HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   2006-2007 NY Deer Take (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/182594-2006-2007-ny-deer-take.html)

Fletch NY 02-28-2007 07:41 AM

2006-2007 NY Deer Take
 
As I thought even though a lot of people were saying worst year ever! The deer take was up over the previous year.






Another Safe, Successful, and CWD-free Season
>
> New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC)
> today announced the results of the 2006-07 deer hunting seasons
> including deer harvest, information on Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) and
> hunter safety statistics.
>
> During the 2006-07 deer hunting seasons, hunters harvested
> slightly more than 189,100 deer, including approximately 96,600 bucks
> and 92,500 antlerless deer. After three years of declining deer takes,
> results from this past season represent a slight increase from the 2005
> deer harvest. The slight increase was expected following management
> actions in 2004 and 2005 intended to rebuild and stabilize the deer
> population in many areas of the State, since many Wildlife Management
> Units (WMUs) were below desired levels.
>
> 2006 Deer Harvest Comparison
>
> 2005 2006
> Total 180,214 189,108
> Adult Male 89,015 96,569
> Antlerless 91,199 92,539
> Adult Female 61,179 60,101
> DMPs Issued 387,620 396,500
> DMP 63,048 63,293
> DMAP 9,967 9,989
> Muzzleloader 15,232 15,746
>
> Archery 26,431 29,454
>
> *New York hunters once again had a safe and successful deer
> season,* said Acting Executive Deputy Commissioner, Carl Johnson.
> *Our harvest results from this past season are right about where we
> projected, and we are encouraged to see modest growth in many Southern
> Zone units. We are also very pleased that despite testing almost 8,000
> deer in 2006, no new cases of Chronic Wasting Disease have been
> detected.*
>
> The 2006 harvest of almost 96,600 bucks was an encouraging 8%
> increase over the 89,200 bucks
> taken in 2005, suggesting that deer populations in many portions of the
> State are growing slowly and recent management actions are working. The
> 2006 antlerless take remained stable from 2005, despite a nominal
> increase in Deer Management Permits (DMPs) for 2006. DMPs are issued
> for harvest of antlerless deer only, and their availability varies among
> WMUs depending on the status of the deer population in each WMU relative
> to objective levels.
>
> *Our intent in much of the State was for conservative
> antlerless harvest this season to maintain moderate population growth in
> areas hit hard by severe winter conditions and high harvests several
> years ago,* said Acting Executive Deputy Commissioner, Carl Johnson.
> *While the 2006 harvest suggests deer populations are growing over
> much of the State, the Department acknowledges that increases may not be
> as fast or as large as many hunters would prefer. However, the number
> of WMUs with deer populations near desired levels is increasing, and
> with the conservative antlerless harvest this past year, we anticipate
> continued success in achieving objectives over the next few years.*
>
> Since 1990, DEC has used local Citizen Task Forces to establish
> deer population objectives for most WMUs. The task forces represent a
> broad range of public interests and consider concerns of many
> stakeholder groups including farmers, foresters, conservationists,
> landowners, hunters, and others. The desired deer population level of
> each WMU is expressed as a Buck Take Objective (BTO) and reflects the
> approximate buck take per square mile that would be taken when the deer
> population is close to the desired level.
>
> Deer populations vary considerably throughout New York, and
> currently about 25% of the WMUs have deer populations that are within
> 10% of desired levels. About 20% of the units have deer populations
> greater than desired, while the remaining 55% of the units have lower
> than desired deer populations. The goal of DEC's deer management
> program is to maintain deer numbers at levels that meet local interests
> and habitat conditions, while also providing quality hunting
> opportunities for New York's 550,000 deer hunters.
>
> In 2006, muzzleloader hunting once again gained in popularity
> with over 220,000 hunters holding the muzzleloading privilege and a
> total take of more than 15,700 deer, 67% of which were antlerless deer.
