Pennsylvanians, what lawsuit?
#81
ORIGINAL: Cornelius08
"You really need to do a little more checking before you call someone liar.
There has been an ongoing hunter satisfaction survey since 2003 in Pa
This is the independent company doing it:
http://www.responsivemanagement.com "
Actually I dont have to do a thing. I dont call someone liar if I dont know it for a fact, nor did I do so in this case without warrant. The ONLY evaluations one has are the "unscientific" ones taken place on message boards, and all those through the years have been NON-herd reduction by a landslide...(nothing new there eh?)
Please point to the questioning line where "How do you feel about the level of Herd reduction that has been implemented?" exists? THAT is exactly what I stated and you know it. I saidhunters do not support the level of hr, no way, no how.
"The published results show continued support for AR's "
Ha ha ha. SO? I couldnt care less about ar one way or the other overall. I actually believe that slightly more than half are for it quite possibly.
"and less but still majority support for the program overall. "
And nearly NOONE is for the extent of herd reduction! Even those who claim partial support of the plan usually fess up to that part. Most in the real world will tell you flat out...ITs a joke!
"Do a little homework before you spout off and save yourself some embarrassment"
Stick to the topic and quit trying to lie to get out of your own dose. The only embarrassment I feel....ALMOST...is FOR YOU.
"You really need to do a little more checking before you call someone liar.
There has been an ongoing hunter satisfaction survey since 2003 in Pa
This is the independent company doing it:
http://www.responsivemanagement.com "
Actually I dont have to do a thing. I dont call someone liar if I dont know it for a fact, nor did I do so in this case without warrant. The ONLY evaluations one has are the "unscientific" ones taken place on message boards, and all those through the years have been NON-herd reduction by a landslide...(nothing new there eh?)
Please point to the questioning line where "How do you feel about the level of Herd reduction that has been implemented?" exists? THAT is exactly what I stated and you know it. I saidhunters do not support the level of hr, no way, no how.
"The published results show continued support for AR's "
Ha ha ha. SO? I couldnt care less about ar one way or the other overall. I actually believe that slightly more than half are for it quite possibly.
"and less but still majority support for the program overall. "
And nearly NOONE is for the extent of herd reduction! Even those who claim partial support of the plan usually fess up to that part. Most in the real world will tell you flat out...ITs a joke!
"Do a little homework before you spout off and save yourself some embarrassment"
Stick to the topic and quit trying to lie to get out of your own dose. The only embarrassment I feel....ALMOST...is FOR YOU.
Corny said:
The ONLY evaluations one has are the "unscientific" ones taken place on message boards, and all those through the years have been NON-herd reduction by a landslide.
Im well aware of that survey and have been for quite some timeand am also well aware that it has NOTHING to do with what was stated
#82
Banned
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
You cant rile me with stupidy. I have an idea of the level of deer density in differing wmus and can tell you its a helluva lot more than one. That doesnt change the fact that there are far fewer than could be and should be for no good reason.
YOU may wanna give that up to ecofruitcakes desires but dont expect everyone else to.
My biggest gripes arent killing deer. Hell I could kill 100 of them. My skill is as good as anyones and so is my experience and dedication to the sport. I dont like what Im seeking and how it effects our sport. I HATE having ecoidiots dictating our management, and I dont like ALL of the effects it has caused.
BTW, I hunt buck only these days, and dont shoot barely legal bucks. Only way Ive been effected is I am seeing fewer "good" bucks even despite ar, thanks to our wmu being reduced by over 50% to the ow herd, for no good reason at all.
I dont have one particular gripe singularly. The whole cumulativeresult sux.
YOU may wanna give that up to ecofruitcakes desires but dont expect everyone else to.
My biggest gripes arent killing deer. Hell I could kill 100 of them. My skill is as good as anyones and so is my experience and dedication to the sport. I dont like what Im seeking and how it effects our sport. I HATE having ecoidiots dictating our management, and I dont like ALL of the effects it has caused.
BTW, I hunt buck only these days, and dont shoot barely legal bucks. Only way Ive been effected is I am seeing fewer "good" bucks even despite ar, thanks to our wmu being reduced by over 50% to the ow herd, for no good reason at all.
I dont have one particular gripe singularly. The whole cumulativeresult sux.
#83
Banned
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
"Now we see who the liar is. "
That was more than evident the very first day I ever laid eyes on this board...YOU.
So....What part of THIS dont you understand? I reference HERD REDUCTION SEVERAL TIMES... Including in the very quote you used from me!
"The ONLY evaluations one has are the "unscientific" ones taken place on message boards, and all those through the years have been NON-herd reduction by a landslide."
If that statement is FALSE, please provide the quote and link to that says it is false. Show me the support for excessive herd reduction. Ha ha ha![8D]
That was more than evident the very first day I ever laid eyes on this board...YOU.
