 300RUM and it having 1/2" more ER then the other conquest scopes. Not knowingthe postersexperience with this rifle or other similar reporting rifles I errored on the side of generous in this regard. I have shot several 300RUM's they are fast recoiling and pretty stout b/c of it, not your typical 300 mag report. Getting kissed by the scope is a sure way to develop bad habits!;)

700xcr 05-04-2008 03:14 PM

RE: 300 ultra Mag
 

ORIGINAL: J300

Any suggestions on a scope for a Remington XCR 300 ultra mag?
On my Remington model 700xcr 270wsm I put a Burris Euro-Diamond 2.5x10x44mm with the ballistic Plex retical. I used Warne bases and rings. It is bright and clear. I amd really happy with the ballistic Plex.10x is enough on big game for me. Also like the availability of having it on 2.5 power for thick brushy areas.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.