HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/124575-nj-deer-pill-not-99-effective.html)

Outdoor 12-11-2005 01:22 PM

NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
 
Read this today in our NH "Hawkeye" paper and could not believe what I was reading.. It said Princeton NJ residents saw fawns bouncing around this past june and were not to happy >>> They wanted to know what went wrong because they hired Anthony DiNicola president of White Buffalo Inc...and get this.. the most well known deer sharpshooter in the country..Sorry all other sharpshooters don't count. Anyway Anthony collected $500 smackers per deer he shot with the birth control vaccine "SPAY VAC". But obviously the deer still had "little ones". As a result at press time Spay Vac had been shelved for more testing!
I must say good for you Anthony on the 500 per shot.. To bad these residents don't do some home work and let hunters (bow or otherwise) help manage their herd after all it's you & me that keep pouring dollars into Conservation.
FYI Hunters Contributions for Conservation now surpass $700 MILLION ANNUALY ($703,794,135.00) copy of report is available at http://federalasst.fws.gov.

kevin1 12-12-2005 10:16 AM

RE: NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
 
Antis drive a lot of this mentality , and they'll never believe that hunting is a solution .
When you consider the birth rate of whitetails even if you had a contraceptive that actually works it would never be more cost effective , or as effective period , as a hunter shooting the same deer . Remember , these are the same kind of folks who hired Mr. DiNicola to sharpshoot a bunch of deer around Princton recently . Hunting that pays for itself is bad , but sharpshooting or ineffective darting that costs a fortune is good ?

GREEK HUNTER 12-12-2005 02:58 PM

RE: NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
 
so how can i become a sharp shooter :)

jerseyhunter 12-12-2005 04:32 PM

RE: NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
 
If the townslet the hunters do the culling they would atleast benifit monetary wise as far as gas,lodging, licenses, restaraunts etc, Instead the taxpayers are footing the bill.

Wild Outdoorsman 12-12-2005 04:34 PM

RE: NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
 
Jersey are you JerseyJim on New Jersey hunter.com

jerseyhunter 12-13-2005 05:47 PM

RE: NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
 

ORIGINAL: Wild Outdoorsman

Jersey are you JerseyJim on New Jersey hunter.com
No, I'm jerseyhunter on that site also.

JerseyJim 12-14-2005 08:14 PM

RE: NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
 

ORIGINAL: Wild Outdoorsman

Jersey are you JerseyJim on New Jersey hunter.com
I'm JerseyJim here as well....and on the 20 other sites I go to...LOL!

vital shooter 12-17-2005 10:47 PM

RE: NJ Deer pill NOT 99% effective
 
It be cheaper to tranquilize the bucks and put 50 cent condoms on them.French ticklers for her pleasure also. Alot cheaper and prob more effective than the so called pill shot.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.