7 mag vs 300 win mag
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
As I stated, I am in this quandry myself right now. I have several 7mm's and 300's. And leaning to keeping my 300win mag.
#13
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
BC,
So to summarize the 300WM will only be flatter than the 7mm at the heaviest weight?
As I get more into shooting the only think I've been really focused on is drift. Not so much the flatness of a cartridge.
I'm having a 300 WM custom built right now that is throated to shoot the Hornady A-Max at 208gr. It's a really long high BC bullet.
Tom
So to summarize the 300WM will only be flatter than the 7mm at the heaviest weight?
As I get more into shooting the only think I've been really focused on is drift. Not so much the flatness of a cartridge.
I'm having a 300 WM custom built right now that is throated to shoot the Hornady A-Max at 208gr. It's a really long high BC bullet.
Tom
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
BC,
So to summarize the 300WM will only be flatter than the 7mm at the heaviest weight?
As I get more into shooting the only think I've been really focused on is drift. Not so much the flatness of a cartridge.
I'm having a 300 WM custom built right now that is throated to shoot the Hornady A-Max at 208gr. It's a really long high BC bullet.
Tom
So to summarize the 300WM will only be flatter than the 7mm at the heaviest weight?
As I get more into shooting the only think I've been really focused on is drift. Not so much the flatness of a cartridge.
I'm having a 300 WM custom built right now that is throated to shoot the Hornady A-Max at 208gr. It's a really long high BC bullet.
Tom
#15
Typical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: OKC Ok. USA
Posts: 501
Close you eyes and pick one. Either will do the job on any game in North America.
That being said it wouldn't be my 1st choice for the great bears ,brown and polar with well constructed bullets even they are capable of handling even that job. I would dare say 303 Brit and 30-06 have probably killed more bear in Alsaka and Canada than eveything else put together.
That being said it wouldn't be my 1st choice for the great bears ,brown and polar with well constructed bullets even they are capable of handling even that job. I would dare say 303 Brit and 30-06 have probably killed more bear in Alsaka and Canada than eveything else put together.
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Close you eyes and pick one. Either will do the job on any game in North America.
That being said it wouldn't be my 1st choice for the great bears ,brown and polar with well constructed bullets even they are capable of handling even that job. I would dare say 303 Brit and 30-06 have probably killed more bear in Alsaka and Canada than eveything else put together.
That being said it wouldn't be my 1st choice for the great bears ,brown and polar with well constructed bullets even they are capable of handling even that job. I would dare say 303 Brit and 30-06 have probably killed more bear in Alsaka and Canada than eveything else put together.
Couldn't you say this same thing on 95% of the topics on here? But I think these guys enjoy talking about these things.
#19
Fork Horn
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: 5a
Posts: 183
None of those numbers translate into effective killing. All they do is tell you how effective said bullet is at penatrating an object. Bullet construction has just as much if not more to do with killing game as sectional density does. Am I right?
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Larger BC wins. BC take in account wieght, and bullet shape and momentum.