![]() |
RE: PGC data flawed
Original Explorer Jack: For what purpose? Look at 2G. They know 2G can carry more deer yet they continue to slaughter off what they can instead of bring the deer herd up to carry capacity. So no the information don't matter to them cause they don't use it and continue on with their deer slaughter when they reach the holding capacity of deers in WMUs. So the only info they want is how to get money from taxes so they can go tell you hunters to take another flying !@#$ with your money. Original Bluebird2: The PGC already knows the antlerless harvests are still reducing the herd but they still claim they are stabilizing the herd. Better doe mortality info won't change that. It's beginning to appear that some people don't want to see better information. I can't imagine why any hunter would not want the data the PGC uses to be as accurate as possible especially with all the allegations that the PGC is mismanaging the deer from those who seem to object to seeking better informtion. Could it be that more accurate information wouldn't support their agenda? |
RE: PGC data flawed
it sure is looking that way isnt it :D
|
RE: PGC data flawed
Well, we know that the
is allergic to the truth. I think he'd break out in hives and his feathers would fall out if he was required to speak it:D |
RE: PGC data flawed
baldbird ?????
|
RE: PGC data flawed
It's beginning to appear that some people don't want to see better information. I can't imagine why any hunter would not want the data the PGC uses to be as accurate as possible especially with all the allegations that the PGC is mismanaging the deer from those who seem to object to seeking better informtion. |
RE: PGC data flawed
FYI , they are called bald eagles not baldbirds.;)
|
RE: PGC data flawed
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 It's beginning to appear that some people don't want to see better information. I can't imagine why any hunter would not want the data the PGC uses to be as accurate as possible especially with all the allegations that the PGC is mismanaging the deer from those who seem to object to seeking better informtion. ![]() |
RE: PGC data flawed
i just got in from checking the feeders and putting out some more alfalfa.
i had camera up at different feeder to try to get idea HOW MANY DEER ARE COMING INTO EACH FEEDER. well, i had 5 on this feeder i checked. last feeder had 4 deer , 3 looked like 1.5 yr old deer,1 was a 2 year old or so. this feeder that had 5,,,1 was a FAWN ,boy, i was happy to see that, next 3 looked like 1.5 yr old deer and again 1,, 2 yr old or so doe. no bucks that i can see by holes in head. all were very healthy looking and this was in area that WANNABEES were saying they are dying.:) |
RE: PGC data flawed
Thank you for proving once again that there is nothing the PGC could ever do that would meet with your approval. |
RE: PGC data flawed
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 Thank you for proving once again that there is nothing the PGC could ever do that would meet with your approval. Buy secretly preventing those hunting around him from killing any deer ,he is invaluable atsingle handily sabotaging the P.G.C. herd reduction program.[:-] |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.