|
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
ddear you should know by now that there is at least one _ _ BOWHUNTER that will lie thru his teeth to make trouble, just disregard any an all his "evidence" as that an be done with it! IF he spent more time in the woods an less playing with the report abuse button he would see the mess the deer herd is in in some WMUs!
We are not going to tolerate these personal attacks on other members! I will lock,delete posts and ban any member that cannot understand the plain english in the rules for posting. Have a nice day |
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
quote: ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter quote: The study was conducted after the 2002 season,before any hunter knew what AR would produce and before the effects of HR were evident in areas other than 2G.. NOT!!! The study was conducted in May 2004. Once again, check your facts before you spout! Then why did the report say," hunters were looking forward to te 2004 season? BTW, May 2004 is definitely after the 2002 season!!!!. Once again, check your facts before you embarrass yourself |
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
Geez BT I didnt think you "dissed" anyone with your post. Dont know what ole Uly was thinkin.
But as always I have to agree with you.:D May of 04 is part of the 03 huntin season. Cant wait for those people that believe the deer have been wiped out now to start gripin that the "survey" #'s are not valid.[&o] Just be confident that we are in majority of satisfied hunters.;) |
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
Thanks Illbback!
I am confident that we are in the majority but we have to remember that one of the first principles of propaganda is that disinformation repeated over and over can become truth if it goes unchallenged. New members sign on every day. The only way to stop propaganda and disinformation is to speak the truth over and over and over...... |
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
Give that man a standing ovation for a post well stated!
|
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
I was wondering where the facts to prove just whom is the majority could be found. Are they posted on the PGC's website? Wonder why they'd be posted there?:D:D:D
|
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
Guess I should be flattered but just for the record folks, I dont have a long lost uncle or an evil twin.
 This oughtta last about 15 minutes:D |
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
I was just at the local grocery store/sport shop, the talk there was about these aerial deer counts. 7 guys were there and all 7 said they wouldn't believe a aerial count of anything. 1 guy flew copters in 'Nam used infared sensors to count Charlie, said he could see 75 with his naked eyes standing on a road while the sensors recorded 300.
7 out of 7 that is a MAJORITY of them! |
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
what good is a count going to do? It means nothing if you can't get the sportsmen to believe it. The majority of them have lost faith in the PGC's ability to manage the deer herd.
They are the ones that finacially support the PGC and now the PGC has them questioning how they are running the show! |
RE: Interesting results from an aerial survey at Raystown
ORIGINAL: TBBOWHUNTER I was just at the local grocery store/sport shop, the talk there was about these aerial deer counts. 7 guys were there and all 7 said they wouldn't believe a aerial count of anything. 1 guy flew copters in 'Nam used infared sensors to count Charlie, said he could see 75 with his naked eyes standing on a road while the sensors recorded 300. 7 out of 7 that is a MAJORITY of them! Wow I bet you technology didnt change since Nam.:) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:40 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.