Exactly. It's ashame. There's legititmate concerns out there, but they get brushed away because some of the people bringing up the concerns have such extremist views.

HAHAHA LMAO...how'd you know, it only took 2 minutes.

There has been a pile of bid dung deposited on this site.:s13:

Dementia explains it best but ego pilots the short bus.:sad:

Just like a response to a guy who claims the sky is green, you got an appropriate response for your claim.

Yup, brilliant.

if you think you are so much smarter than me, why don't you define the principle of MSY and then explain why the data from VF doesn't support my position that the MSY CC of the habitat in VF , 5C and 5B is around 200 DPSM.

Sorry, but making preposterous claims does not give you the privilege of conducting a pop quiz. That privelege is reserved for someone with a realistic working knowledge of the issue at hand.

Larry, Your problem begins with maximum sustained yield, and thats a measure that works better with green beans and corn than it does deer.

You are now providing us with the proof of your incompetency, bluffing works, some times in poker, but never when facts are involved.Your baffle them with B.S. is not gonna get it here.

[quote=BTBowhunter;3540308]Sorry, but making preposterous claims does not give you the privilege of conducting a pop quiz. [quote]

hahahahh, ya gotta appreciate the little things in life....and that was funny.

Here is a simple question for those that question my position on VF. If he herd in VF exceeded the MSY CC before it reached 200 DPSM , how did the herd increase to 240 DPFSM s Glue posted?