stop complainin...start hunting
#161
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Carbon County Pa.
Posts: 601

Pats, you speak of previous maleffects. Imho there are far more now. Ive seen and heard about so much crap because of "hunters" being so darn desparate to kill a deer that they sink to any lengths. Ive seen hunters fistfight over treestand location, Ive heard more arguing than ever, Ive seen in the newspaper where hunting dogs were poisoned because some idiots put out poison in bait, hoping to kill coyotes up on gamelands 111 because of so few deer. Ive seen deer left to rot because they didnt have the 4th point. Ive seen & heard alot of things.
#162
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978

I think youre mistaken doug. I dont think we ever will, but we most likely could have 1.5 mil preseason deer again if we wanted to. All a matter of how those deer were dispersed across the state. While the areas that are the worst might not be able to hold alot more deer than currently, plenty of other areas could. If laid out in the ideal manner & micromanaged, I have no doubt 1.5 million deer could be had with no unacceptable effects to the habitat.
Not saying i want 1.6 mil. Or that we should necessarily have. But it wouldnt be impossible is all im saying. There are no "reams" that say otherwise either. Though Im sure that the states that have and have had WAY higher deer densities than we do currently have a ream or two available.
Not saying i want 1.6 mil. Or that we should necessarily have. But it wouldnt be impossible is all im saying. There are no "reams" that say otherwise either. Though Im sure that the states that have and have had WAY higher deer densities than we do currently have a ream or two available.

Last edited by Cornelius08; 02-03-2010 at 02:22 PM.
#163
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,236

In the glaciated regions of the northern tier, you couldn't grow an oak tree even if you popped an acorn up your booboo and incubated it.
I don't think that deer can hurt the habitat in pole timber, but is it fair and humane to try to range too many deer in that scenario to begin with? That is not the best thing as far as herd health. When you carry too many deer in that condition, they will gather in heavy concentrations in wintering areas and malnutrition and disease from close contact will emerge. That is not a very good life for a deer IMO.
I don't think that deer can hurt the habitat in pole timber, but is it fair and humane to try to range too many deer in that scenario to begin with? That is not the best thing as far as herd health. When you carry too many deer in that condition, they will gather in heavy concentrations in wintering areas and malnutrition and disease from close contact will emerge. That is not a very good life for a deer IMO.
#164
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879

When you carry too many deer in that condition, they will gather in heavy concentrations in wintering areas and malnutrition and disease from close contact will emerge. That is not a very good life for a deer IMO.
What disease inflicted our deer when we had 1.6m PS deer in 2001?
Just what is this mysterious deer that inflicts our deer . IMHO it is called antlerless deer harvests which is caused by the antlerless deer allocations. Do you have a better more informed answer?
#165
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Carbon County Pa.
Posts: 601

Back when we had 1.6m deer, me and a friend stumbled upon a southeren exposure bedding area during the off season. There were so much deer droppings it was hard to walk through with out stepping in fresh droppings. You could see where the deer actually bedded in this stuff. I don't know about any diseases, but how can having so many deer concentrated in one area that they lay in their own crap be a healthy environment.
#166
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978

Im sure the deer had plenty of other bedding options other than in their own filth. If they did so it was incidental and just not very picky deer i guess. lol.
Ive never seen such a thing, and back in the late 90's we had a heckuva lot of deer here.
Ive never seen such a thing, and back in the late 90's we had a heckuva lot of deer here.
#167
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Carbon County Pa.
Posts: 601

It was on top of a ridge. We jumped them by mistake, they took off down the winter side of the mountian. i counted 26 as they ran past and my friend who owns the place was in front of me seen a bunch before I did. Anyway they don't have that problem any more, they are lucky to see one droping. I have a mom and twins who like to bed down where i have a stand. I never knew three little deer could make so much mess. They always come back and plop down in and around it.
#168
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978

Oh ive seen a pellet or three in deer beds and in and around areas where they spend much time. Id not call it a health threat. It just is the way it is, they have no toilet. lol
Im thinking one of my favorite hunting spots where I hafta walk through a narrow fenced lane area of a cattle pasture to get to my spot on the far side of the property, through over ankle deep mixture of wet cow dung & urine for about 75 yards is abit nasty though.
Never have deer pick up my scent when crossing my trail in though, on the bright side. lol.
Im thinking one of my favorite hunting spots where I hafta walk through a narrow fenced lane area of a cattle pasture to get to my spot on the far side of the property, through over ankle deep mixture of wet cow dung & urine for about 75 yards is abit nasty though.
Never have deer pick up my scent when crossing my trail in though, on the bright side. lol.
#169
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,236

There are diseases that inflict deer when they are gathered in high concentrations.
Malnutrition is a concern as well.
I remember when eating a deer from the northern tier was less than enjoyable. Simply because they damn near ate rocks and tree bark to survive.
In the last several years we have noticed that the deer are full of ribbons of fat and have an improved palatability.
Malnutrition is a concern as well.
I remember when eating a deer from the northern tier was less than enjoyable. Simply because they damn near ate rocks and tree bark to survive.
In the last several years we have noticed that the deer are full of ribbons of fat and have an improved palatability.
#170
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879

There are diseases that inflict deer when they are gathered in high concentrations.
The PGC has been making the same claim for many years, but the funny thing is we have never had an outbreak of disease that was the result of high DD. Also, even in Valley Forge with a DD of over 200 DPSM, the herd has not suffered from a disease that is transferred from deer to deer.So the threat of disease seems to be a red herring the PGC tries to use to justify HR just like they claimed our buck age structure was a problem in order to justify ARs,when in fact ARs were implemented to get more rapid HR.