300 ultra Mag
05-03-2008, 09:10 PM
#4
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,921
RE: 300 ultra Mag
ORIGINAL: J300
i was looking to spend between $400 and $600 and moderate use i was looking into zeiss conquest
i was looking to spend between $400 and $600 and moderate use i was looking into zeiss conquest
05-03-2008, 09:38 PM
#5
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
RE: 300 ultra Mag
I was going to say zeiss conquest with the z800 reticle! probably in the 4.5-14x or 3.5-10x
Whatever I chose I would get a reticle with multipe aiming points.....ie the leupold B&C, or the nikon BDC, or zeiss Zreticle, the Z800 would be the best for the 300 ultra mag, not the z600
Whatever I chose I would get a reticle with multipe aiming points.....ie the leupold B&C, or the nikon BDC, or zeiss Zreticle, the Z800 would be the best for the 300 ultra mag, not the z600
05-03-2008, 09:42 PM
#6
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 321
RE: 300 ultra Mag
It's not a bad choice - if you were going to use it in the state of Maine for bears or Moose or Whitetail deer - if all you planned on shooting was 100 yards.
But you will find that if you wish to shoot 250 - 500 yards - where that rifles capabilities shines the best - that a 3 x 9-power scope just doesn't cut the mustard.
My very first concern would be trying to sight that rifle in - since the ammo is probably in the neighborhood of $40 + a box.
A nine power scope at 200 yards is going to be a tough shot and at 300 yards it will be hit or miss at best.
I am not a power freak and most times my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 3200 5 x 15 x 50. But in this case - my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 4200
Recoil does need more eye relief, but your rifle also needs a good piece of glass to get the job done.
If you tell me that you are only planning on shooting Pennsylvania Whitetails at 100 yards or less - I would have to tell you that you have way too much rifle for that job.
I like my ground up meat prepared at the butcher shop and not in the woods with a high power rifle.
You shoot a small deer at close range through the front shoulders with that rifle and all you will have is a hand full of ground up meat.
But you will find that if you wish to shoot 250 - 500 yards - where that rifles capabilities shines the best - that a 3 x 9-power scope just doesn't cut the mustard.
My very first concern would be trying to sight that rifle in - since the ammo is probably in the neighborhood of $40 + a box.
A nine power scope at 200 yards is going to be a tough shot and at 300 yards it will be hit or miss at best.
I am not a power freak and most times my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 3200 5 x 15 x 50. But in this case - my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 4200
Recoil does need more eye relief, but your rifle also needs a good piece of glass to get the job done.
If you tell me that you are only planning on shooting Pennsylvania Whitetails at 100 yards or less - I would have to tell you that you have way too much rifle for that job.
I like my ground up meat prepared at the butcher shop and not in the woods with a high power rifle.
You shoot a small deer at close range through the front shoulders with that rifle and all you will have is a hand full of ground up meat.
05-04-2008, 07:38 AM
#8
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 583
RE: 300 ultra Mag
9X @ 200 should be plenty considering that the military Snipers used 10X fixed out over 1000 yds for many years.
All Above are good suggestions. I would also say to take a look at the Nikon Buckmaster line. I had one on a Rem 700 PSS .308 and killed a few prairie dogs out over 700 yds. Granted mine was variable to 14X. Granted, not really needed, but I just like to bring critters in nice and close.
Good Luck
All Above are good suggestions. I would also say to take a look at the Nikon Buckmaster line. I had one on a Rem 700 PSS .308 and killed a few prairie dogs out over 700 yds. Granted mine was variable to 14X. Granted, not really needed, but I just like to bring critters in nice and close.
Good Luck
05-04-2008, 11:39 AM
#9
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,921
RE: 300 ultra Mag
ORIGINAL: The Rifleman
It's not a bad choice - if you were going to use it in the state of Maine for bears or Moose or Whitetail deer - if all you planned on shooting was 100 yards.
But you will find that if you wish to shoot 250 - 500 yards - where that rifles capabilities shines the best - that a 3 x 9-power scope just doesn't cut the mustard.
My very first concern would be trying to sight that rifle in - since the ammo is probably in the neighborhood of $40 + a box.
A nine power scope at 200 yards is going to be a tough shot and at 300 yards it will be hit or miss at best.
I am not a power freak and most times my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 3200 5 x 15 x 50. But in this case - my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 4200
Recoil does need more eye relief, but your rifle also needs a good piece of glass to get the job done.
If you tell me that you are only planning on shooting Pennsylvania Whitetails at 100 yards or less - I would have to tell you that you have way too much rifle for that job.
I like my ground up meat prepared at the butcher shop and not in the woods with a high power rifle.
You shoot a small deer at close range through the front shoulders with that rifle and all you will have is a hand full of ground up meat.
It's not a bad choice - if you were going to use it in the state of Maine for bears or Moose or Whitetail deer - if all you planned on shooting was 100 yards.
But you will find that if you wish to shoot 250 - 500 yards - where that rifles capabilities shines the best - that a 3 x 9-power scope just doesn't cut the mustard.
My very first concern would be trying to sight that rifle in - since the ammo is probably in the neighborhood of $40 + a box.
A nine power scope at 200 yards is going to be a tough shot and at 300 yards it will be hit or miss at best.
I am not a power freak and most times my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 3200 5 x 15 x 50. But in this case - my advice would be a Bushnell Elite 4200
Recoil does need more eye relief, but your rifle also needs a good piece of glass to get the job done.
If you tell me that you are only planning on shooting Pennsylvania Whitetails at 100 yards or less - I would have to tell you that you have way too much rifle for that job.
I like my ground up meat prepared at the butcher shop and not in the woods with a high power rifle.
You shoot a small deer at close range through the front shoulders with that rifle and all you will have is a hand full of ground up meat.
In terms of the gun ruining more meat, well that all depends on the bullet used. I have seen no more meat waste then any other 300 with the RUM, most of the guys I know who use them run NP, TSX, etc, not your standard/average bullets.
As to the z600 being to smallI really don't think to many RUM user have the set skills to shoot past 600 yards in the field anyway. Of course one could always go back to the old way if they needed more range and hold over. I just got a z600 but prior to that all were non-ballistic style reticles and a mentioned above I have had 0 problems making longer shots. Practice is the key. I suggested the 3x9x40 due to the recoil of a 300RUM and it having 1/2" more ER then the other conquest scopes. Not knowingthe postersexperience with this rifle or other similar reporting rifles I errored on the side of generous in this regard. I have shot several 300RUM's they are fast recoiling and pretty stout b/c of it, not your typical 300 mag report. Getting kissed by the scope is a sure way to develop bad habits!
05-04-2008, 03:14 PM
#10
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 318
RE: 300 ultra Mag
ORIGINAL: J300
Any suggestions on a scope for a Remington XCR 300 ultra mag?
Any suggestions on a scope for a Remington XCR 300 ultra mag?