> This is the highest muzzleloading take on record. New York*s 200,000
> archers also faired well in 2006, with a take of almost 29,500 deer.
> Bowhunters continued to show strong preference for bucks, which
> comprised 65% of their harvest.
>
> Take on Deer Management Assistance Program (DMAP) permits
> remained just under 10,000 deer, virtually unchanged from 2005. DMAP
> permits are issued for focused removal of antlerless deer on specific
> properties and are important for reducing deer related damage or for
> meeting land management or other deer management goals.
>
> Western New York continues to lead the State in deer harvest
> densities, with the top five counties being: Yates County (10.4 total
> deer/mi2), Genesee County (9.4 total deer/mi2), Tompkins County (8.5
> total deer/mi2), Ontario County (8.3 total deer/mi2), and Tioga County
> (8.1 total deer/mi2). However, total harvest is strongly impacted by
> the number of DMPs available in an area and thus the harvest of
> antlerless deer. A more accurate picture of deer densities is revealed
> by the density of buck harvest. The top five counties in New York for
> buck harvest density were: Allegany County (4.2 bucks/mi2), Yates County
> (3.9 bucks/mi2), Tompkins County (3.6 bucks/mi2), Wyoming County (3.6
> bucks/mi2), and Orange County (3.6 bucks/mi2).
>
> Pilot Antler Restriction Program
>
> New York*s pilot antler restriction program began in 2005 in
> WMUs 3C and 3J, located primarily in Ulster County, and was expanded in
> 2006 to include WMUs 3H and 3K, primarily in Sullivan County. The
> antler restriction stipulates that bucks taken in WMUs 3C, 3H, 3J and
> 3Khave at least one antler with three points at least one inch in length
> to be legal. This standard is intended to reduce harvest of yearling
> bucks (1 years old), allowing them to survive to older ages.
>
> Buck take in each of these units is following the expected
> trend: a significant drop during the first year of the program and an
> increase toward objective levels in the second year. The pilot program
> has demonstrated some success in shifting the age composition of the
> buck harvest, as harvest has changed from roughly 60% yearlings, 30% 2.5
> year olds, and 10% 3.5+ year olds prior to the antler restriction to 35%
> yearlings, 40% 2.5 year olds, and 25% 3.5+ year old bucks with the
> antler restriction.
>
> Chronic Wasting Disease
>
> Efforts continued with CWD surveillance through sampling of
> hunter killed deer statewide and mandatory deer check in the
> Oneida-Madison County CWD Containment Area. Despite testing over 7,900
> deer, including 1,800 deer from the CWD Containment Area in 2006, no new
> cases were detected. CWD is a rare neurological disease that affects
> the brains of deer, elk and moose, causing the animals to become
> emaciated, lose body functions and eventually die. CWD surveillance
> began in New York in 2002, with increased efforts in 2005 after the
> disease was detected in 5 captive and 2 wild deer in Oneida County.
> Since 2002, over 18,700 samples have been collected throughout the
> state, including 3,900 samples from the Oneida-Madison County CWD
> Containment Area.
>
> Hunter Safety
>
> New York has an extremely safety-conscious generation of
> hunters, largely due to the annual efforts of over 3,000 dedicated
> volunteer Sportsman Education instructors.
>
> The extraordinary safety record of hunters in New York continued
> in 2006. With only 35 hunting related shooting incidents, 2006 was the
> 4th safest year since such records have been maintained. There were
> only 19 two-party shooting incidents in 2006, a record low. However,
> there were 16 self-inflicted incidents, which is above the 5-year
> average of 10 incidents per year. Twenty of last year's incidents,
> including the single hunting fatality of 2006, occurred in big game
> seasons. Comparing these figures to the previous decades shows a
> remarkable improvement in safety.
>
> While hunter numbers have declined in New York over the past
> decade, the decline in hunting related shooting incidents is primarily
> attributable to improved hunter safety. The rate of hunting incidents
> (incidents per 100,000 hunters) is declining much faster than the number
> of hunters. During the 1960s, the incident rate was 19 incidents per
> 100,000 hunters. Since 2000, the incident rate is one-third of that,
> averaging 6.3 incidents per 100,000 hunters.










