HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   PA Deer Management (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/55599-pa-deer-management.html)

DougE 03-15-2004 07:14 PM

RE: PA Deer Management
 
Junior,I too remember the days of seeing groups of 20 -30 deer.I've said many times that this was far too many deer.I'm not asking for a deer behind every tree.Think about this for a second.There is only one management unit in the state that is at or below it's goal.I live and hunt in that unit.Presently we are at 13 dpsm in this unit.I'm telling you for a fact that we have less bucks overall and way less bigger ones.Unless your hunting in 2g,you're hunting in an area that is above the deer density goals.If you're above the deer density goals you will see more and bigger bucks for a while.However,once those goals are met,there is no way you can have more and bigger bucks.It's mathematically impossible.I'm not against reasonable herd reductions or ar.I'm not against may of the changes implemented.I'm against the ridiculous goals and the lies Alt is using to obtain them.So tell me again,how will we have more and bigger bucks than ever before when these goals are met.

juniorpc 03-15-2004 08:05 PM

RE: PA Deer Management
 
Doug, finally something we agree upon. There were too many deer. Your last sentence was correct as well. What I should have said was that thier will be more bigger bucks. Hell, I have as much Idea as the next guy what isexactly the right answer and what is wrong. I just know that the direction The deer biologist want to go in is correct. The goals of PA deer management are worth attaining. How they actually get there is up for debate. The thing that gets me going is the anti-alt bias. Anti-alt propoganda, anti-alt alterier motive nonsense. Deer management will be fine tuned and overhauled as needed and as the data directs. That's all I ask. Pick a direction, work towards it, tell us the truth (which he is, when he's been wrong he's admitted it), let the studies and the data direct you. Doug no matter how many DPSM we reduce the herd to it won't take too awful long for it to bounce back if we overharvest. But there is still an overabundance of poor habitat out there. No one gave a rats breakfast when local county treasurers were hoarding doe licenses for thier friends (Thank's for nothing LTV), doe licenses dollled out at rates based on what some commissoners feelings were-based on tradition and emotion, sometimes in direct conflict with the biologists recommendations, suddenly a system with some facts, knowledge, science behind it and every is up in arms. Mostly because it's a change, mostly because it's different. Now everybody seems to know how to fix PA's deer herd and it isn't Dr. Alt's way. Heck before he came around no one cared. Now folks care, slowely but surely folks are educating themselves and that's good. It's been a long, long time coming. If x percentage of bucks saved is lower or higher than predicted. If x percentage of bucks at 2.5 years have 4 points or better is higher or lower than predicted, if the average number of fawns decreases while fawn mortality decreases because habitat has improved, If the average number of fawns increases as population decreases, I don't care. I just want deer management to be in tune with all this stuff so I can go out and ethiclly hunt. if the reasoning behind it is sound , you get my support, how many low weight does and scrubby four points can we shoot. A trophy is a trophy for a lot of reasons, one of them being a healthy animal of any sort in the prime of it's existance. I haven't seen too awful many of them in all the time I've been deer hunting and I've harvested a buck every year except a few. Will the changes all take hold and be in place for a long time.. I don't think so. Some will have the expected results, some will have unexpected results both good and bad, but we need to allow the biologist the ability to make the necessary changes, react to the data resulting from the managment stratagies they're implementing. Time, Patience, and trust are needed. Alt has done nothing but good things for PA's hunters. His notariety is the reason he has been able to forge ahead with deer management and his noteriety has also contributed to the negative backlash. He hasn't done anything to warrent any mistrust, not one thing. He sure been the victim of more rumors, false accussations, fabricated "facts" than anyone of us would ever dream of putting up with in private let alone thrown out thier for the entire state to digest. That kinda stuff is ridiculous.
Doug, I think come fall you and I should go spotlighting together. One night I'll host you in Lackawanna County and one night you can host me in Pike County. Heck maybe I'll even buy a round at Mel's tavern or the bar in the Tom Quick in, though last time I think I was a QDM drinker, cause I was one or two age classes up from the young bucks I saw there. Enjoy, Juniorpc.

deaddeer 03-16-2004 05:57 AM

RE: PA Deer Management
 

and his noteriety has also contributed to the negative backlash. He hasn't done anything to warrent any mistrust, not one thing. He sure been the victim of more rumors, false accussations, fabricated "facts" than anyone of us would ever dream of putting up with in private let alone thrown out thier for the entire state to digest. That kinda stuff is ridiculous.

What is truly ridiculous is your misguided defense of Alt. His notoriety did not contribute to the negative backlash, but his numerous, repeated lies did. The lies are easily documented because many appear in PGC press releases that are still available on the net.

For example, Alt said that the buck harvests would return to normal the second year of AR and when the harvest data is released ,you will see that the buck harvest will be lower than the 165 K we harvested last year. I predicted several months ago that the buck harvest would be around 140K and we would harvest fewer 2.5 buck than we did in 2002. Time will tell

juniorpc 03-16-2004 06:51 AM

RE: PA Deer Management
 
Dueling spotlights at 100 yards !!! There's just no hope for ya! Did you read my post about expected, unexpected positive and negative effects. It's called research.... something our deer "management" of the past ignored, failed to do, wasn't based on, or did and was ignored. Be mad at the PGC of the past, the Commissioners who fought the biologists recommendations, fostered myths on not harvesting does, etc. etc. You've been lied to for a long, long time my friend. Juniorpc.

