View Poll Results: Which 300 mag do you own ?
300 Ruger Compact Magnum
0
0%
300 H & H Magnum
0
0%
300 Pegasus
0
0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll
Which 300 Mag ?
#3
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 1,408
Good old 300WM. This is how I see it:
300 Weatherby - PRO - velocity, CON - $$$ factory ammo, ammo availability, brass, recoil
300 RUM - PRO - velocity, CON - Not much choice in brass, recoil
300WM - PRO - Ammo everywhere, versitality in bullets compared to WSM, many brass sources
300WSM - PRO - short action, efficiency, CON - can't optimize heavier bullets without a custom gun
Personally it came down to the WM or WSM. I hate brakes and I shoot a decent amount, so I did not want to put up with the recoil of the larger cartridges. They only give incremental range advantages over the WM anyways, if I need to shoot further I will be forced into getting a brake and would go to a 338 at that point.
300 Weatherby - PRO - velocity, CON - $$$ factory ammo, ammo availability, brass, recoil
300 RUM - PRO - velocity, CON - Not much choice in brass, recoil
300WM - PRO - Ammo everywhere, versitality in bullets compared to WSM, many brass sources
300WSM - PRO - short action, efficiency, CON - can't optimize heavier bullets without a custom gun
Personally it came down to the WM or WSM. I hate brakes and I shoot a decent amount, so I did not want to put up with the recoil of the larger cartridges. They only give incremental range advantages over the WM anyways, if I need to shoot further I will be forced into getting a brake and would go to a 338 at that point.
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
I have owned 4 of those on the list. I have settled on the old 300WM. I can achieve 3100fps with 180gr ballistic tip with a 24" barrel which isn't shabby, and I could never achieve that with a WSM. Barrel life is long, and feeds well.
300RUM's I loved. But I did shoot out 2 barrels in two years. Less than 2500 rounds. And everytime I rebarreled a gun, things change. Maybe not as accurate or mabye fouled more. I might own another one. I still keep my dies.
Weatherby's are screamer but I hate the freebore. hate the price of brass.
300RUM's I loved. But I did shoot out 2 barrels in two years. Less than 2500 rounds. And everytime I rebarreled a gun, things change. Maybe not as accurate or mabye fouled more. I might own another one. I still keep my dies.
Weatherby's are screamer but I hate the freebore. hate the price of brass.
#5
I have owned 4 of those on the list. I have settled on the old 300WM. I can achieve 3100fps with 180gr ballistic tip with a 24" barrel which isn't shabby, and I could never achieve that with a WSM. Barrel life is long, and feeds well.
300RUM's I loved. But I did shoot out 2 barrels in two years. Less than 2500 rounds. And everytime I rebarreled a gun, things change. Maybe not as accurate or mabye fouled more. I might own another one. I still keep my dies.
Weatherby's are screamer but I hate the freebore. hate the price of brass.
300RUM's I loved. But I did shoot out 2 barrels in two years. Less than 2500 rounds. And everytime I rebarreled a gun, things change. Maybe not as accurate or mabye fouled more. I might own another one. I still keep my dies.
Weatherby's are screamer but I hate the freebore. hate the price of brass.
http://www.remington.com/products/am...300WB*PRA300WC
here is a ballistics chart usin a 300wsm and a 300winmag..comparin apples to apples...and nothin here is showin me that a 300 win mag out performs a wsm...unless 50fps is substantial to you....looks to be that at 500 yards that the wsm starts to shine...the 3 top ones are wsm and the 3 bottoms are win mag..and i chose the same bullets avalible fer each gun as to compare..i can find many cartridges that do better than what these charts say fer my 300wsm as well as you can fer your win mag..but apples to apples the winmag and short mag are vertually the same, til ya hit 500 yards and its just as mi-nute as befor 500 yards.. maybe your 24" barrel is all ya have ..im sure there is 1 avalible sumhow, sumway in 300wsm..
after further reveiw looks like 300 win mag only has the lead with velocity under 500 yards...energy and short range and long range trajectory go to the WSM..thx fer bringin this up
Last edited by halfbakedi420; 10-24-2009 at 12:32 PM.
