Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
Need a LOW recoil rifle for deer >

Need a LOW recoil rifle for deer

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Need a LOW recoil rifle for deer

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-25-2010, 05:20 AM
  #1  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pulaskiville
Posts: 3,533
Default Need a LOW recoil rifle for deer

My father (age 76) has had some rhythm trouble with his heart. He had a defibrilator installed in his chest, and all is great.

He is an avid hunter and at our farm in WV he has always used a Rem 600 carbine in .308. This is one hard kicking little gun. It weight in at about 4 1/2 pounds and just delivers a thumpin. It's never been an issue...but now he isn't supposed to have any "sharp" jabs to his shoulder area.

My question is...what gun/caliber combo has virtually no kick and is still a suitable caliber for whitetails....small whitetails. I have a .223, and I've killed several deer with it. He isn't quite the shot I am and I'm a little nervous about turning him loose with that.

I've looked at a 7mm-08, 7.62x38, and .243.

Any help is appreciated...and please don't give me an ethics course on the energy needed to kill a whitetail. Thanks!
Pro-Line is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 05:26 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
charlie brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Crescent Valley, NV
Posts: 2,271
Default

I am not sure how you hunt, but if you hunt from a stand, I would look at the .243 for whitetails. Get a heavier than normal stock, and bump the weight of the gun up to about 9-10 lbs or a little heavier, and there should be no recoil felt at all. Though heavy for all day carrying, it shouldn't be too bad for you to carry to a stand for your dad. I have seen a few deer taken with the .243, some in the 150 lb class, and it handles them no problem.

Just a thought.

Marcial
charlie brown is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 05:38 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Adirondacks
Posts: 1,305
Default

Either a .243 or .257 Roberts.Both have low recoil even with hot loads and both shoot well with lighter loads.I know Ruger still chambers the Rob but many don't.Everybody offers the .243.
Bernie P. is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 07:27 AM
  #4  
Fork Horn
 
adamsdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Conway, Arkansas
Posts: 184
Default

I would also recommend the 257 roberts or perhaps a 25-06. I have a remington 700 with a heavy stock and my wife loves it. You cannot go wrong with a 243 either. Most companies offer them and there is a good amount of different commercial loads that can be found everywhere.
adamsdad is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 07:29 AM
  #5  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
Default

My .243 has a 24 inch barrel on it and there is minimal recoil...I'd also suggest that .223 or even a 22-250 and the 60 gr Partition...

Back in the late 60s I used a 22-250 for population control on our farms...While it killed deer, I knew it wasn't really a deer caliber after killing a few...

About 6 years ago, my younger brother picked up a 22-250 in trade, he remembered that I used to have one so he had me set it up for his daughter (13-14 at the time)...I picked up a couple of boxes of the 60gr Federal Premiums with the Partitions in them...My niece is now in college and has killed about a dozen deer with that gun, losing none and having exits on every one...

Most dropped at the shot to a high shoulder shot...

It would be great if you could find a local guy with a .243 and try it out...If he couldn't take that recoil I wouldn't hesitate to go to a 22-250...
nchawkeye is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 07:59 AM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
robbcayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 1,184
Default

You can get reduced recoil loads for your 308. I believe Remington sells 125 grain reduced recoil that's supposed to reduce felt recoil by 50%.

The real problem is how light the rifle is. If he had a 6 or 7 pound 308 it would dramatically reduce the felt recoil.

With all that said, you might be best going with a 243. It's the lightest caliber I would suggest for whitetail hunting. You can shoot light 100 grain type loads and put on a thick recoil pad. I would venture to say it would be very easy to shoot. Just make sure you don't buy a super light rifle, because they will have more recoil.
robbcayman is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 08:05 AM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
halfbakedi420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: central and east texas
Posts: 4,894
Default

ever think bout just puttin a sled in the blind?
halfbakedi420 is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 08:30 AM
  #8  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 604
Default

I would consider a 6.8 SPC. Its case capacity is just slightly larger than the 223 rem but it hits harder than the 30-30. Max powder charges are around 30 grains max.

Trajectory wise its muzzle velocity with the 100-120 grain bullets is similar to the 308 with a 150 grain bullet. At around 2700 fps it has over 1000 lbs KE at 300 yards so it is a real killer despite its small size. See the link for performance.

http://www.doubletapammo.com/php/cat...roducts_id=285

Felt recoil in a 7 lbs rifle is only 9 ft/lbs for this round compared to 18ft/lbs for the 308.

Last edited by Scott Gags; 04-25-2010 at 08:37 AM.
Scott Gags is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 09:30 AM
  #9  
Giant Nontypical
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default

any heavy rifle in one of the .308 knock offs, I'd look to the .243, 7mm-08, and maybe another .308.
salukipv1 is offline  
Old 04-25-2010, 09:35 AM
  #10  
Giant Nontypical
 
Sheridan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 5,130
Default

.243, 7mm-08, or that new 6.8 spc in a gas gun is your best bet. Be it a classic autoloader or some AR.
Sheridan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.