HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Guns (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns-10/)
-   -   Ghost ring sights, how accurate? (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns/53921-ghost-ring-sights-how-accurate.html)

Oldtimr 10-30-2024 10:29 AM


Originally Posted by Nomercy (Post 533962)
There's no reason that a ghost ring sight should ever be put on a hunting rifle, period.

They're not accurate enough for ANY long range shooting, i.e. you'll be lucky to get hunting accuracy at 100yrds with them, even in a rifle accurate enough to be a 400yrd shooter...they're great for short range, quick shots, really good for shotguns that need a bit more accuracy than beads allow, but on a .35Whelen (assuming levergun) that should be a 250yrd shooter (in most people's hands, that isn't asking TOO much with a scope), there's no reason to limit your range. Stock iron sights are MUCH more accurate than any ghost ring, your peep sight would be a better combo yet, but not as many people like peep sights as should...it's harder to aquire your target, and some people can't get their eyes right for them. I use a peep on a lever action .45-70, in conjunction with a tang mounted ladder sight, it's capable of incredible accuracy, I've shot those big slugs out there to 650yrds accurately enough to hunt deer with. I have ghost rings on a .44mag levergun for cowboy action shooting-shots are fast and at targets only 30yrds+/- away, and it's just right for that, I've got the same gun with stock buckhorns on it and I get slower shots, but accuracy out to 250yrds (.44mag mind you).

At any rate, don't do something stupid and put a ghost ring on a hunting rifle. I absolutely love them for "tactical" shotguns or rifles/carbines, or on say a turkey gun or maybe a shotgun for deer with buckshot or slugs, but certainly NOT on a hunting rifle.

This is the correct answer!

hunters_life 10-30-2024 11:52 AM


Originally Posted by JShirley (Post 4422609)
I am considerably more accurate with peep sights than any open sight. When I was active duty, I hit a 400 meter target from "rice paddy prone" with my M4, using the ghost ring sights, and shot expert at least half the time, which required hitting at least 36 out of 40 targets, from 25 to 300 meters. I have also used GR Sights to hit running deer. When I had a custom .35 Whelen built, I put GR sights on it.

GR sights are inherently more accurate, due to how the human brain works.

John

Funny, my "training days" back in the 80's in the Marines were a good bit different than mentioned above. As in our training M4's did have "flip up" emergency irons but they sure weren't Ghost ring OR Williams type peeps. If our ACOG got busted we pulled it and used the irons. Our M4's didn't have the retarded carry handle (a most ridiculous and stupid design) like the M16's.
But JShirley, You quoted NoMercy but did the exact thing he explained and talked about Ghost ring and Peeps as if they were the same. And I am in the same camp as he about the accuracy differences between the 2. A ghost ring has MUCH to large of an aperture for any type of precision shooting beyond 50 yards on a rifle.

Also, Bravo on digging skills. This post was from 2004!

JShirley 10-30-2024 05:10 PM


Originally Posted by Oldtimr (Post 4422610)
This is the correct answer!

Except it's wrong. There's a reason why national match sights are aperture.

hunters_life 10-30-2024 06:08 PM


Originally Posted by JShirley (Post 4422615)
Except it's wrong. There's a reason why national match sights are aperture.

Again you fail to realize there are different "aperture" type sights. Peep sights and Ghost ring sights are similar as in they operate under the same principle but the Ghost ring is HUGE which is why it is for close range work and works very well for that purpose. But beyond 50 or so yards it becomes quite difficult to hold center of aperture. National match sights are aperture but they are Williams type and most have the target aperture installed which is very tiny.

Oldtimr 10-31-2024 04:43 AM

I was going to, respond again but what is the point is someone is willing to ignore facts!

Nomercy448 11-12-2024 07:04 PM

The guy joined a nearly dead forum to respond to a 20 year old post so he could brag about his use of a 200m sight (so marked, and how he was trained) to hit big targets at 300 to 400m and convolute ghost rings with apertures, and ignoring the post was about a punkin chucking levergun rather than a fast flying 5.56... I know John, this isn’t surprising.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.