stop complainin...start hunting
#181
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879

Ands the heard crashed not long aster that.There is no way that Pa could support 2 million deer without extensive damage to the habitat.
#183

The whole problem in a nut shell. To many different opinions! No matter what or if any changes to the deer program. With all those, involved,hunters,BOC,DNCR,biologists,farmers and the rest of the stake holders. Your always going to have someone pizzed off and complaining about the deer program. It's going to be never ending! Example; just look at this years proposals. Adding the other WMU's to the buck only for the first week and the DMP's. Already have heard smack from hunters,DNCR,the BOC, biologists and others about the proposals. No matter what happens,not everyone is ever going to be happy.
#185
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978

"In that example I'm referring to the greatly diminished hunting pressure in the gun season , especially in the Northern tier on opening day of rifle. Instead of "game over" by Monday at dark after the "big shoot" the hunting is good all season long."
"Your opinion and mine are based on the handfuls of folks we interact with in person and online."
"Too few in some small spots? also agree."
"Less deer is something we needed most places
"Better hunting in spite of lower numbers? I think so. Better average bucks and better average doe size and it's still easy to find em in good numbers
As for average buck size, its a meaningless stat.
Afterall, whats better... 50% of 100 or 75% of 50?? If we are talking about anything that would be beneficial to have more of, ... Id suggest grabbing the 50% as opposed to the 75....
Last edited by Cornelius08; 02-04-2010 at 07:52 AM.
#186
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978

No matter what happens,not everyone is ever going to be happy.
Though i dont think it the ideal solution, alot more were happy previously. And with compromise, alot more can and should be happ-IER than they are now, and possibly even moreso than previously as well.
With more deer than now, but less than previously, the percieved deer "problems" will still be addressed more than they were previously. + those few wanting less deer have plenty of "tools" available that werent previously. Hunters would have somewhat more deer than currently... No losers.
Last edited by Cornelius08; 02-04-2010 at 07:55 AM.
#187

Elected by who?
By the general voting public? bad idea! Guaranteed PETA would have their own version of ACORN out there in a heartbeat and it'd be game over.
By hunting license buyers? That'd be OK but we'd best see to it that the PGC stays funded exclusively by hunters or it'd never happen.
#188

#189

Elected by who?
By the general voting public? bad idea! Guaranteed PETA would have their own version of ACORN out there in a heartbeat and it'd be game over.
By hunting license buyers? That'd be OK but we'd best see to it that the PGC stays funded exclusively by hunters or it'd never happen.
By the general voting public? bad idea! Guaranteed PETA would have their own version of ACORN out there in a heartbeat and it'd be game over.
By hunting license buyers? That'd be OK but we'd best see to it that the PGC stays funded exclusively by hunters or it'd never happen.

#190
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978

btb says: "By hunting license buyers? That'd be OK but we'd best see to it that the PGC stays funded exclusively by hunters or it'd never happen. "
BP says:
"Don't know? If we let the deer herd grow, climate control activists may be next to jump on the band wagon? Excessive gas emissions from deer droppings altering the Ozone"
"Don't know? If we let the deer herd grow, climate control activists may be next to jump on the band wagon? Excessive gas emissions from deer droppings altering the Ozone"
That too can be solved. Just get a car company to start working on a deer pellet burning engine for one of their hybrids. Less emissions than gas. Problem solved. lol