HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Guns (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns-10/)
-   -   .338 federal (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns/283739-338-federal.html)

cty100 01-22-2009 06:09 AM

.338 federal
 
anyone have any experience with this caliber

TJEN 01-23-2009 07:58 AM

RE: .338 federal
 
Not with the 338fed but lots with the 358win. If you want a gun in a short action thats great not just for deer but elk/moose sized game as well, and with out the recoil of a 7/300mag, but good for 300 yards shots at them all. The 338fed is for you and 98% of all hunting done in the US and Canada.

Silver_Wolf 01-23-2009 08:47 AM

RE: .338 federal
 
Used it this year on elk, 185 grain Barnes-X - TSX. T/C Encore 338 Federal Barrel. Two shots, complete penetration and dumped my elk like a sack of rocks. Shot placement, premium bullet and practice all pay off. I was very pleased with this cartridge. Haven't done any hand loading for the 338 Federal yet but have enough brass now to play around a little with it.

I wanted to try it out on a mullie but work and weather got my deer hunt all wacked out.

The recoil on the 338 federal is very pleasant compared to the magnum's. I have used my 338 Win mag up til this year, when I switched and I don't anticipate going back to my 338 win mag anytime soon after the performance with the 338 Fed.

eldeguello 01-23-2009 11:25 AM

RE: .338 federal
 

ORIGINAL: TJEN

Not with the 338fed but lots with the 358win. If you want a gun in a short action thats great not just for deer but elk/moose sized game as well, and with out the recoil of a 7/300mag, but good for 300 yards shots at them all. The 338fed is for you and 98% of all hunting done in the US and Canada.
I agree here; it is the .358 Win., only better because of the higher SD in the .338" size bullets!

300ultramagshooter 01-28-2009 03:16 AM

RE: .338 federal
 
What gun manufactures offer this caliber?

rafsob 08-29-2009 10:36 AM


Originally Posted by 300ultramagshooter (Post 3238793)
What gun manufactures offer this caliber?


My gun is a Kimber 84m and I love it.



Have not taken it to the field yet, but will this year. I am reloading it an using the 215 gr. Sierra, along with IMR 4895 powder and am gettiing so-so results with it (1.08"). I also have loaed up some Hornaday 200 gr.using Win 748 powder and also getting only one inch groups.

I know I can get better groups with this Kimber and will keep trying.

Has anyone done any better with other powders???

rjhans53 08-30-2009 01:37 AM

Manufactures, Sako 85 (no longer in production but a bunch around), tikka, ruger, Kimber after that I'm not sure. I've got a savage 110 that I rebarreled with a ER shaw kit that's 1 1/8 or less at 100.

Turkeypaw 08-30-2009 10:53 AM

I've been considering buying a rifle in this caliber. Do y'all think it would be a good round for black bear? I would like to make it out west for an elk hunt eventually as well.

Sheridan 08-30-2009 11:29 AM

Here you go.




http://www.chuckhawks.com/338_federal_first_look.htm




Hope this helps

Cub Slayer 01-11-2020 06:19 AM

I know this thread is a decade old, but I don't care. I LOVE this round. Alas, it appears to be on its way out.

So, if anybody out there has experience with it, I'd like to hear about the various, no-longer made guns chambered in it. To my knowledge, only Savage, Wilson Combat, and DPMS still chamber guns in .338 Federal. Most of what I read are old posts back when Sako, Kimber, and Ruger were making them. Surprisingly, I've read a few who felt the Sako grouped poorly.

I have a .338 Federal Savage Model 11. Good gun, but a bit heavy, non-stainless, and not bedded. I was thinking about getting another, and I'm a bit Savaged-out. Yes, I could probably get a custom, and maybe I will, but the occasional used model comes up, so if anybody has knowledge about them, please chime in.

If Savage's new High Country came in .338 Federal, I might have gone for it, but given the stated purpose of the gun, I can understand why they didn't.

Nomercy448 01-12-2020 08:46 AM

If anything’s worth doing, I guess it’s worth doing “all out,” so if you’re necroposting with a thread drift, might as well dig deep! Haven’t seen Sheridan around in a while now, kinda stings on a Sunday morning, and old Cut Throat - man, that takes me back!!!

I’m personally a big fan of the 338 Fed, but it came to market too late; it’s a hunting cartridge which came about after hunting culture was already severely in decline, and it really had no market driver to become a top selling cartridge like the 6.5 Creedmoor - it’s simply a niche cartridge. However, I don’t think I would really say it is on its way out, as it’s far too simple to create, and folks who want one have few hurdles. It might not be a popular factory rifle offering, but it never really was. For gas guns, it’s an AR-10 cartridge in an AR-15 world, so it really wasn’t ever going to stand atop any mountain with dominion. But it slides into a class of niche cartridges which will continue to prosper, drawing batch runs from different makers, and popular low-cost conversions throughout the foreseeable future. It’s effectively the 35 Whelen of our time - very very few manufacturers offered .35 Whelen chambered rifles over the last 30 years+, but anyone wanting one didn’t have to look very far or work very hard.

Brass, bullets, dies, and barrels are and will remain readily plentiful for the .338 Fed. Personally, in the AR-10/LFAR platform, the .338 Fed remains one of the only 3-4 cartridges I find interesting, falling behind the 6 and 6.5 creeds and 7-08. I’ve no use for a 308win AR-10, when a 6 creed or a .338 Fed can be owned.

I know a couple clutches of northern deer and bear hunters in a couple states who highly recommend the 338 Fed, younger-ish guys with enough social influence (not to be confused with social media influence) among local hunters, so I can attest, there are pockets of popularity in which the 338 Fed in an 18” gas gun is viewed equivalently today to the Eastern/Appalachian trends of 30-50 years ago with leverguns in 35 Rem. I’ve made good money in the last ~5-8 years mailing 338 Fed uppers into the frigid wasteland of the Great Lakes region.

For a low budget or turn-key bolt gun shooter, a nut-style drop in barrel chambered in 338 Fed can be bought from McGowen for Savage, Ruger, Remington, and a handful of others for about $450, and installed and headspaced in minutes by anyone with a bench vise. Can’t complain about that.


hardcastonly 01-12-2020 10:11 AM

I've owned and used several similar rifles
in similar velocity and power
358 win
35 whelen
338 caliber/284 case wild cat
338/06
you would not have a dimes worth of difference in the results,
you see hunting large game
if you use a 225-250 grain bullet in any of them,
all are very lethal
and yes they are best used with that bullet weight range

Cub Slayer 01-12-2020 11:40 AM

I don't think it will die, especially with the semi-renaissance owing to AR-10 platforms. I've used the .308 and the .338 on black bears. While the .338 doesn't make them any deader, I've been much happier with the holes for blood tracking.

So far, I've been using the 200-grain Fusions. An engineer at Federal suggested I give their Vital-Shok a try, and was going to buy some. Then, about two weeks ago for reasons I do not understand, the price of this particular round almost doubled overnight. They were like $27/box on several websites, then all went to $45-$50. What the hell?

I also tried their trophy copper at the range. In my rifle, it groups well, but about 2" low (IIRC).

I tried to resist the pull of the cartridge, but CDNN's $400 deal on the scoped Model 11 was too much for me.

Bocajnala 01-12-2020 11:54 AM

I was looking into building a .338-06 off of a Stevens 200 I had sitting around.

Then I realized that question was easily answered with the .338fed.

I eventually ended up with .338 win mag. As it was too good of A deal to pass up.



-Jake


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.