Question Re: Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40 vs Conquest 3-9x50
01-01-2005, 07:12 PM
#11
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 68
RE: Question Re: Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40 vs Conquest 3-9x50
I bought the Mueller 2x7x40 with 11 red dot clicks,$130.00 could not be happier.I have low mounts on my Kodiak ml and will change to higher rings as soon as I can.My sight picture would be better with the scope higher and it will reduce scorching from the primer blow back.
lizzzard
lizzzard
01-01-2005, 09:13 PM
#12
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bradford, Ontario
Posts: 2,205
RE: Question Re: Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40 vs Conquest 3-9x50
Sorry, just needed to correct some things. BTW, a good scope with a 40mm objective is all that's needed for any big game hunting I can think of in the U.S
01-03-2005, 02:26 PM
#13
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shakopee MN USA
Posts: 1,001
RE: Question Re: Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40 vs Conquest 3-9x50
I know I'm too late on the subject really, but I just had to throw my two cents. Pretty much flat out, my Zeiss 3-9x40 is the best scope I've ever owned. The amount of light it gathers in low light conditions is amazing. In early morning/later evening(still legal shooting hours) I can see better out of my scope than I can looking into the woods. You WON'T be disaapointed with your purchase!! I really, really wanted to put another Zeiss Conquest on my .270 WSM that I just bought, but just couldn't spend the almost 800 on the 4.5-14x44.