Link to Post - Back to Top Logged

absolut40 02-28-2007 03:54 PM

RE: 2006-2007 NY Deer Take
 
They can post all of the figures they want but all i know isthe deerhunting sucked in Tioga county this year.

NiceAndBlue 02-28-2007 04:46 PM

RE: 2006-2007 NY Deer Take
 

ORIGINAL: absolut40

They can post all of the figures they want but all i know isthe deerhunting sucked in Tioga county this year.
sucked in chenango too. well for me at least...

farm hunter 02-28-2007 08:47 PM

RE: 2006-2007 NY Deer Take
 
Looks about what they said it would be.

We had an increased harvest in 7M - Does especially I'd say - though I haven't seen the Unit numbers yet.

FH


RWK 02-28-2007 09:08 PM

RE: 2006-2007 NY Deer Take
 
remember liars figure and figures lie. thats ben provenen a ton of times. Rich

doctariAFC 03-01-2007 07:44 AM

RE: 2006-2007 NY Deer Take
 
No doubt. The numbers look like what was predicted, but, accuracy will depend on harvest reporting compliance, and I'd like to get the estimate on that one for this past season, too.

Final numbers should be released soon. Then I can crunch the numbers. Have lots of numbers to crunch, including the updated license sales figures I received a couple weeks ago.