So....What part of THIS dont you understand? I reference HERD REDUCTION SEVERAL TIMES... Including in the very quote you used from me!
"The ONLY evaluations one has are the "unscientific" ones taken place on message boards, and all those through the years have been NON-herd reduction by a landslide."
If that statement is FALSE, please provide the quote and link to that says it is false. Show me the support for excessive herd reduction. Ha ha ha![8D]
#84
ORIGINAL: bullmoose38
Now thats funny but sad too!!!!!!!!! It was probably meat from a doe!
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
BTW one of USP'sfounding members, past presidents and honorary life members wasarrested and convictedfor selling deer meat
BTW one of USP'sfounding members, past presidents and honorary life members wasarrested and convictedfor selling deer meat
Since it's public record, I can give you a hint who it was. Here's the website:
http://www.unifiedsportsmenpa.org/officer.html
Look at the honorary life member list
Maybe their theme song should be "We're so sorry, Uncle ALBERT"
#85
I just wanted to say that I am NOT a member of the USP and that I am a very successful PA hunter.
I have more success than most. I also hunted West Virginia for 16 years but quit there in 2002.
I, for one, am not happy with the current Pennsylvania deer herd.
I can live with the current AR's but prefer the old rules. I feel that the PGC went way overboard on HR.
The PGC is biting the hand that feeds it. I personally hope they go bankrupt.Everyone worries that the DCNR will take over and ruin hunting.
How could they ruin hunting anymore than the PGC already has?
The PGC complains how they are running out of money, yet they find a way to fund a fisher reintroduction program. I'm sorry, when your are running out of money, you don't fund projects like that.
I have more success than most. I also hunted West Virginia for 16 years but quit there in 2002.
I, for one, am not happy with the current Pennsylvania deer herd.
I can live with the current AR's but prefer the old rules. I feel that the PGC went way overboard on HR.
The PGC is biting the hand that feeds it. I personally hope they go bankrupt.Everyone worries that the DCNR will take over and ruin hunting.
How could they ruin hunting anymore than the PGC already has?
The PGC complains how they are running out of money, yet they find a way to fund a fisher reintroduction program. I'm sorry, when your are running out of money, you don't fund projects like that.
#87
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
BTB referred to a review of the PA plan by other state agencies, when no such review exists. Cornelius referred to a survey of PA hunters where the majority rated the plan as fair to poor. BTB simply can't handle the truth and engage in a fair and honest debate.
#88
Banned
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
I agree windwalker. I have no fear of a dnr/dcnr type system. That is what is in place in nearly every state across the country, yet Pa is the worst managed and has the highest level of hunter disgust BY FAR. Pa has the independent designation, but they are far from it and corrupt as all get-out. At least in an OPEN state run system the agency IS accountable to the people andsome obtuse small group like Audubon cannothavethe first and last word in wildlife management on a statewide basis just becausea couple of their cronyidiots managed to land commissioner seasts.
#89
ORIGINAL: Cornelius08
"Now we see who the liar is. "
That was more than evident the very first day I ever laid eyes on this board...YOU.
So....What part of THIS dont you understand? I reference HERD REDUCTION SEVERAL TIMES... Including in the very quote you used from me!
"The ONLY evaluations one has are the "unscientific" ones taken place on message boards, and all those through the years have been NON-herd reduction by a landslide."
If that statement is FALSE, please provide the quote and link to that says it is false. Show me the support for excessive herd reduction. Ha ha ha![8D]
"Now we see who the liar is. "
That was more than evident the very first day I ever laid eyes on this board...YOU.
So....What part of THIS dont you understand? I reference HERD REDUCTION SEVERAL TIMES... Including in the very quote you used from me!
"The ONLY evaluations one has are the "unscientific" ones taken place on message boards, and all those through the years have been NON-herd reduction by a landslide."
If that statement is FALSE, please provide the quote and link to that says it is false. Show me the support for excessive herd reduction. Ha ha ha![8D]
#90
ORIGINAL: Cornelius08
I agree windwalker. I have no fear of a dnr/dcnr type system. That is what is in place in nearly every state across the country, yet Pa is the worst managed and has the highest level of hunter disgust BY FAR. Pa has the independent designation, but they are far from it and corrupt as all get-out. At least in an OPEN state run system the agency IS accountable to the people andsome obtuse small group like Audubon cannothavethe first and last word in wildlife management on a statewide basis just becausea couple of their cronyidiots managed to land commissioner seasts.
I agree windwalker. I have no fear of a dnr/dcnr type system. That is what is in place in nearly every state across the country, yet Pa is the worst managed and has the highest level of hunter disgust BY FAR. Pa has the independent designation, but they are far from it and corrupt as all get-out. At least in an OPEN state run system the agency IS accountable to the people andsome obtuse small group like Audubon cannothavethe first and last word in wildlife management on a statewide basis just becausea couple of their cronyidiots managed to land commissioner seasts.



