So we're to accept that you were "confused" when you posted the cumulative results of two consecutive seasons from 7 years earlier with last seasons results.

Sounds plausible
Thanks for saving me the search though

No, I was no confused, I simply typed 12 instead of 6. Now please provide the quotes to support your other false and misleading claims, like you said you would. Put up or shut up!!

Guess you have your answer bb.

Those were posed as questions and not quotes. The point was that you had several conflicting stories about the last season. You say you were "confused" well OK then I guess I was confused by your multiple various answers.

I guess I have the right to be confused. Just in your last few posts you've said you were thinking of two other seasons 7 years ago and then later said you just typed the wrong number. So was it just a typo or did you mix up the seasons?

The questions I posed may not have been a 100% accurate quote but anyone here knows you had more than one story. The search feature here isnt what it used to be although I did find where you claimed to only have seen 3 deer in 10 days in 2008 but it didnt specify the season. Either way, I've seen you post long enough to know that you know exactly what thought you're trying to convey and that you choose your words carefully, either inserting or leaving out details to make a given point. Except of course, when you get "confused".

Once again you lie. I said I made a mistake , I did not say I was confused. Furthermore,you are lying when you say I gave several conflicting stories about the last season.

You are also lying when you claim that your accusations were just posed as questions. you were accusing me of making false claims about what I saw during the 2008 season and you try to use a mistake that I had already explained in detail.

Now post the quote where I said I never set foot in 2F or where I said I only saw 6 deer during the 2008 season. You can't do it so that makes you a liar.

You mean this kind of detail?


as for this one....


Please go look at where I corrected myself on statement almost an hour ago

Now all you have to do is prove that statement wasn't true. Put up or shut up.

You said nothing about 2 F an hour ago. You are still lying.

8:02 PM I'd call that close to an hour.....

You should make sure your not "confused" again before you claim someone is lying.

I base my comments on 2F on the data provided by the PGC. You and others like you think you know more than the professional PGC experts who yo support. But, the PGC doesn't care about the observations of hunters like you and me, so your observations are meaningless to the PGC and they are also meaningless to me because you are obviously biased.

So my original statement was technically incorrect because you did set foot in 2F sometime in your life but the theme of what I said was spot on. That your observations on 2F are based solely on what you've read and on your interperetation of what you've read.