300 ACC or .223/5.56
Which would you chose or prefer for predators, hunting in general and/or overall in general and why.
|
Just like RR said, 223/5.56 in either 8 or 7 twist. Reason being that you are able to stabilize the heavier bullets for a variety of reasons and purposes.
|
I personally don't see a purpose for the .300 blackout, unless I were a covert operator that wanted something under 1100fps. For deer, there are better "medium caliber" choices in the AR-15 platform, for coyotes, there's no need for 125grn+ bullets at all, and the slow speeds attained by the Blackout is just silly. 20moa drop by 500yrds with a 125grn pill? WTF? Why?
.223rem all the way. I run 9" twists, usually 50-55grn bullets for coyotes. Never felt the need for a heavier bullet, although I've ran 69-75grn pills for them. 8" twist if you want to run heavy bullets out of a shorter barrel. The only heavies I shoot are from 24" tubes, so getting the velocities high enough to stabilize isn't a challenge. |
.223 / 5.56 with 8 twist
Just the ammo availability alone.................well right now I guess it doesn't matter. LOL 50-55gr bullet is perfect for predators; I have shot them with a .243 using 75gr V-max bullet and it puts them right down, but with considerable more pelt damage !!! |
Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
(Post 4039895)
223 in an 8 twist
RR |
Originally Posted by Nomercy448
(Post 4039920)
I personally don't see a purpose for the .300 blackout, unless I were a covert operator that wanted something under 1100fps. For deer, there are better "medium caliber" choices in the AR-15 platform, for coyotes, there's no need for 125grn+ bullets at all, and the slow speeds attained by the Blackout is just silly. 20moa drop by 500yrds with a 125grn pill? WTF? Why?
.223rem all the way. I run 9" twists, usually 50-55grn bullets for coyotes. Never felt the need for a heavier bullet, although I've ran 69-75grn pills for them. 8" twist if you want to run heavy bullets out of a shorter barrel. The only heavies I shoot are from 24" tubes, so getting the velocities high enough to stabilize isn't a challenge. |
Correct me if I'm wrong but even loaded full up its lacking what you have in a 30-30
|
Probably works great in special ops.
|
Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
(Post 4040310)
I think it goes along the same lines as the 458 socom, designed as a CQB rifle to be fired subsonicly to lessen collateral damage in close quarters hostage situations but performs even better loaded full power.
RR |
Originally Posted by Ridge Runner
(Post 4040978)
yeah, I like my 458, have never had anything take a step after the impact of the 300 gr.
RR |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:42 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.