More on the failed Pa game commission deer plan - audit article
03-03-2010, 01:57 PM
#71
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Naw they don't run the show. There's plenty on both sides here
03-03-2010, 02:02 PM
#72
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: York, PA.
Posts: 1,313
I support the DMAP program 100%! I believe that any landowner should be able to shoot each and every deer that resides on their property or the land they control (as long as the meat doesnt go to waste) and by any means nec. Pike
03-03-2010, 02:23 PM
#73
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
Im right down the middle on the issue of dmap. I think its being used a bit too heavy handedly in the s.f's. On the other hand i think its a good idea to give landowners the option as another tool along with redtag depredation killing etc..., then if they feel they have too many deer, they only have themselves to blame, and shouldnt whine about the allocations that effect the entire unit.
03-03-2010, 02:26 PM
#75
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
"Naw they don't run the show. There's plenty on both sides here. It's just that there's a couple of really vocal bashers that never stop obsessing over the whole thing. There are also many reasonable folks with important viewpoints from both sides too. It's pretty easy to seperate em in short order. "
03-03-2010, 02:32 PM
#76
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
"The other simply rants and rants with very little to back him up and just rants louder and longer the same old crap when challenged. Ask him to back up what he says and he simply yells liar liar."
03-03-2010, 02:33 PM
#77
Fork Horn
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 297
03-03-2010, 03:02 PM
#80
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
"Feel free to post the screen names of those active members who support the PGC DMP. Then post the names of the PGC supporters that can support their position with independent data. You can't do it because there is no data that supports the PGC DMP and the audit proved that!!! "
I know very very few support the hr end of it. Even the couple vocal proponents on the program admit it needs tweaked, and even on biased boards like pgc the polls tell the tale of pgc woe and little support. So it isnt like much of anyone really supports it as is. Though some of us know that more significant changes are needed than just adding 2 more dpsm by cutting the allocation by 1k in one or two units! lol.