Jason N 03-16-2004 07:59 AM

RE: PA Deer Management
 
Here's a question for you guys talking about the deer density (DD). I am under the impression that the old data was compiled using Deer per Forested Square Mile (DPFSM) and the new data is compiled using Deer per Square Mile (DPSM). Doesn't this in itself say that the DD will appear smaller due to the new practice? I do reallize it's still lower than that of old, just wondering if the decrease is less signifigant than originally thought? Have at it fellas!:D

deaddeer 03-16-2004 07:59 AM

RE: PA Deer Management
 

Time, Patience, and trust are needed
Alt has had 4 years to produce the result he was hired for, herd reduction, and according to the PGC's own stats he has failed miserably.

He has destroyed the trust you say is needed by repeatedly lying to us.

Most researchers conduct experiments on a small scale before implementing a plan that effects an entire population. Alt did the exact opposite.

The PGc has been doing research on our deer for the past 50 years and just because you are unaware of it doesn't mean it didn't happen. Alt is simply continuing studies that have been going on long before he came on board and repeating other studies that have already been done in Md and Miss. Furthermore ,most of these studies will do nothing to improcve deer hunting in the state, just like the bear research did nothing to improve bear hunting.

juniorpc 03-16-2004 10:58 AM

RE: PA Deer Management
 
You win. You don't care to read or listen. You're the winner. Experiment no... research yes. Large/small scale research.. suddenly you know all about research protocal. Heck, you need enough participants in a study to have it be valid. But enough about the truth. I move on "ignored biologists recommendations" that I've stated several times in this thread implies something (lets say research) led to those recommendations that I state were ignored. The climate over the years has also not been very favorable to biologists undertaking much in terms of deer study that would be politiclly incorrect was not fostered, encouraged, nor did it happen much. Can't have much ground breaking (there I go again using that word) research happen under such a negative climate. So yes I understand research has been going on here and in other states. Some of that has been implemented here (hence not so experimental) How about ground breaking (I'm chuckling now)! Four years??? has he now???? How many years have we had antler restrictions???. How about this, don't impose any pressure on the fellow, don't slow him down or quicken his track and just let him do what the biology tells him over that same four year period and see where we would be now. Don't accept that that task he took on was astronomical in scope with hundreds of different pressures and that has affected how quickly he can move, but then hammer the results minus the concession he's had to proceed on a politically and emotionally charged playing field. I conceed, you win. Deaddeer is the winner. Here ye, here ye... I do proclaim....... wow I gotta go run my hounds and relax. First I'll change my spotlight bulb should be one heck of a fall!!(chuckling again, I crack myself up). Juniorpc.

DougE 03-16-2004 06:38 PM

RE: PA Deer Management
 
Junior,I'll be totally honest with you.If I never left Wyoming county,I'd be cheering Alt on.I'd also be saying how sick and tired I was of hearing people complain about seeing no deer.The truth is,many areas have way too many deer.I've never disputed that.However,the reductions are taking place where the herd has already been reduced.Cooincidentally that's also where all the state timber is..I also never complained about ar.Actually I've given Alt credit where I felt is was do.Some of you people just need to get out and hunt some areas where the deer density goals are at or below the goals.Also,prove me wrong about anything that I've posted.You can't.I have the documentation to back up everything I've said.

I actually live in Clearfield county but I grew up in Tunkhannock.I'd be glad to go spotlighting with you some time.I'm in Tunkhannock every few months.I'll probably do a little tukey hunting and trout fishing back there in May.All I ask is that you make a trip out here.We'll compare spottlighting results and I'll show you several enclosures where nothing but junk is growing inside.

CoyotePup 03-19-2004 06:37 AM

RE: PA Deer Management
 
I saw 27 illegal buck in archery season and one legal ... i am under 16 so i didnt complain but i shot a 3 point with a 15 inch spread that was 3.5 years old ! now how the hell are our bucks gonna get bigger with those little junks running around !

juniorpc 03-19-2004 08:44 AM

RE: PA Deer Management
 
Yes, Doug thier are areas out thier that are more in line with managment goals. Your suggesting he micromange these areas? Heck he's had to scratch and claw just for an initial foothold. I'm all for letting him take a good stab at deer managment and take a look at it down the road. Folks can't ignore the fact that the great hurdles- misguided views of the public, politicians, PGC law enforcement personell, PGC Commissioners, A century of traditon, that needed to be overcome have shaped his first couple years of managment. Things can't change overnight and folks who never supported him because it was change or simply that it was Alt, then isolate this fact or that fact and sight it as evidence that "Alt has failed." Just getting this far was a huge victory, and one only he could have accomplished (it took someone with some noteriety and media connects to overcome the immense opposition from within). Thing will only get better in the long run. Which doesn't mean there will not be ups and downs, good decisions and poor ones. Folks just need to leave it in the hands of the folks who have the best chance to make the right decisions. That's all I've ever advocated.. leave it in the hands of the folks who have the best oppertunity to make the correct decisions. has he done everything right, nope, but he's still standing so he's done most things right.... fine tuning will come, more drastic changes based on what data shows will come too, admitting this change was better, that change was worse for things will come too. Folks don't want to here that though. They'd rather it stay the same, despite what negative impact that would have. Using hunting as a proper manament tool is what will allow hunting to stand the test of time. Doug, email me or I'll email you as we get closer to fall and well meet up to spotlight a couple times. Juniorpc. Juniorpc


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.