HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Guns (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns-10/)
-   -   handgun for defense while hunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns/332514-handgun-defense-while-hunting.html)

BC Cowboy 10-23-2010 02:16 PM

handgun for defense while hunting
 
All,

I am looking into pistols (difficult but not completely impossible here in Canada) for defense while in the bush... I am looking for something that has some serious stopping power...

I have been looking into the .44 mag due to a lack of short guns available... But i have been reading about the .454 (a variation of the .45??) and getting a little lost, as i can just go to the local shop and get a feel for the sidearm...

What would you guys recommend? Thanks in advance for all your input!


Now i due understand that a pistol is not a great defense for bears... however i hunt on horses a good bit, and so far i have always been lucky with close encounters... but the thought of getting thrown and having no means of defense (other than a good knife) isnt high on my priority list!!

HEAD0001 10-23-2010 04:35 PM

329 PD. But it is a revolver, not a pistol. Tom.

SecondChance 10-23-2010 06:01 PM

Depends on how much you want to spend. If you are only looking for a sidearm for defense and not much sport shooting, get a S & W .500 or .460 will fill any means that you seek. They are a handfull without question, but very welcome if you need it!!!!!!

rgs1975 10-23-2010 07:53 PM

This is what I use. It's a S&W 586 7 shot .357 loaded in the field with 180 grain hard cast lead flat points (different ammo in pic). It's enough power for any predator (4 or 2 legged) that I'll encounter. I guess I'd not be super comfortable with it in brown bear territory though.


Backwoods7 10-23-2010 09:12 PM

I think your it tha right ballpark thinking 44magnum there are many great choices my personal favorite is smith&wesson 629 mountaingun. It's a staneless 4" with a thiner barrel... Also the regular 629 or even a 29(blues version) also ruger redhawks are tough to beat and if your a singleaxtion guy a superblackhawk is as good as it gets.. I'd stay away from the 454 460 and 500's of your new to handguns also if you think recoil may be a problem look into a 41 magnum it's almost as good a 44 with less recoil.

MO-KS_hunter 10-23-2010 10:22 PM

454 Casull all the way, just ask this guy:

http://www.takdriver.com//showthread.php?t=723

Koanbred 10-24-2010 01:15 AM

1 Attachment(s)
If you are specifically looking for a pistol and not a revolver, allow me to recommend a Browning 9mm. It's quite accurate and has a very practical safety.Attachment 13204

jhilde 10-24-2010 04:39 AM

Koanbread---you might re-read the above and re-consider the caliber you are suggesting-----the members have been talking about stopping bears, possibly cougers, or the wrong kind of person----a 9mm isn't nearly enough--------

daleintampa 10-24-2010 06:24 AM

I carry a .38 But Im in Florida. I use to live in Wyoming and when I Hunted there, I carried a Smith & Wesson .44 Mag 629 I think. 4" Barrel double action. sweet gun.

Bears were my only fear there. Here in Florida, Aint to much to worry about so I carry my normal carry weapon.

IndyHunter83 10-24-2010 06:44 AM

I would go with either the 500 sw or 45-70. I was at a gun show yesterday and saw custom revolvers in both of them for pretty reasonable prices.

My suggestion is also to get some pepper spray. I've been riding all of my life and have been thrown more than a few times. My concern would be being dioriented for a second or two and trying to get that quick shot off.

BC Cowboy 10-24-2010 01:43 PM


Originally Posted by Koanbred (Post 3708132)
If you are specifically looking for a pistol and not a revolver, allow me to recommend a Browning 9mm. It's quite accurate and has a very practical safety.Attachment 13204

I have tested the 9mm in the field and was so disappoint in the penetration it had (tested on a black bear carcass) it could have been the loads, but from what i have been reading it would appear that this is standard with the 9mm (if i am wrong PLEASE set me straight) I would prefer a revolver (less chance of a jam up...) but being able to pack with easy is my main concern. I can handle some kick, but i think the S&W .500 and those cannons are not really what I am looking for.

Thanks for all your support!!

