Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 kimber vs. remington >

kimber vs. remington

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

kimber vs. remington

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-21-2005, 01:26 PM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 586
Default RE: kimber vs. remington

ORIGINAL: oldelkhunter

They just chamber short mags and short calibers 243 260 308 and 7-08
Say I was absolutely sold on Kimber and still like and know .270, which one of these is closest to .270?
jones123 is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 06:25 PM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 55
Default RE: kimber vs. remington

For me, the real comparison & choice would be between the Kimber Montana & the Sako Finnlite. Now that's a tough choice and I'm not sure which one I would choose. I consider those two to be about the same quality.
swisslake is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 08:14 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Utica,MS
Posts: 33
Default RE: kimber vs. remington

It comes in a 270wsm,7wsm,and a 300wsm.also.the 84 is the standard and the 8400 is the mags.There is about 1 lb. difference.
UTICA is offline  
Old 01-22-2005, 10:35 AM
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,052
Default RE: kimber vs. remington

I agree with Swiss, I prefer the Sako-Finnlight or the Kimber-Montana. BUT I spent several hours behind a 300SAUM Titanium 700 lastyear at a Remington dealer meet. The gun felt equally awesome. I'm can't remember for sure which ones will be intro'ed but some of the 700 line is getting the 270WSM and 300WSM for 05. If not the Titanium this year I bet it will be on line for nextyear. It's a neat gun and NOT anything like the plain jane old 700ADL Synthetic (which aint a bad rifle in the first place if you ask me).

The Kimber just FEEEEELS so damned good tho!!!
RA
RedAllison is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 04:45 AM
  #15  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Utica,MS
Posts: 33
Default RE: kimber vs. remington

What would be a good price on the montana?There is only 1 dealer around me that carries them,and he is asking 1044 for the 8400?Well I guess there is only 1 dealer around.
UTICA is offline  
Old 01-23-2005, 01:10 PM
  #16  
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,474
Default RE: kimber vs. remington

Never had a Kimber rifle but I have never had a bad Remington. Therefore I will stay with them until they do me wrong.
James B is offline  
Old 01-24-2005, 11:08 AM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 59
Default RE: kimber vs. remington

I'd say go with the Kimber. those are nice guns
MaverickAU is offline  
Old 01-24-2005, 11:38 AM
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 226
Default RE: kimber vs. remington

-
gorse is offline  
Old 01-24-2005, 11:50 AM
  #19  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Olive Branch MS USA
Posts: 1,032
Default RE: kimber vs. remington

I've got a Kimber 8400 Classic on my wish list for this year. With a daughter in college, though, I'm probably going to have to sell one of my other guns to make it happen.

I was curious about those "match grade" barrels and emailed Kimber. They sent me a nice reply stating that their barrels were button rifled. I was glad to hear that since the only hammer forged barrels I've had that are worth a darn are the Sakos.
Solitary Man is offline  
Old 01-24-2005, 12:07 PM
  #20  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: kimber vs. remington

They sent me a nice reply stating that their barrels were button rifled. I was glad to hear that since the only hammer forged barrels I've had that are worth a darn are the Sakos.
Totally agree. I wonder who makes them for them? Savage still button rifles theirs too.
 


Quick Reply: kimber vs. remington


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.