Fletch NY 03-01-2007 08:02 AM

RE: 2006-2007 NY Deer Take
 



The attached tables provide details on New York's 2006-07 deer
> harvest. 2005 - 2006
> CALCULATED DEER TAKE BY WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT UNIT (WMU)
>
> N U M B E R O F D E E R BUCKS PER
> 2005 2006 SQUARE MILE
> WMU BUCKS TOTAL BUCKS TOTAL 2005 2006
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 1C 614 2,076 850 2,357 0.7 0.9
> 3A 617 767 656 804 1.0 1.1
> 3C 299 730 508 911 0.9 1.6
> 3F 781 1,942 775 1,661 2.4 2.3
> 3G 1,167 2,370 1,076 1,999 2.6 2.4
> 3H 1,297 1,696 876 1,608 2.3 1.6
> 3J 626 1,458 712 1,683 1.8 2.0
> 3K 833 992 656 1,129 2.2 1.7
> 3M 2,514 5,762 2,820 5,807 3.4 3.8
> 3N 578 1,327 540 1,086 2.6 2.4
> 3P 278 512 317 520 2.2 2.5
> 3R 165 308 114 302 0.8 0.6
> 3S 587 1,694 596 1,724 1.4 1.4
> 4A 568 897 670 1,027 1.3 1.6
> 4B 255 714 246 528 1.6 1.5
> 4C 490 947 491 746 3.0 3.0
> 4F 2,262 4,357 2,650 4,305 2.4 2.8
> 4G 789 1,534 940 1,481 2.1 2.5
> 4H 632 1,282 737 1,102 2.2 2.5
> 4J 134 481 141 418 0.9 0.9
> 4K 271 479 246 342 1.7 1.6
> 4L 197 349 215 296 1.1 1.2
> 4M 152 289 191 240 1.1 1.3
> 4N 462 725 497 806 2.2 2.4
> 4O 1,244 1,456 1,449 1,691 1.7 1.9
> 4P 569 661 690 788 1.6 1.9
> 4R 432 516 535 612 1.5 1.8
> 4S 398 716 457 553 1.8 2.1
> 4T 328 798 360 639 2.5 2.7
> 4U 194 443 229 287 1.5 1.8
> 4W 713 829 972 1,138 1.6 2.2
> 4X 46 51 66 69 0.6 0.8
> 4Y 520 1,349 538 925 2.9 3.0
> 4Z 718 1,576 578 1,105 2.9 2.3
> 5A 527 745 611 950 0.6 0.7
> 5C 314 378 420 554 0.3 0.5
> 5F 592 742 589 809 0.4 0.4
> 5G 1,091 1,508 1,205 1,754 1.0 1.1
> 5H 1,923 2,461 2,018 2,705 0.7 0.7
> 5J 984 1,495 1,092 1,674 1.2 1.4
> 5K 250 378 325 519 1.5 2.0
> 5N 1,042 1,730 1,284 2,138 2.3 2.9
> 5P 57 138 101 195 1.7 3.1
> 5R 487 858 523 911 1.3 1.4
> 6A 2,152 3,915 2,339 4,393 1.5 1.6
> 6C 1,382 2,784 1,534 2,466 1.6 1.7
> 6F 883 1,086 984 1,294 0.7 0.8
> 2005 - 2006
> CALCULATED DEER TAKE BY WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT UNIT (WMU)
>
> N U M B E R O F D E E R BUCKS PER
> 2005 2006 SQUARE MILE
> WMU BUCKS TOTAL BUCKS TOTAL 2005 2006
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 6G 2,509 5,696 2,677 5,749 2.5 2.6
> 6H 173 339 212 470 1.0 1.2
> 6J 906 1,311 1,079 1,623 0.5 0.6
> 6K 1,646 2,907 2,016 3,274 1.5 1.9
> 6N 522 653 587 712 1.1 1.2
> 6P 294 516 332 714 1.4 1.6
> 6R 707 1,623 825 1,477 1.3 1.5
> 6S 1,043 1,944 1,154 1,963 1.8 2.0
> 7A 780 1,022 1,057 1,810 1.4 1.9
> 7F 1,035 2,581 1,145 2,656 1.5 1.7
> 7H 1,033 3,272 1,092 2,557 2.9 3.1
> 7J 1,976 4,074 1,911 4,554 2.4 2.3
> 7M 3,939 5,000 4,490 7,618 2.4 2.7
> 7R 2,464 6,480 2,513 6,275 3.3 3.4
> 7S 2,039 4,379 2,070 4,147 2.8 2.8
> 8A 964 2,433 875 2,388 2.3 2.1
> 8C 93 360 88 266 0.7 0.6
> 8F 1,731 4,392 1,730 4,841 2.4 2.4
> 8G 1,928 5,637 1,986 5,914 2.8 2.9
> 8H 1,839 5,609 2,004 5,168 3.2 3.5
> 8J 1,702 4,177 1,640 4,434 2.4 2.3
> 8M 881 1,874 1,050 2,342 2.9 3.4
> 8N 1,515 5,210 1,586 3,880 4.8 5.0
