![]() |
RE: Whats better than a Leupold Vari XIII
I replaced all my scopes with Zeiss Conquest 4.5X14X44mm. Sharpest & Brightest scope I could find without spending $1000+ on Swarv. Most of my friends have converted from Nikon / Leupold to Zeiss after looking through mine after sundown.
|
RE: Whats better than a Leupold Vari XIII
I look back to when I started hunting (early 80's) and companies like Zeiss and Swari. seemed to be some of the best scopes on earth, and were, and still are.
These scopes came at a hefty price tag also! I learned to love Leupold as a very good scope at a fair price, considering the above. Just remember the age old saying of "you pay for what you get". Technology has jumped leaps and bounds in the last 10-15 years, and there may be a better valued scope than all 3 from above? I certainly like the Nikons, Bushnell's etc... However, I still love my Leupold's and have them on all my scoped guns! I will probably buy more in the future. I'll give an example from me buying some bino's two years ago, that I would probably employ if I bought a new scope in the future... I went to Kittery Trading Post, in Maine, selected ALL the bino's from the case that were under $500 and went to the window to play with them. 45 minutes later, I choose the Bushnell's (for around $200) over the Leupolds, leica, nikon, etc, as I couldn't see the difference in quality, from my eyes. I may be partial to Leupold's but they still have to prove to be the best value and of course longevity also plays in my hand of decision making. |
RE: Whats better than a Leupold Vari XIII
I like Leupolds VX-III.I considered Zeiss recently but I couldn't find even their lowest priced models for the same money I paid for the 2.5-8 Leuy.
|
RE: Whats better than a Leupold Vari XIII
BigCountry,
I have the exact same problem, plus the outer tube perimeter of the Monarch seems really thick and draws my eyes away from center. I really like the clarity of the Monarch, but doubt I would buy another just for this reason. KEJ |
RE: Whats better than a Leupold Vari XIII
ORIGINAL: ChazyKEJ BigCountry, I have the exact same problem, plus the outer tube perimeter of the Monarch seems really thick and draws my eyes away from center. I really like the clarity of the Monarch, but doubt I would buy another just for this reason. KEJ |
RE: Whats better than a Leupold Vari XIII
ORIGINAL: bigcountry Is it just me, or does anyone else find its easy to loose your sight picture with the nikon monarchs? I know they do this to minimize parralax, but just annoys me some. My monarchs do have some top notch optics however. |
RE: Whats better than a Leupold Vari XIII
As has been said, for the money, Zeiss Conquest is the best optics value, but my eyes like my Swarovskis better. I still have a couple of Leupold VX/VariX III's, but my "low end" scopes of choice are now Conquests.
|
RE: Whats better than a Leupold Vari XIII
Whats better than a Leupold Vari XIII ?
Two or three Leupold Vari XIII's I always seem to come back to Leupold. |
RE: Whats better than a Leupold Vari XIII
ORIGINAL: Bernie P. I like Leupolds VX-III.I considered Zeiss recently but I couldn't find even their lowest priced models for the same money I paid for the 2.5-8 Leuy. |
RE: Whats better than a Leupold Vari XIII
I only paid 339 (on clearance) at Midway.Cabelas also had them on clearance for a little less but they were all gone by time I called them.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:13 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.