Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
.300 Mag VS. .308 >

.300 Mag VS. .308

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

.300 Mag VS. .308

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-17-2010, 05:07 PM
  #11  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,186
Default

You probably have all the info you need by now .... but .... I have both. Truly there is no comparison, except that they are both the same caliber.

In my opinion, the 300 Win. Mag. is an excellent choice for a 1-rifle selection, but way beyond what is necessary for deer sized game. It'll handle 150-220 gr. bullets well, with my personal favorite in the 180-200 grain size. I have used mine on white tails and mule deer ... with shot opportunities out to about 425 yards. Not a problem.

The 308 Win. is my No.1 hunting cartridge by choice. I use a 165 gr. bullet. Usually a Sierra Game King or Nosler Partition. Heavier bullets such as 180-200 br. take up case space, and in my opinion lend to less optimum performance. I have used it on feral hogs, mule deer, coyotes and white tail, with shot opportunities from near point blank out to 350-375 yards. I have had zero problems with clean, quick kills. It is primarily about placement anyway.

I have seen recoil charts but forget where or the details. The 300 Win. Mag., pushing a 200 gr. bullet an nominal muzzle velocities seems to me to be about 2X the recoil of a 308 Win. likewise pushing a 165 gr. bullet.
Mojotex is offline  
Old 12-17-2010, 05:29 PM
  #12  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Marlerboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 76
Default

Alot of people complain about the recoil of the .300 mag. Im only 15 and handle it fine.
Marlerboy is offline  
Old 12-17-2010, 05:33 PM
  #13  
Nontypical Buck
 
TUK101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Spokane Washington
Posts: 1,042
Default

You get about 20-30% more power with about 50% more powder being burned and about 60-75% more felt recoil with the Mag over the standard .308. All of this is dependent on the rifle and the load being used of coarse, but it should give you a pretty good idea of where to two compare to each other. The .308 Winchester is one of the most efficient case designs there is.
TUK101 is offline  
Old 12-17-2010, 05:36 PM
  #14  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Marlerboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 76
Default

Whats the big deal with the .300 WSM. Isnt there some science with the way the change in cartridge shape that make the powder burn diffrent
Marlerboy is offline  
Old 12-17-2010, 07:07 PM
  #15  
Giant Nontypical
 
ButchA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8,033
Default

From Chuck Hawk's website about rifle recoil, energy, etc...

Rifle Cartridge.........Weight.....Recoil energy (how hard it kicks).....Recoil Velocity (how fast it kicks)
.308 Winchester.........7.5.........................15.80...................................11.70
.300 Win Mag.............8.5.........................25.90..................................14.00
ButchA is offline  
Old 12-17-2010, 07:21 PM
  #16  
Spike
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 37
Default

I'm not really sure but my 308 is a really nice gun it's a mossberg and has some problems but the 308 is Also high velocity
Cerdull is offline  
Old 12-18-2010, 04:11 PM
  #17  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Marlerboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 76
Default

Alot of recoil diffrence there
Marlerboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.