HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   qdm 2004 pics (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/94991-qdm-2004-pics.html)

bullmoose38 03-23-2005 01:46 PM

RE: qdm 2004 pics
 
passed this guy up first week of archery. My buddy shot next to our QDM property last week of archery.



bullmoose38 03-23-2005 01:47 PM

RE: qdm 2004 pics
 
shot next door off our QDM property



bullmoose38 03-23-2005 01:52 PM

RE: qdm 2004 pics
 
shot 1st friday of rifle adjacent to our QDM property


BTBowhunter 03-23-2005 02:07 PM

RE: qdm 2004 pics
 
You sure this is all PA?;)

Whats really exciting is that the ones I can tell (from pics it can be tough)
all seem to be relatively young deer.

J Pike 03-23-2005 02:08 PM

RE: qdm 2004 pics
 
Bullmoose, awesome bucks!! Thanks for posting the pics. How many years have you been managing your property? Also what branch of qdma do you belong to? I belong to the mason-dixon branch.

BT. I agree with the exception of one of them they look to be in the 2.5-3.5 year age classes.

Bullmoose, did you guys age the buck's you harvested? Pike

bullmoose38 03-23-2005 05:12 PM

RE: qdm 2004 pics
 

ORIGINAL: J Pike

Bullmoose, awesome bucks!! Thanks for posting the pics. How many years have you been managing your property? Also what branch of qdma do you belong to? I belong to the mason-dixon branch.

BT. I agree with the exception of one of them they look to be in the 2.5-3.5 year age classes.

Bullmoose, did you guys age the buck's you harvested? Pike
J Pike
I started to manage my dads 75 acres in 2002. Each year its been growing. I belong to the Southeast Branch. But thats pretty far from where we have our property. My goal is to get more people involved in Schuylkill county and start our own branch. You belong to the Mason-Dixon Branch so i guess you know Rick Watts. He's a real nice guy. All the deer were aged at 3.5 except the one with the QDM sign in the background. He was only 2.5 and had a 21 inch spread!

bullmoose38 03-23-2005 06:08 PM

RE: qdm 2004 pics
 



bullmoose38 03-23-2005 06:29 PM

RE: qdm 2004 pics
 

ORIGINAL: MikeE51848

Those are some very nice deer. But wasn't it the argument that QDM would not work on a statewide basis? It is great that you can manage your small neck of the woods for these terrific bucks, but I don't believe, and never will, that these results can happen statewide, particulary where large tracks of state or public land are concerned.
I just dont get it. I post these pictures for people to enjoy and then someone posts." But wasn't it the argument that QDM would not work on a statewide basis?" I started this post it is qdm 2004 pics.I dont see anything about arguing statewide QDM. If you are looking for an argument start your own post.

bullmoose38 03-23-2005 06:58 PM

RE: qdm 2004 pics
 

ORIGINAL: Duckmastor2


I just dont get it. I post these pictures for people to enjoy and then someone posts." But wasn't it the argument that QDM would not work on a statewide basis?"
Then take the words "QDM" out of your thread header. You know other people in your state dont agree with the QDM theory. Putting it in is a slap in the face. You didnt have to put that in. How about "Nice Pics from PA"? That would have been enough. Dont try and play innocent. With "QDM" in the thread title, discussion on QDM is fair game IMO.
Listen here! These pics were all taken on QDM land so I GUESS I HAVE THE RIGHT TO CALL THEM QDM 2004 PICS? "Dont try to play innocent." Whats that supposed to mean? In my opinion are you J E L O U S? Because QDM can work!

bullmoose38 03-23-2005 07:04 PM

RE: qdm 2004 pics
 
Before anyone points it out I spelled jealous wrong.:)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:17 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.