HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Guns (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns-10/)
-   -   Inferior Rounds (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns/89005-inferior-rounds.html)

Slamfire 02-11-2005 11:02 PM

RE: Inferior Rounds
 

ORIGINAL: m.t.hands


i have decided i'll keep my wifes model 7 in 260 rem, should make a fine squirrel gun[:-]
I always knew there was a reason for keepin the littlest big game cartridge. :D

BuckMaster7 02-13-2005 09:17 AM

RE: Inferior Rounds
 

It effects the hundreds of hunters that hunt there but since they do not matter and you are aparantly selfish enough not to care about anyone but yourself here are the counties where slughs are illegal in VA.
Goochland, Louisa, Northumberland, Prince George, Prince William, & Westmoreland
How am I selfish? You act like I would take buckshot away.


No I am not going to go to every states hunting regulations to proove you MORE wrong than I already have. When you are wrong you are wrong.
And you don’t need to but my whole point is why do people choose buckshot over slugs? What are its advantages over a slug? That’s right, NONE. NIL. ZIP. NADA. ZERO. I know in New York they’re illegal but I know a lot of people who would like to use them instead of slugs. Why?


It's overkill on deer. It has a long action and is a belted magnum. The recoil would be on the extreme side.
Everything from the 243 on up is over kill for deer.

In other words...... What's your friggin point?
I’ve already given you my point. It's overkill on deer. It has a long action and is a belted magnum. The recoil would be on the extreme side plus when I was talking about the 7mm WSM being the flattest I meant out of the WSM cartridges. No @#$% the 30-378 is flatter. Heck, I could make any caliber the flattest by necking down an elephant cartridge. I win, 50 BMG is flatter. WHOOHOO!!!! No, lets go even flatter. I win yet again. 120mm tank round.


You said the flattest shooting round was the 7mmWSM and you were proven wrong by bawanajim.

The 7 WSM can take all the game in America and is the flattest of all calibers.
You said the 30-378 was over kill for deer. I said anything from the 243 on up was over kill for deer. Again, in other words please make a point here.
The question is what’s your point. A .243 is in no way overkill on deer. A 30-378 does much more meat damage than a .243. It’s not even a whitetail cartridge to begin with. How many people do you know hunt whitetail with a 30-378? That’s right, NONE. NIL. ZIP. NADA. ZERO.


Aparantly you are not able to read or comprehend the text that is on your screne. Not once did I argue that any cartridge should go away including the 25 wssm. AND the WSSM is not the same cartridge as the WSM. Or did you not know this? But facts are facts. A the shorter and fatter the case becomes the more prone to jamming it becomes.
Yes, I knew this, but a WSM has a fatter case than a standard case or did you not know this? Wouldn’t it too be more prone to jamming? Tell me, why did you buy a 300 WSM? If I could remember right, there was a person on this thread who actually had a WSSM and wasn’t presenting bias information.


It’s on the bottom of page 3. Here it is...


Well as the owner of a 25 WSSM I can say its an impressive cartridge, shoots well, fuctions the way its posed to, but it still won't outdo the 25-06. And lets face it, a 100 gr bullet at 3200 fps isn't that impressive. The WSSM's don't really even fill a niche, there are just as good or better cases out there than the WSM & WSSM lines. The makers make them because with enough hype, they can sell them. Remember the 17 HMR, kills anything smaller than deer like the hammer of thor, well most folks who bought one for yote hunting have already went back to the 22 mag. I bought a 25 WSSM so I could deer hunt more effectively with my AR-15. I am currantly building a Long Range rifle in the 7mm RUM IMP.


I will ask again.............
Please give us your list of inferior cartridges. You seem to know so little please show us how little you really know.
It’s actually common sense. The 270 WSM replaces the .270 (Jack O Conner probably rolling in his grave right now :D), the 243 WSSM replaces the .243, the 25 WSSM replaces the .257 Roberts, and much more. Figure it out yourself.


Please tell us where you get all of your information from so that we can also be as wise as you are. "TYPE=PICT;ALT="
I get it from common sense.


If you ever had a use for a 10 guage, you'd know that a 3.5" 12 is not a good substitue. There is alot more to wingshooting than how much shot you can cram into a shell, such as patterning, shot strings. The 3.5" 12is a great for turkey hunting, but pretty lousy on big birds such as canadian giants- it doesn't offer much of an advantage over a 3" and has alot more recoil. The extra weight of a 10 guage makes it alot more pleasant to shoot than lighter gun in 3.5" 12.
The 12 3 1/2 has about the same recoil as a 10. Only a little more. Benelli offers a mercury recoil reducer if it’s too much. Pattern doesn’t matter. It’s the pellets that kill the geese. Steel shot already gives a very tight pattern and it’s a little too tight. Chokes are what really determine the pattern. You want either a modified or improved cylinder choke.


I personally have no use for a 3.5" 12 guage.
Well, then you don’t have any use for a 10 gauge.


It also has about 3000 - 4000 more PSI of chamber pressure as factory loaded. Loaded to the same pressures the difference is squat. Actually, when the 25-06 is loaded to the same pressures as the 25wssm the 25-06 exceeds the velocity by a substantial margin of a 100+ fps. Just like all of the larger magnums do to the short magnums.

Any other words of wisdom you want to throw out here?
I don’t reload so the WSSM is just as good. The shorter action is also significantly stiffer, which improves accuracy. In addition to accuracy, losing 1/2" of receiver translates into other benefits: A shorter action cycles faster for quick follow-up shots and means less weight for you to pack around all day long.

razormatt 02-13-2005 10:23 AM

RE: Inferior Rounds
 

A shorter action cycles faster for quick follow-up shots
I can only assume from reading this little diatribe that you've got LOTS of practice with follow-up shots.