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
http://www.remington.com/products/am...300WB*PRA300WC
here is a ballistics chart usin a 300wsm and a 300winmag..comparin apples to apples...and nothin here is showin me that a 300 win mag out performs a wsm...unless 50fps is substantial to you....looks to be that at 500 yards that the wsm starts to shine...the 3 top ones are wsm and the 3 bottoms are win mag..and i chose the same bullets avalible fer each gun as to compare..i can find many cartridges that do better than what these charts say fer my 300wsm as well as you can fer your win mag..but apples to apples the winmag and short mag are vertually the same, til ya hit 500 yards and its just as mi-nute as befor 500 yards.. maybe your 24" barrel is all ya have ..im sure there is 1 avalible sumhow, sumway in 300wsm..
after further reveiw looks like 300 win mag only has the lead with velocity under 500 yards...energy and short range and long range trajectory go to the WSM..thx fer bringin this up
here is a ballistics chart usin a 300wsm and a 300winmag..comparin apples to apples...and nothin here is showin me that a 300 win mag out performs a wsm...unless 50fps is substantial to you....looks to be that at 500 yards that the wsm starts to shine...the 3 top ones are wsm and the 3 bottoms are win mag..and i chose the same bullets avalible fer each gun as to compare..i can find many cartridges that do better than what these charts say fer my 300wsm as well as you can fer your win mag..but apples to apples the winmag and short mag are vertually the same, til ya hit 500 yards and its just as mi-nute as befor 500 yards.. maybe your 24" barrel is all ya have ..im sure there is 1 avalible sumhow, sumway in 300wsm..
after further reveiw looks like 300 win mag only has the lead with velocity under 500 yards...energy and short range and long range trajectory go to the WSM..thx fer bringin this up
I wouldn't know I don't shoot factory ammo. I have made my own many years as most on here do. I had a WSM in a 26" barrel and still could not achieve 3100fps without serious pressure signs. Longer barrel results in greater velocity. I could easily get another 30fps with a 26" barrel. I myself would rather have a shorter 24" barrel for hunting.
Its fairly known that WSM was hyped with increase of pressure from SAAMI specs. Don't believe advertising hype. Do the tests yourself.
Little tip for yourself. If both guns are shooting same bullet, then there is no way it shines as you say. A bullet has a bullistic coef, and if both are coming out of the barrel same velocity, there is no "shining" as you say.
I am not sure what your trying to say. I am only saying from a handloaders point of view, you can and should be able to beat a WSM and then some.
I have owned quite a few of them, and I chose the win mag.
Shoot what you want.
Last edited by bigcountry; 10-24-2009 at 01:07 PM.
#10
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 1,408
http://www.remington.com/products/am...300WB*PRA300WC
here is a ballistics chart usin a 300wsm and a 300winmag..comparin apples to apples...and nothin here is showin me that a 300 win mag out performs a wsm...unless 50fps is substantial to you....looks to be that at 500 yards that the wsm starts to shine...the 3 top ones are wsm and the 3 bottoms are win mag..and i chose the same bullets avalible fer each gun as to compare..i can find many cartridges that do better than what these charts say fer my 300wsm as well as you can fer your win mag..but apples to apples the winmag and short mag are vertually the same, til ya hit 500 yards and its just as mi-nute as befor 500 yards.. maybe your 24" barrel is all ya have ..im sure there is 1 avalible sumhow, sumway in 300wsm..
after further reveiw looks like 300 win mag only has the lead with velocity under 500 yards...energy and short range and long range trajectory go to the WSM..thx fer bringin this up
here is a ballistics chart usin a 300wsm and a 300winmag..comparin apples to apples...and nothin here is showin me that a 300 win mag out performs a wsm...unless 50fps is substantial to you....looks to be that at 500 yards that the wsm starts to shine...the 3 top ones are wsm and the 3 bottoms are win mag..and i chose the same bullets avalible fer each gun as to compare..i can find many cartridges that do better than what these charts say fer my 300wsm as well as you can fer your win mag..but apples to apples the winmag and short mag are vertually the same, til ya hit 500 yards and its just as mi-nute as befor 500 yards.. maybe your 24" barrel is all ya have ..im sure there is 1 avalible sumhow, sumway in 300wsm..
after further reveiw looks like 300 win mag only has the lead with velocity under 500 yards...energy and short range and long range trajectory go to the WSM..thx fer bringin this up
So sure, if you're going to use factory ammo only there is not really a difference, but the question was about the cartridge and not factory ammo.
You are also correct, with 150gr bullets there is not going to be much of a difference because you can still load the WSM way out and fit it in the mag. But with 180 and 200 gr bullets, the kind a 300 mag is made to shoot and are typically used at longer ranges, you simply cannot load them in a WSM without reducing your powder capacity unless you have a chamber throated to do this and an aftermarket mag (or long action) to fit shells loaded past SAAMI specs.
So with 180-200+ gr bullets, you simply cannot get as much out of the WSM as you can the WM. You can come close in a custom gun, but in a factory rifle there will be a significant performance difference.
Now if we were talking about the equivalent 7mm rounds, the WSM gives up nothing on its long action cousin. But you pay a price in these short rounds when you move up in caliber.
Last edited by spaniel; 10-24-2009 at 04:13 PM.