|
Originally Posted by pats102862
(Post 3520996)
People with multiple tags popping multiple deer at one time, instead of harvesting one deer,
Originally Posted by bluebird2
(Post 3521107)
But who was responsible for making that legal? The PGC ,of course.
Originally Posted by pats102862
(Post 3521176)
141.41 genral hunting regs. It is unlawfull to harvest more than one deer at a time before lawfuly tagging a deer previously harvasted when multiple harvest of deer per day are authorized. Except as otherwise provided in 141.1 {special reg areas}. So except in special areas, popping multiple deer at one time is unlawful.
|
I guess it depends on how you define "at the same time". Does it mean from the same stand on the same deer or does it mean shooting two deer before you tag one. Or does it mean shooting two deer before you tagged, gutted and removed the first deer as you implied.
|
Originally Posted by Maverick 1
(Post 3521218)
I don't know if you are selfish and self centered or not but, you are NOT coming across in a positive manner right now. In fact your coming across a bit repulsive. It's not so much what you say. It's all in your attitude.
|
No I don't have any use for greedy slobs, but I don't see where we gain anything by labeling hunters with multiple tags who harvest more than one doe /day as greedy, whether the doe are shot 5 minutes apart. 5 hours apart or 5 days apart. With the reduced deer herd I doubt very much that the number of doe that are harvested before tagging the first doe has any impact on future hunting.
The last time we had so few deer in the state I believe ( not sure)hunters were allowed one deer/hunter /years. Now every hunter is able to harvest a buck and as many antlerless deer as he has permits. That's the real problem and I don't see any solution accept for enough hunters quitting so that the PGC loses the ability to control the herd and that is a terrible solution. |
Originally Posted by pats102862
(Post 3520996)
People with multiple tags popping multiple deer at one time, instead of harvesting one deer
Originally Posted by bluebird2
(Post 3521107)
But who was responsible for making that legal? The PGC ,of course.
Originally Posted by pats102862
(Post 3521176)
141.41 genral hunting regs. It is unlawfull to harvest more than one deer at a time before lawfuly tagging a deer previously harvasted when multiple harvest of deer per day are authorized. Except as otherwise provided in 141.1 {special reg areas}. So except in special areas, popping multiple deer at one time is unlawful.
Originally Posted by bluebird2
(Post 3521307)
I guess it depends on how you define "at the same time". Does it mean from the same stand on the same deer or does it mean shooting two deer before you tag one. Or does it mean shooting two deer before you tagged, gutted and removed the first deer as you implied.
|
Originally Posted by bluebird2
(Post 3521357)
whether the doe are shot 5 minutes apart. 5 hours apart or 5 days apart. With the reduced deer herd I doubt very much that the number of doe that are harvested before tagging the first doe has any impact on future hunting.
|
Originally Posted by bluebird2
(Post 3521357)
No I don't have any use for greedy slobs, but I don't see where we gain anything by labeling hunters with multiple tags who harvest more than one doe /day as greedy, whether the doe are shot 5 minutes apart. 5 hours apart or 5 days apart. With the reduced deer herd I doubt very much that the number of doe that are harvested before tagging the first doe has any impact on future hunting.
The last time we had so few deer in the state I believe ( not sure)hunters were allowed one deer/hunter /years. Now every hunter is able to harvest a buck and as many antlerless deer as he has permits. That's the real problem and I don't see any solution accept for enough hunters quitting so that the PGC loses the ability to control the herd and that is a terrible solution. |
And I have a different opinion about the significance of what you are discussing.
|
Originally Posted by blkpowder
(Post 3521331)
I'm not self centered or selfish. But your are right about not coming across in a positive manner. Because we have been discussing greedy slob's. I don't have a positive attitude for greedy slob's. Do you?
|
Originally Posted by Maverick 1
(Post 3521470)
All hunters that hunt with a rifle, all hunters that shoot does, all hunters that particapate on organized deer drives, and all hunters that hunt from a camp or group are NOT greedy slobs as you seem to imply.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:51 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.