![]() |
Originally Posted by CalHunter
(Post 3685866)
Now, as to the "debate" about who is older, I suggest the 2 "older" members settle it at 20 metric paces with birth certificates. :wink::party0005:
|
Originally Posted by CalHunter
(Post 3685866)
as to the "debate" about who is older, I suggest the 2 "older" members settle it at 20 metric paces with birth certificates. :wink::party0005:
|
1 Attachment(s)
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/19pL9R...es/DrSuess.htm
The Cat in the Hat On Aging I Cannot See I Cannot Pee I Cannot Chew I Cannot Screw Oh, My God, What Can I Do? My Memory Shrinks My Hearing Stinks No Sense of Smell I Look Like Hell My Mood is Bad -- Can't You Tell? My Body is Drooping Have Trouble Pooping The Golden Years Have Come at Last The Golden Years can Kiss My Ass! |
i gotta disagree with mr deer hunter,280 is much better suited for elk hunting than the 270.jmho
|
Originally Posted by jdhogg
(Post 3685946)
i gotta disagree with mr deer hunter,280 is much better suited for elk hunting than the 270.
|
I haven't seen anyone getting TOO out of line in this thread...
Nobody has shed the kid's gloves yet.... Yeah.. I know THAT expression dates me....:happy0157:..... One reason I frequent forums like this is for the entertainment value...Nothing wrong with a little give and take... IMO this thread has stayed pretty civil, with a little good natured badgering involved... |
Could always go with a 280 Remington with a belt.. the 7mm Remington Magnum. Same bullets, more oomph. Nothing wrong with the 280. Would make an excellent mountain rifle IMO, as far as being lightweight and having plenty of power. Besides, its bigger then a 270,lol.
|
Actually, Jack O'Connor agreed that the .280 was a better all round cartridge than the .270...In his later years, Jim Carmichel went to him and was discussing a custom rifle he was having built...Jim had already decided on a .280, but so he wouldn't hurt Jack's feelings, he told him he was getting a .270...Seems Jack jumped up and said "Don't do it, go with a .280, it's a better round"...
Jack liked the .270 simply because it shot a little flatter than the '06 and it kicked a little less...He felt that the average rifleman at the time could handle the reduced recoil a bit better... |
Thanks to all of you for your insights and input.
I have considered some of the current production rifles that were mentioned. However, none of them are quite what I want. I don't care for stainless steel rifles (or pistols). I really don't like skinny-barreled mountain rifles either. I just want a regular weight sporter with a decent walnut stock. I know....some of the well known makers made them a few years back. I guess I should have bought one then. I appreciated the thoughts on the 270 caliber. I have a couple of 270's...a Winchester and a Marlin model 7. It's a fine caliber. Just want a new toy to play with! As far as the 7mm Magnum...I avoid magnum cartridges. I owned a couple of Weatherby Mark V's in magnum calibers. Those were some of the poorest shooting rifles I ever owned. I have decided to bide my time...maybe I can find what I want at one of the larger regional gun shows next spring. If I can't, I have a 700 BDL in 30-06 that has a lot or rounds through it. It just might become my 280. Thanks guys! |
Originally Posted by Mr. Conservatism
(Post 3686167)
I have a 700 BDL in 30-06 that has a lot or rounds through it. It just might become my 280.
Best of luck with it. May I recommend Shilen.....? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:10 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.