RE: Antler Restrictions (What they found in TX)
I think they COULD allow 2 buck per year. Make the first buck tag the general one inclusive in your license purchase. Allow hunters the opportunity to purchase a second "trophy" tag for a decent chunk of change....let's just use $40 or so for a example. How do you think rifle hunters would react to allowing archers to harvest two buck before rifle hunters even set foot in the woods? |
RE: Antler Restrictions (What they found in TX)
You have absolutely no evidence to support your delusional contention that 10K bucks die each year from nonhunting mortality. Now try again AR is not HR...... HR is not AR The same thing happened in Miss. and it is just common sense when you consider that the PGC uses an 18% non-hunting mortality rate for bucks. |
RE: Antler Restrictions (What they found in TX)
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 I think they COULD allow 2 buck per year. Make the first buck tag the general one inclusive in your license purchase. Allow hunters the opportunity to purchase a second "trophy" tag for a decent chunk of change....let's just use $40 or so for a example. How do you think rifle hunters would react to allowing archers to harvest two buck before rifle hunters even set foot in the woods? |
RE: Antler Restrictions (What they found in TX)
Then I guess the PGC would have no choice but to shorten archery season so the few bucks that would be left could breed the emaining doe undisturbed.;)
|
RE: Antler Restrictions (What they found in TX)
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 You have absolutely no evidence to support your delusional contention that 10K bucks die each year from nonhunting mortality. Now try again AR is not HR...... HR is not AR The same thing happened in Miss. and it is just common sense when you consider that the PGC uses an 18% non-hunting mortality rate for bucks. |
RE: Antler Restrictions (What they found in TX)
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 Then I guess the PGC would have no choice but to shorten archery season so the few bucks that would be left could breed the emaining doe undisturbed.;) BTW, I would make the second buck tag archery only, and NO crossbows. Two buck tags in rifle season would kill too many. Crossbows might already accomplish this feat by themselves. I think success rates would have to be low, but to those who succeed it would be worth the extra $. |
RE: Antler Restrictions (What they found in TX)
ORIGINAL: Screamin Steel ORIGINAL: bluebird2 Then I guess the PGC would have no choice but to shorten archery season so the few bucks that would be left could breed the emaining doe undisturbed.;) BTW, I would make the second buck tag archery only, and NO crossbows. Two buck tags in rifle season would kill too many. Crossbows might already accomplish this feat by themselves. I think success rates would have to be low, but to those who succeed it would be worth the extra $. |
RE: Antler Restrictions (What they found in TX)
I dont support 2 tags for buck. That would be rediculous overkill.
We already are killing too many deer thanks to the ecoextremist deer plan. And now, the fact an extreme shortcut has been introduced to archery season and the crossgun is now in able bodied mens hands who've greedilystripped the sole usage from the handicapped...and that equals even more unwarranted deer slaughter thanks to pgc asnine decision and their unwillingness even prior to it to set APPROPRIATE allocations. |
RE: Antler Restrictions (What they found in TX)
BTW, I would make the second buck tag archery only, and NO crossbows |
RE: Antler Restrictions (What they found in TX)
Yes, I was being sarcastic. And yes, I don't put anything past the BOC these days. I heard they are considering fully automatic weapons for the latemuzzleloader hunt next year. As of course they should be. They surely have as much place there as the xbows in regular archery season. (More sarcasm.);)
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:39 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.