huntersnest

no way in hell is that weapon worth $4,500 they surely seen you coming a fool and his money is soon parted

bigtim6656

hey thats alittle much to say to him we aall make mistakes pay to much
we all need to learn the internet is not just for porn anymore

bigcountry

did you make him an offer yet bigtime?

bigtim6656

not sure there a reason so way he will take what i want to give if he paid that much for it
i was thinking about 2500 or so

huntersnest

i never make them big mistakes come on its a .223 a girlish round to start with

bigtim6656

hey the military thinks the .223 is ok
if i buy another ar it will be 7.62 the smaller lenth or .308

huntersnest

sure the military thinks 223 is ok thats because the politicians that make those decisions. are not the ones that have to depend on the very weapons they provide our troops with, i know if i was called back to active duty i wood leave that 223 in the armors cage where it belongs

bigtim6656

i agree i think the military should have a large cal.
I also think the equipment used should be determined at the Pentagon not congress.
If the men and women want a 45 cal handgun give it to them.
If they want a 308 rifle give it to them. ofcorse i think they should use what is best for the job. Even if it is a 9mm or a .223

con10der

If I were spending 4000 or MORE for an AR,It would be a 450 bushmaster,or a 338 Fed or another round that had some stopping power.Certainly not my 6 year oldstwo-twenty-fwee-Wemmy...

RallySoob

Actually politicians don't decide. They were heavily against bringing such a fast small caliber onto the battle fields but time after time the 5.56 had proved itself to be optimal. I use .223 for varmit, predator, deer and self defense.

By the way, your Bushmaster is worth maybe a Thousand bucks. I have literaly 5K into my gun and I know I couldn't sell it for 2 grand if I wanted too. Havea look..