> 8P 1,052 1,953 1,211 2,260 3.0 3.4
> 8R 1,174 3,271 1,059 2,607 4.3 3.9
> 8S 803 1,598 709 1,511 3.1 2.8
> 8T 1,249 2,338 1,374 2,770 3.2 3.6
> 8W 1,067 1,804 1,166 2,101 2.4 2.7
> 8X 1,506 2,790 1,629 3,810 3.8 4.1
> 8Y 944 1,635 1,130 2,298 2.7 3.2
> 9A 834 1,917 788 1,793 1.8 1.7
> 9F 832 2,353 772 1,612 3.0 2.8
> 9G 502 1,442 471 929 2.2 2.0
> 9H 3,260 7,158 3,461 7,584 3.4 3.6
> 9J 1,907 3,670 2,343 4,844 2.7 3.4
> 9K 1,221 2,514 1,319 2,708 2.7 3.0
> 9M 1,274 2,480 1,409 2,625 3.9 4.3
> 9N 631 1,160 789 1,619 3.0 3.8
> 9P 2,077 3,872 2,476 4,785 3.6 4.3
> 9R 599 1,017 628 1,456 2.8 2.9
> 9S 203 302 170 326 2.2 1.9
> 9T 646 1,040 775 1,414 2.6 3.1
> 9W 854 1,601 973 1,845 3.4 3.9
> 9X 697 1,070 800 1,366 3.2 3.7
> 9Y 550 1,439 579 962 4.4 4.6
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> TOT 89,015 180,214 96,569 189,108
>
>
>
>
> CALCULATED DEER TAKE BY COUNTY 2005 - 2006
>
> N U M B E R O F D E E R BUCKS PER
> 2005 2006 SQUARE MILE
> COUNTY BUCKS TOTAL BUCKS TOTAL 2005
> 2006
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ALBANY 851 2,118 942 1,747 1.6
> 1.8
> ALLEGANY 3,880 7,335 4,438 8,341 3.7
> 4.2
> BROOME 1,418 2,853 1,601 2,971 2.0
> 2.2
> CATTARAUGUS 3,921 7,321 4,320 8,492 3.1
> 3.4
> CAYUGA 1,793 4,579 1,832 4,375 2.5
> 2.6
> CHAUTAUQUA 2,814 5,641 3,332 6,810 2.6
> 3.1
> CHEMUNG 1,017 1,846 1,232 2,395 2.5
> 3.0
> CHENANGO 2,365 2,982 2,769 4,628 2.6
> 3.0
> CLINTON 504 655 640 933 0.5
> 0.6
> COLUMBIA 1,696 4,024 1,649 2,864 2.6
> 2.5
> CORTLAND 1,045 1,763 1,032 2,073 2.1
> 2.1
> DELAWARE 2,355 2,828 2,847 3,323 1.6
> 1.9
> DUTCHESS 2,010 4,472 1,894 3,780 2.5
> 2.3
> ERIE 2,563 6,232 2,482 5,380 3.1
> 3.0
> ESSEX 1,128 1,437 1,053 1,438 0.6
> 0.6
> FRANKLIN 1,187 1,853 1,333 2,012 0.7
> 0.8
> FULTON 494 856 573 877 0.9
> 1.1
> GENESEE 1,406 4,147 1,505 4,574 2.9
> 3.1
> GREENE 945 1,539 1,175 1,521 1.4
> 1.8
> HAMILTON 826 987 855 1,060 0.5
> 0.5
> HERKIMER 1,656 2,780 1,679 2,661 1.1
> 1.2
> JEFFERSON 2,778 5,934 3,056 6,218 2.1
> 2.3
> LEWIS 1,401 2,429 1,634 2,615 1.1
> 1.3
> LIVINGSTON 1,900 4,864 2,207 5,172 2.9
> 3.4
> MADISON 1,295 2,167 1,406 2,798 2.0
> 2.1
> MONROE 1,593 4,336 1,695 4,118 2.4
> 2.6
> MONTGOMERY 434 836 560 929 1.0
> 1.3
> NIAGARA 918 2,101 876 1,897 1.8
> 1.7
> ONEIDA 1,842 3,135 2,067 3,647 1.5
> 1.7
> ONONDAGA 1,336 2,960 1,516 3,365 1.7
> 1.9
> ONTARIO 2,082 6,053 2,169 5,426 3.2
> 3.3
> ORANGE 2,655 5,822 2,988 5,975 3.2
> 3.6
> ORLEANS 922 2,525 841 2,419 2.3
> 2.1
> OSWEGO 1,425 2,371 1,806 3,125 1.5
> 1.8
> OTSEGO 2,402 4,420 2,758 4,454 2.4
> 2.7
> PUTNAM 553 1,238 518 1,004 2.4
> 2.3
> RENSSELAER 1,170 2,200 1,229 1,765 1.7
> 1.8
> ROCKLAND 157 287 107 289 0.9
> 0.6
> SARATOGA 1,065 1,763 1,252 2,073 1.3
> 1.5
> SCHENECTADY 232 395 244 359 1.1
> 1.2
> SCHOHARIE 1,307 2,452 1,508 2,428 2.1
> 2.4
> SCHUYLER 993 2,254 983 2,184 3.0
> 3.0
> SENECA 820 1,952 825 2,129 2.4
> 2.4
> ST LAWRENCE 3,385 5,951 3,763 6,442 1.2
> 1.3
