HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Guns (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns-10/)
-   -   Move up to 300 mag (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns/86539-move-up-300-mag.html)

chopper69 01-15-2005 08:49 AM

Move up to 300 mag
 
Couple questions. I have a 7 mm mag and a 35 Whelen and am thinking of trading up to a 300 mag. The rifle will be used for elk and moose.
1. Is the move necessary?
2. What rifle would you reccomend? (would like something in the 6.5-7 pound range).
Looking forward to your comments.

stubblejumper 01-15-2005 10:28 AM

RE: Move up to 300 mag
 
Going from the 7mmremmag to a 300win mag will gain you some energy but the difference is not all that great.A 6.5lb 300winmag will however have substancial recoil.

Deer-Slayer22 01-15-2005 10:31 AM

RE: Move up to 300 mag
 
I agree with stubblejumper.

James B 01-15-2005 10:42 AM

RE: Move up to 300 mag
 
I think you are well equipped with what you have. At least where moose are concerned. The Whelen is as good as it gets. The 7 Mag is every bit the elk gun as the 300. Just my take on it. I have used the 280 for both critters and never had one not go down. There is nothing wrong with the 300 Win Mag. I would prefer it by far to the 7 MM Mag. However if you have the 7 Mag and you like it then it will do about anything the 300 will do.

DM 01-15-2005 11:19 AM

RE: Move up to 300 mag
 
I like the 7 Rem. mag. better than the 300 Win. Mag., why? because of two reasons. First i don't like recoil, and 300's recoil more than 7 mags.'s. Secondly, i've yet to see a 300 Win. mag. kill anything better than a 7mm Rem. mag...

I've used them both a LOT on Alaskan game, and in the field the 300 Win. mag. hasn't shined over the Rem. 7 mag. for me!!

If you choose the "right" bullet for the job, it's a wash, so why put up with more recoil??? Less recoil = a gun that's easier to shoot more accurately.

Drilling Man

duramaxlt 01-15-2005 01:37 PM

RE: Move up to 300 mag
 
recoil wouldn't be too bad in that size rifle with a 300wsm.

stubblejumper 01-15-2005 01:53 PM

RE: Move up to 300 mag
 

recoil wouldn't be too bad in that size rifle with a 300wsm
Contrary to what people might have you believe,The 300wsm recoil is not much less than that of the 300winmag.I compared a tikka t-3 in 300wsn to a remington 700 in 300winmag and the tikka actually felt like it delivered more recoil due to the lighter gun weight.

bigbulls 01-15-2005 03:15 PM

RE: Move up to 300 mag
 
Choosing between a 7mm and 300 magnum is like picking heads or tails on a quarter. The animal you are shooting at will never know the difference. The result will still be a dead animal. 24 thousandths of an inch is not a whole heck of a lot to be worried about. 160 grain 7mm bullet vs a 180 grain 308 bullet. The difference at 400 yards is equal to a 17HMR. Not too much huh.

KareImp 01-15-2005 08:12 PM

RE: Move up to 300 mag
 
Since everyone is kind of discouraging you here, let me say it another way.

You don't need it, based on what you have now. Just like everyone else has posted.

However, you should absolutely get it. For crying out loud, why not?!! And I wouldn't stop there - - really, I DIDN'T stop there. Your not gonna get one in your next lifetime, might as well do it now.

JMHO

headhunter300win 01-15-2005 08:26 PM

RE: Move up to 300 mag
 
Had a 7mm rem mag love it, got a 300 min mag love it too.....do you need it- no, but do you want it is what you wanna ask yourself. Personally i dont own a gun that dont let me know its there when i pull the trigger... if you want something to really put a lickin on a moose or elk look at the marlin 45 70 guide gun.. got one last year and didnt use anything else all season.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.