And stop confusing the terms "accuracy" and "precision".

Accuracy has very little to do with the actual firearm and much more about who's shooting it and who sighted it in.

Precision is all about how consistently the firearm can hit the same thing. Accuracy means to hit what you're shooting at. Precision means to hit the same spot every time.

Again, live and let live. Oh, and I've shot deer with a 7mm Rem Mag as well as a 300 Win Mag and have done (not always, but sometimes) less damage than with a .243.

Mind you, I'm a quite good shot and I've got no problems turning a deer's head into a strawberry milk shake. .243 bullets can fragment quite easily (especially at close range, really high velocities on smaller weaker bullets) and then rip into all kinds of stuff on a deer. The 30 caliber bullets will stay together. IF you know how to shoot, you won't ruin much meat at all with a 30 caliber. You'll put a bullet in the head, neck or hit the lungs/heart and maybe tear up a front shoulder that, last time I checked, don't have much meat anyway.

BuckMaster7 02-13-2005 10:46 AM

RE: Inferior Rounds
 

Again, live and let live. Oh, and I've shot deer with a 7mm Rem Mag as well as a 300 Win Mag and have done (not always, but sometimes) less damage than with a .243.

Mind you, I'm a quite good shot and I've got no problems turning a deer's head into a strawberry milk shake. .243 bullets can fragment quite easily (especially at close range, really high velocities on smaller weaker bullets) and then rip into all kinds of stuff on a deer. The 30 caliber bullets will stay together. IF you know how to shoot, you won't ruin much meat at all with a 30 caliber. You'll put a bullet in the head, neck or hit the lungs/heart and maybe tear up a front shoulder that, last time I checked, don't have much meat anyway.
What bullet design are you using? Ballistic tips? I suggest Nosler Partitions, they remain intact. Quit hitting the shoulder. ;)

razormatt 02-13-2005 12:22 PM

RE: Inferior Rounds
 
no more discussion between me and you, my friend.

My daddy is not a super genius, but he's quite wise.

Once he told me:

"Son, only an idiot argues with an idiot".

So, I'm going to stop.

m.t.hands 02-13-2005 12:34 PM

RE: Inferior Rounds
 
i'm fixin to go out back and argue with a fence post, anybody want to join me

BuckMaster7 02-13-2005 12:42 PM

RE: Inferior Rounds
 

ORIGINAL: razormatt

no more discussion between me and you, my friend.

My daddy is not a super genius, but he's quite wise.

Once he told me:

"Son, only an idiot argues with an idiot".

So, I'm going to stop.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that a 7mm magnum with the same bullet design will do more damage than a .243.

I guess common sense isn't so common after all.

Rootsy 02-13-2005 04:54 PM

RE: Inferior Rounds
 
man my 222, 25-06, 270, 280 and 35 whelen AI are all obsolete? CRAP, what am i gonna do now... but danged if the 280 doesn't whack coyote as well as deer like the hand of Zues... but then again i handload :D ... those 7mm hornady 100 gr HP's at 3620 (chronographed) or the 175 Partitions at 2790 really do a no complaints job on just about everything i've ever taken a poke at with them... the Whelen AI is welllll... a helluva lotta lead at a danged good respectable velocity without a whole lotta recoil. I prefer both over the new fangled short stuff... maybe i am just old fashioned...

because really, they will all do what the chubby stubbies will do.. and MORE if i want them to... plus i can walk into just about any place across this big ole world that carries ammunition and buy rounds for just about any of the aforementioned stuff... in a number of varieties...

as another note.. i've seen more deer antlers in one place that were taken with a 243 or 308 over the last 40 years than i can count... hundreds in number... by 2 elderly gentleman, lifelong hunting buddies, one being my uncle... i've been there when a handful were shot with the 243 and helped dress and butcer a few... the damage done by that little missle put me as a young teenager in awe...

if you do some research the RSAUM's and the WSM's are not a new idea... folks like Taylor, Ackley, Keith, and the list goes on and on, knew about the benefits of short fat cartridges and their efficiencies when most of us were sucking our thumbs or not even thought of. This is plainly written in book form and free for all to view...

Personally, i'd rather be OVERGUNNED than under... there isn't a more sickly feeling than losing a wounded animal only to find it days later half eaten by critters or gone to waste... whether due to poor shot placement or just not quite enough internal damage for whatever reason...

The deadliest killer i own is my Ruger Blackhawk in 45 Colt with big heavy large meplat hardcasts at respectable velocities... i like me a BIG hole and i hate having to track :)

Jamie

Ole_270 02-13-2005 05:16 PM

RE: Inferior Rounds
 
Wow, I look around my safe and wonder how I ever got through the last 35 years of hunting. .22rf, .223, .25-20, .250-3000, .257 Roberts, .270 Win., 50 cal. Round ball shooter, 20ga., and a few 12's. Don't know how all those coyotes, deer, and small game ever fell to such inferior weaponry! Someday maybe some people will understand, it' not how much faster it goes, but how well it matches the requirements and conditions. Not every shot is at 800 yards across a flat prairie! personally. I have no need for anything that could make such a shot. I limit myself to 300 at the outside, most of the time much shorter.

Slamfire 02-13-2005 05:18 PM

RE: Inferior Rounds
 

ORIGINAL: m.t.hands

i'm fixin to go out back and argue with a fence post, anybody want to join me
Which will, unlike this troll, not laugh at you when you walk away, shaking your head. ;)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.