> STEUBEN 4,541 8,577 4,972 10,229 3.2
> 3.5
> SUFFOLK 614 2,076 850 2,357 0.7
> 0.9
> CALCULATED DEER TAKE BY COUNTY 2005 - 2006
>
> N U M B E R O F D E E R BUCKS PER
> 2005 2006 SQUARE MILE
> COUNTY BUCKS TOTAL BUCKS TOTAL 2005
> 2006
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SULLIVAN 2,337 3,083 1,896 3,250 2.3
> 1.9
> TIOGA 1,906 4,486 1,870 4,271 3.6
> 3.5
> TOMPKINS 1,836 4,707 1,789 4,198 3.7
> 3.6
> ULSTER 1,483 2,978 1,664 3,188 1.3
> 1.5
> WARREN 638 812 788 1,038 0.7
> 0.9
> WASHINGTON 1,582 2,598 1,987 3,285 1.9
> 2.4
> WAYNE 1,555 3,901 1,488 4,148 2.6
> 2.5
> WESTCHESTER 587 1,694 596 1,724 1.4
> 1.4
> WYOMING 1,908 4,431 2,129 4,772 3.2
> 3.6
> YATES 1,489 4,178 1,349 3,562 4.4
> 3.9
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> TOTALS 89,015 180,214 96,569 189,108
>
>
> NEW YORK STATE
> DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
> CALCULATED DEER HARVEST BY ZONE FOR 2006
>
>
>
> REG
> BIG MALE MALE FEMALE FEMALE TOTAL
> GAME ARCHERY DMP MUZLDR DMAP ADULT FAWN ADULT FAWN DEER
> NORTHERN ZONE
> TOTALS 13,140 1,982 2,663 8,333 2,309 17,363 2,020 7,607 1,437 28,427
> Archery 1,053 143 660 126 1,982
> Deer Management
> Permit 51 577 1,607 428 2,663
> Muzzleloader 3,085 806 3,952 490 8,333
> DMAP 37 494 1,385 393 2,309
>
> SOUTHERN ZONE
> TOTALS 57,334 26,626 59,305 7,413 7,646 78,356 16,041 51,558 12,369
> 158,324
> Archery 17,574 1,486 6,327 1,239 26,626
> Deer Management
> Permit 1,218 12,120 36,656 9,311 59,305
> Muzzleloader 2,110 795 3,989 519 7,413
> DMAP 122 1,639 4,585 1,300 7,646
>
> LONG ISLAND
> TOTALS 152 846 1,325 0 34 850 275 937 295 2,357
> Archery 659 38 122 27 846
> Deer Management
> Permit 94 195 785 251 1,325
> DMAP 9 6 13 6 34
>
> STATEWIDE
> TOTALS 70,626 29,454 63,293 15,746 9,989 96,569 18,336 60,102 14,101
> 189,108
> Archery 19,286 1,667 7,109 1,392 29,454
> Deer Management
> Permit 1,363 12,892 39,048 9,990 63,293
> Muzzleloader 5,195 1,601 7,941 1,009 15,746
> DMAP 168 2,139 5,983 1,699 9,989
>
>
> NEW YORK STATE
> DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
>
> Proposed Buck Take Objectives and Actual Buck Take
> for the NYS 2006 Deer Season
> (FIGURES IN BUCKS PER SQUARE MILE)
>
> Wildlife Management Unit Proposed Buck Take Objective Actual
> Buck Take Wildlife Management Unit Proposed Buck
> Take Objective Actual
> Buck Take
> 1C not set 0.9 6H not set 1.2
> 3A * 3.0 1.1 6J not set 0.6
> 3C * 2.7 1.6 6K * 1.8 1.9
> 3F * 2.4 2.3 6N not set 1.2
> 3G * 4.1 2.4 6P
> * 1.3 1.6
> 3H * 4.2 1.6 6R
> * 0.7 1.5
> 3J * 3.4 2.0 6S
> * 2.5 2.0
> 3K * 3.5 1.7 7A * 1.8 1.9
> 3M * 3.3 3.8 7F
> * 1.5 1.7
> 3N * 2.7 2.4 7H * 2.8 3.1
> 3P * 2.5 2.5 7J * 2.2 2.3
> 3R not set 0.6 7M * 2.5 2.7
> 3S not set 1.4 7R * 2.7 3.4
> 4A * 1.9 1.6 7S * 3.0 2.8
> 4B * 1.2 1.5 8A
> * 1.5 2.1
> 4C * 4.5 3.0 8C
> * 0.5 0.6
> 4F * 3.4 2.8 8F
> * 1.9 2.4
> 4G * 2.3 2.5 8G
> * 2.3 2.9
> 4H * 3.4 2.5 8H
> * 2.8 3.5
> 4J not set 0.9 8J * 2.1 2.3
> 4K * 3.0 1.6 8M