So what is the impact different between the .44 mag and the .357?

Backwoods7 10-24-2010 03:57 PM

The 357 magnum is a excelent handgun and I wouldn't hesitate useing it on a deer and maby as backup on a Blackbear but not a grizzly/brownbear.. The 44 launches a 240gr bullet at around 1300fps and a 357 launches a 158gr bulled at 1200 the 44 penatrates deeper has a bigger bullet but dose kick harder but not nearly as much recoil as a 500

98Redline 10-25-2010 03:49 PM

In brown bear territory the minimum you should be considering is a 44 Mag with heavy deep penetrating cast or punch bullets. In a brown bear encounter even a heavy loaded .357 will lead to you ending up as bear scat.

For a protection gun, I would try to stick with a double action revolver such as a SW model 29, 629 or a Ruger Redhawk or Super Redhawk.

A packable gun that you can keep on your person (not much good in your pack) will probably end up with a relatively short barrel 4" or less and will have substantial recoil if fired with full house deep penetrating loads such as the Grizzly 300gr WFNGC.


Not being a terribly experienced handgun shooter you should be wary of going to calibers higher than the 44 Mag (not necessarily avoid, just be very judicious in your decision). While packing a ton more punch the 454 Casull also packs a ton more recoil, especially in a packable platform such as the Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan. Unless you are VERY familiar with shooting guns that dish out this type of recoil they can be extremely difficult to shoot (the followup shots tend to take much longer). Take a look at this youtube video

Another good review of the 454 Alaskan is from Shooting Times (here)

country1 10-25-2010 08:55 PM


Originally Posted by 98Redline (Post 3709069)


Not being a terribly experienced handgun shooter you should be wary of going to calibers higher than the 44 Mag (not necessarily avoid, just be very judicious in your decision). While packing a ton more punch the 454 Casull also packs a ton more recoil, especially in a packable platform such as the Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan. Unless you are VERY familiar with shooting guns that dish out this type of recoil they can be extremely difficult to shoot (the followup shots tend to take much longer). Take a look at this youtube video

The person shooting the .454 Casull in the YouTube video does not appear to know much about handguns. He does several things that are not proper.

I suggest getting proper training. See if there are certified instructors in your area. Also check to see which handgun cartridges/ammo suitable for large bear are available to you. Ruger makes very strong and dependable revolvers. I would go with at least a .44 Mag in double action (stay away from single action revolvers for defense). Be aware a .460 S&W can also shoot .454 Casull and .45 Colt, and a .454 Casull can also shoot .45 Colt. Some .45 Colt ammunition comes close to some .44 Mag loads in the power area.

IndyHunter83 10-26-2010 02:52 AM

The 460 and the 500 seem to be the most ideal to my thinking. I know for a fact that they make a 4" in the 500. The only reason I still recommend it is because its got more power than anything else.

I've used a SW 500 for deer. Its not too horrible to keep ahold of.

Otsdawa_Game_Hunter 10-26-2010 01:46 PM

I carry a Glock 23. 500 rds thru mine and it goes bang everytime. Compact pistol which is easy to carry. Are we talking self defense against a person or bear? If its for a bear then the 454 is my .02!

pnut 10-26-2010 02:14 PM

I would look at how much you plan on shooting this gun.
A .44 mag is pretty costly to shoot even if reloading for it.
I personally prefer the 45acp to wear while rifle hunting .

Bucktail_Bob 10-26-2010 04:08 PM

I would go with the .44 mag
I doubt you will have time to put ears on.
I can handle the .44 with no ear protection if I had to.
There no way in hell I would shoot a .500 .460 or .454 casull without
ear protection.

bb

98Redline 10-26-2010 04:19 PM

I would gladly sacrifice some of my hearing to not be dead.

Pack as much caliber as you can handle.

pnut....when it comes to stopping a Canadian brown bear in his tracks, the .45 ACP would be nearly as useless as a rolled up newspaper.

For most situations, the .45acp is a fine round (one of my personal favs) however it is way under powered as a bear defense gun in BC Cowboy's neck of the woods.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.