375 Holland & Holland
#3
Typical Buck
Join Date: May 2003
Location:
Posts: 920
RE: 375 Holland & Holland
biscuit jake.... I dont see a problem with that. I have a 416 Rigby that wears a Swarovski, a 378 WBY that wears a Leupold and a 30-378 WBY that also wears a Leupold and dont have any problems with 3 1/2" - 4" of eye relief shooting standing and off a bench rest, I would not however recomend that you shoot the 375 H&H prone or steeply uphill, if you do you might be shaking hands with Mr. Stitches [8D]
doubleA
doubleA
#4
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,290
RE: 375 Holland & Holland
ROFL. Yup. I would not shoot one prone. Actually, after a couple shoulder surgeries, anything in 300 grains or more I zero from the stand position with a heavy duty tripod. But my eyes aren't what they used to be, so I would need glass. Tempting proposition locally on a 375. Certainly, the 375 is not the beating that the 416 Rigby hands out! Glad to hear they work with scopes.
#6
RE: 375 Holland & Holland
BJ I have one 375 H&H. From my experience I don't think you'll have a problem.I haven't fired mine in a long time. Many years in fact. Without digging it out I couldn't even tell you what scope I have mounted on it. I shot all my shots off a bench.My only suggestion is hold it tight.First shot I took with it way back I held the rifle really tight. I was amazed that the recoil wasn't what I had expected.Yeah Right. The second shot I relaxed. It about knocked me out of the chair.It is a fine cartridge. A little to much for most of the North American but it's there if you need it.
Ruger Redhawk
Ruger Redhawk
#7
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,290
RE: 375 Holland & Holland
Ruger-Redhawk, yup it sure would be a bit much for deer and prairie dogs. I would use it for bison cause I eat what I hunt. But that is a long term project. From what I can see the hunts are expensive & I can't strap it on the hood of my compact sedan. Whole family likes the meat, though! So I am scheming.
Never fired a 416 Rigby but one of the local shops is blessed with Ruger Tropical 1H's right now. I think ElkKampMaster has a 416 in a CZ. Maybe he can report on the recoil.
Never fired a 416 Rigby but one of the local shops is blessed with Ruger Tropical 1H's right now. I think ElkKampMaster has a 416 in a CZ. Maybe he can report on the recoil.
#8
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rocky Mountains, Colorado
Posts: 1,964
RE: 375 Holland & Holland
Fireblade & Biscuit,
The basic numbers:
270 w/ 130 gr bullets @ 3100 fps and a 6 pound rifle:
20 pounds energy
14 feet per second velocity
Standard 416 Rigby w 400 gr bullets @2400 and a 9 pound rifle
65 pounds energy
21 feet per second velocity
EKM Elk loads:
416 w/ 325 gr bullets @2900 fps and a 9 pound rifle:
77 pounds energy
23 feet per second velocity
-------------------------------
Perceived recoil? Well....
375 HH is a lot more casual (a favorite of mine), 416's (especially with frisky loading) are not to be approached lightly or without preparation IMHO --- not a gallery rifle.
Regarding 270 versus 416 Rigby....
High school football versus the NFL, regarding the hitting that goes on (on both ends).
Rifle fit and technique are critical.
EKM
The basic numbers:
270 w/ 130 gr bullets @ 3100 fps and a 6 pound rifle:
20 pounds energy
14 feet per second velocity
Standard 416 Rigby w 400 gr bullets @2400 and a 9 pound rifle
65 pounds energy
21 feet per second velocity
EKM Elk loads:
416 w/ 325 gr bullets @2900 fps and a 9 pound rifle:
77 pounds energy
23 feet per second velocity
-------------------------------
Perceived recoil? Well....
375 HH is a lot more casual (a favorite of mine), 416's (especially with frisky loading) are not to be approached lightly or without preparation IMHO --- not a gallery rifle.
Regarding 270 versus 416 Rigby....
High school football versus the NFL, regarding the hitting that goes on (on both ends).
Rifle fit and technique are critical.
EKM