Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Regional Forums > Northeast
 Vermont Passes Antler Restriction >

Vermont Passes Antler Restriction

Community
Northeast ME, NH, VT, NY, CT, RI, MA, PA, DE, WV, MD, NJ Remember, the Regional forums are for hunting topics only.

Vermont Passes Antler Restriction

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-21-2005, 11:04 AM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,555
Default RE: Vermont Passes Antler Restriction

It's finally nice to see more and more hunters supporting QDM. Ar's are a good tool but habitat inprovment can also do a lot for the herd. I hope VT compliments the AR's with cutting to inprove browse and also land preservation. I don't know if you guys in VT are feeling the squeeze of urban sprawl like we are in Southern Maine and New Hampshire.

All in all I think VT is on the right track.
adams is offline  
Old 06-21-2005, 11:07 AM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Warren PA USA
Posts: 1,512
Default RE: Vermont Passes Antler Restriction

No doubt that some 1.5 year old bucks have more than spikes. If they are born early and have good habitat and brows, you can even see some 6 and 8 pointers in this age class. I have found sheds from an 8pt year and a half old. This is the exception and not the rule though.
No argument there.

Some stats from VT Fish & Wildlife. The VT buck harvest consists of an average of 60% 1.5 year old bucks over the past two years. Of these young bucks, they averaged 2.9 points and weighed 114 pounds. I think the current rule will allow more young bucks to get into the next age class than you might think.
If you're averaging a 3 point then based on the data provided most 1-1/2 yo bucks will be legal to harvest even with a restriction. Sure you'll save some, but I can't see it being a very large number. Maybedue to hunters looking harder and losing the opportunity you gain a few more. Personally I don't see it being a big step and I don't see it helping much. But, I'm also in no way saying you're wrong....just a difference of opinion.
Jason N is offline  
Old 06-21-2005, 01:06 PM
  #13  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Altoona,PA
Posts: 679
Default RE: Vermont Passes Antler Restriction

thats good they cut the limit of bucks back.. i was going to say if they added another tag i think that would be shooting themselves in the foot..i agree not many hunters are able to tell on the hoof.. and some bucks are hard to tell, but most 1 1/2 are so easy to tell.. and for the hunter that really believes in AR they should learn andpass on them, cause shooting those 6 and 8's are the ones you should pass till the next year... i also dont think many bucks will be saved w/ a 2 pt limit.. but again its a start and they can fix that in other years... i do wish you all luck...

ORIGINAL: Rob in VT

PA Gobbler,

I agree with you, but how many hunters can really age a deer on the hoof? I would say not many. As you stated, this is a start which can be tweeked each year as needed. If you think about it, an ethical hunter won't be able to see that 3rd point which is an inch long unless the deer if right on top of him. I feel that many legal bucks will walk because hunters can't positively identify the 2 points on one side. With a 2.5 year old, there shouldn't be any question whether it's legal or not.

Last year you could take 3 bucks in VT. Really, the number of second and third bucks taken by a single hunter is so insignificant that it isn't going to make much of a difference.

. . . Rob
PA GOBBLER is offline  
Old 06-21-2005, 01:30 PM
  #14  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Rob in VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Central VT/Big Horn WY
Posts: 1,543
Default RE: Vermont Passes Antler Restriction


I would have preferred to see an AR of 3pt on one side, but I am happy that we have AR at all.

You need to have a little background on the average number of points. In Vermont, a point is listed as a "discernable" point. There was no measurement of at least an inch. The old saying of "if you can hang a ring on it, it is a point" was in effect. The AR rule says that it must be at least one inch long. I think this alone will hold off a lot of people from dropping the hammer.

Still, let's look at a hypothetical situation on an average of 2.9 points. Let's say there are 100 1.5 year old bucks. A third have 2 pts, a third have 3 pts, and a third have 4 pts. This averages to 2.99 points per deer (a little higher than our true average), but I think these are reasonable assumptions. Let's assume that all the 2 pointers survive (33 deer). Let's also assume that half of our 3 pointers survive due to hunters not being sure if that third point is an inch or not (16 deer). Finally let's assume that 5% of our 4 pointers survive (2 deer). If you add it all up that's 51 deer out of 100 that would survive - or 51%. I'll take that success rate any day.

. . . Rob
Rob in VT is offline  
Old 06-22-2005, 06:23 AM
  #15  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Warren PA USA
Posts: 1,512
Default RE: Vermont Passes Antler Restriction

Still, let's look at a hypothetical situation on an average of 2.9 points. Let's say there are 100 1.5 year old bucks. A third have 2 pts, a third have 3 pts, and a third have 4 pts. This averages to 2.99 points per deer (a little higher than our true average), but I think these are reasonable assumptions. Let's assume that all the 2 pointers survive (33 deer). Let's also assume that half of our 3 pointers survive due to hunters not being sure if that third point is an inch or not (16 deer). Finally let's assume that 5% of our 4 pointers survive (2 deer). If you add it all up that's 51 deer out of 100 that would survive - or 51%. I'll take that success rate any day.
Sounds good on paper, but you're not going to kill all 100 with or without AR. I think you said(or somebody said)60% of your harvest is 1-1/2 yo bucks. That would mean out of your 100 you'd only be killing 60 to start with. I'll give you all of the spikes...none should be shot sowe have 33 saved. Now how do you figure in the rest of them?I'll admit that AR's willhelp, but I don't think it's going to be a drastic change.
Jason N is offline  
Old 06-26-2005, 09:44 AM
  #16  
Dominant Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blossvale, New York
Posts: 21,199
Default RE: Vermont Passes Antler Restriction

I really don't see this as an antler restriction. If they really wanted to accomplish something they should have carried it a point or two further, say 3 points to one side. Most of those little four pointers that everyone whacks are 1 1/2 years old. If they'd let them live(and I'm not necessaryily a QDM let-em-grow guy) they'd see some real changes in 3 or 4 years. If those1 1/2 year olds could make it to 2 1/2, a lot more of them would survive to be 4 and 5. That extra year of learning to avoid and hide from man really helps them and gives them a sure enough chance to make it to 3 and 4 and 5 years old. The two point rule doesn't do anything the old rules of One point 3 inches long didn't do.
davidmil is offline  
Old 06-26-2005, 10:16 PM
  #17  
Nontypical Buck
 
farm hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: cazenovia, NY USA
Posts: 2,973
Default RE: Vermont Passes Antler Restriction

I agree with davidmill - its not an Antler Restriction - as we know it.

Its more a legal distinction between a"Antlerless & Antlered"

Its a start - but thats about it.

FH
farm hunter is offline  
Old 06-28-2005, 02:11 AM
  #18  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Jersey USA
Posts: 1,279
Default RE: Vermont Passes Antler Restriction

Good for VT, I just wish they would go to something similar in NJ, even 3 pts per side...
Bionicrooster is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pahunter60
Northeast
463
09-07-2008 06:14 PM
Schultzy
Bowhunting
24
11-18-2007 05:39 PM
BigBuck28
Northeast
16
05-29-2007 10:27 AM
gutshot
Northeast
33
08-01-2005 06:25 AM
liquidorange
Whitetail Deer Hunting
14
06-28-2005 05:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Vermont Passes Antler Restriction


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.