HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Guns (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns-10/)
-   -   Question with the .270 (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns/280434-question-270-a.html)

RugerM77.270 12-29-2008 08:08 PM

RE: Question with the .270
 
I have a 270 as my main deer rifle and it doesn't have to much recoil at all. It is plenty accurate and I can shoot over a box of ammo and never get sore if I use the proper form.

kelbro 12-29-2008 08:20 PM

RE: Question with the .270
 
A Limbsaver or Pachmyer Decelerator recoil pad for the rifle and a Past recoil pad for you will make the range sessions much more tolerable. I can shoot 40 rounds of 30-06 full-house loads without a problem.

[email protected] 12-29-2008 08:31 PM

RE: Question with the .270
 
Try sending a bunch of 425 gr hard cast bullets at near 1900 fps from a Marlin 1895, you'll think that 270 is a bb gun, but then this is a whole nother kind of fun!

the outsider 12-29-2008 08:46 PM

RE: Question with the .270
 

ORIGINAL: [email protected]

Try sending a bunch of 425 gr hard cast bullets at near 1900 fps from a Marlin 1895, you'll think that 270 is a bb gun, but then this is a whole nother kind of fun!
I'll pass on this one.

ThatArkansan 12-29-2008 10:18 PM

RE: Question with the .270
 
Thanks for all the input fellas.

Yea, i think big earl put it best when he said this is primarily a gun that I want to use at the range, and it will double as a deer rifle. I have a 12 gauge shotgun now, and I can deer hunt with buckshot or slugs no problem. Most of my usual hunting spots are wooded, so I am limited to a 100 yard shot most of the time. I wouldn't be opposed to going smaller than .270, just seeing as how it will be the only rifle I have for a while, I would rather be have to much gun than not enough.

Doe Dumper 12-30-2008 01:23 AM

RE: Question with the .270
 
If the 12 gauge doesnt bother you the 270 would be a walk in the park. The 270 is one of the all time greats for good reason.

cty100 12-30-2008 05:05 AM

RE: Question with the .270
 
why not a marlin 30 30 like your dad

ipscshooter 12-30-2008 07:56 AM

RE: Question with the .270
 
Here's a comparison of recoil energy for the cartridges that have been discussed in this thread:

Rifle Recoil Recoil
Weight Energy Velocity
.243 Win. (100 at 2960) 7.5 8.8 8.7
.25-06 Rem. (120 at 3000) 8.0 12.5 10.0
.270 Win. (130 at 3140) 8.0 16.5 n/a
.270 Win. (150 at 2900) 8.0 17.0 11.7
.280 Rem. (140 at 3000) 8.0 17.2 11.8
7mm-08 Rem. (140 at 2860) 8.0 12.6 10.1
7mm Rem. Mag. (150 at 3100) 8.5 19.2 12.1
.308 Win. (150 at 2800) 7.5 15.8 11.7
.30-06 Spfd. (150 at 2910) 8.0 17.6 11.9
.30-30 Win. (150 at 2400) 7.5 10.6 9.5
.300 Win. Mag. (180 at 2960) 8.5 25.9 14.0

Superpig 12-30-2008 09:17 AM

RE: Question with the .270
 
If you don't like the recoil of standard factory ammo you can buy the managed recoil loads available. You could shoot these at the range and move to standard loads when hunting season arrives or use the managed recoil loads if the distances you will be shooting are 200 yards or less.

Pawildman 12-30-2008 09:29 AM

RE: Question with the .270
 

ORIGINAL: [email protected]

Try sending a bunch of 425 gr hard cast bullets at near 1900 fps from a Marlin 1895, you'll think that 270 is a bb gun, but then this is a whole nother kind of fun!
............You got it !!!!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:36 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.