|
Originally Posted by thndrchiken
(Post 3382394)
I have Bushnell Elites, Nikon Buckmasters, Leupolds and one Zeiss. If I had to replace one I'd be buying another Conquest.
|
Leupold Rifleman 3x9x40 on my 243.
|
I like Swaroski just because of how clear it is but I don't have the money to buy one but when I do I will buy one.:mad:
|
I agree!!! I personally think Nikon is where its at...for the money! I mean are Zeiss and Swarvoski better....probably....but when I can buy 2-3...maybe even 4 Nikons for the price of a Swavoski...I mean come on. I'm not rich and I don't have anything against those who can afford a Swarvoski....I'll definitely have one if I win the lottery LOL!! I have a Nikon Omega on my TC Triumph and plan on getting a Nikon Monarch 2.5-10X42 for my Browning in the very near future.----Dr ASUS |
I just got a swift and I'm very pleased.
|
Fixed 4X leupold or weaver K4
|
dollar for dollar you can't beat the Leupolds, I have the VX-II 3-9x40 on all but one firearm I own
|
I disagree with the comment about leupold being best deal for the money. I did a little research on entry level scopes for a guy($200 range) and came up with these specs. these are all 3x9x40
Burris Fullfield II eye relief-3.1"-3.8" light transmission- 95% MOA adjustments- 1/4" @100 yards max adjustment 50 actual maximum magnification- 9x lifetime warranty manufactured in both the USA and Philipines(depends on demand) Nikon Buckmaster eye relief- 3.6" light transmission- 92% MOA adjustments- 1/4" @100 yards max adjustment 80 actual maximum magnification- 9x lifetime warranty manufatured somewhere in asia Leupold rifleman eye relief- 3.7" light transmission- 82% MOA adjustments- 1/2"@100yards max adjustment 56 elevation 52 windage lifetime warranty manufactured in USA The way I see it the Leupold doesnt even fit into the same class even though it costs the same amount. The only reason i can think of is the whole made in USA thing but IMO that is crap. I am pretty sure thats why GM and Chrysler just had to take a bail out from government and are still on a pretty slippery slope. It just doesnt make sense to me an inferior product for the same price its just stupid.:confused2: |
1 Attachment(s)
I just replaced my original Nikon 3-9 X 40 with a Mueller 4-16 X 50 AO. It appears to be a nice scope. Time will tell.....
|
Notice the second hightest rated is "other" !?!?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:42 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.