> * 3.9 3.4
> 4L * 2.0 1.2 8N not set 5.0
> 4M * 1.9 1.3 8P
> * 4.2 3.4
> 4N * 3.5 2.4 8R * 4.2 3.9
> 4O * 3.3 1.9 8S
> * 4.2 2.8
> 4P * 2.7 1.9 8T
> * 4.8 3.6
> 4R * 5.1 1.8 8W
> * 3.8 2.7
> 4S * 3.3 2.1 8X not set 4.1
>
> Wildlife Management Unit Proposed Buck Take Objective Actual
> Buck Take Wildlife Management Unit Proposed Buck
> Take Objective Actual
> Buck Take
> 4T * 2.9 2.7 8Y * 4.5 3.2
> 4U * 4.1 1.8 9A
> * 1.1 1.7
> 4W * 4.0 2.2 9F
> * 2.5 2.8
> 4X not set 0.8 9G * 2.0 2.0
> 4Y * 3.9 3.0 9H
> * 4.0 3.6
> 4Z * 4.7 2.3 9J * 3.5 3.4
> 5A not set 0.7 9K * 4.0 3.0
>
> 5C not set 0.5 9M * 5.1 4.3
> 5F not set 0.4 9N * 3.5 3.8
>
> 5G not set 1.1 9P * 6.0 4.3
> 5H not set 0.7 9R * 4.1 2.9
> 5J not set 1.4 9S * 3.1 1.9
> 5K * 2.8 2.0 9T
> * 4.4 3.1
> 5N * 3.5 2.9 9W
> * 4.4 3.9
> 5P * 3.4 3.1 9X * 5.8 3.7
> 5R * 1.3 1.4 9Y * 5.0 4.6
> 6A * 1.7 1.6 Totals:
> 6C * 1.8 1.7 92 WMU*s Statewide
> 6F not set 0.8 75 WMU*s with a Buck Take Objective
> 6G * 1.7 2.6 17 WMU*s without a
> Buck Take Objective
>
>
> * 2006 buck take is 10% or more above the
> objective.......... 15 WMUs (20 %)
> * 2006 buck take is within 10% of the
> objective................... 19 WMUs (25 %)
> * 2006 buck take is 10% or more below the
> objective........... 41 WMUs (54 %)
>
>
> No mark Buck take objective is not established or
> unit not open...17 WMUs
>
>
> The Buck Take Objective for a Wildlife Management Unit
> represents the desired number of antlered bucks harvested annually per
> square mile. Buck take objectives are based upon recommendations made
> by Citizen Task Forces in each WMU. On average, hunters take a
> consistent percentage of the adult bucks available each year. DEC
> biologists use buck takes as an index of the success in reaching and
> maintaining deer populations at the recommended levels within each WMU.







ABarOfSoap 03-09-2007 04:45 PM

RE: 2006-2007 NY Deer Take
 
are these numbers acurate, they seem sooooo far from the truth, eveyone i talked too in NY had one of the worse seasons ever, along with the pilot restriction and alot less dmp, and where i hunt on longisland we barley saw any deer get checked in all year?

Tom_L 03-13-2007 04:11 PM

RE: 2006-2007 NY Deer Take
 
For what it's worth I hunted with a group of 3 others in Hamilton County (muzzleloader). It is only my 2nd year hunting in NY but the others have been going there for 30+ years.

In 2 days we got 2 bucks and 2 does. The folks with experience said they saw more deer this year than any other, and I can confirm that driving the road at night was dangerous.

Fletch NY 03-13-2007 04:33 PM

RE: 2006-2007 NY Deer Take
 
Between 5 of us we had an average plusseason in 7f with take and sightings.

We had a better than average year in 7m in overall sightings andway better than average big buck sightings just average take though cause we could not shoot straight last season!!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.