DoctorDeath

LOL ....Paul you never cease to amaze the Good Doctor ....you sure read a LOT into my question ...I never said that a deer was Puff the Magic Dragon "mythical creature"....and I do not recall saying that a high pwered rifle was "incapable" of killing a deer ...however I do take issue that a big buck is not a tough animal ...I would argue that anything that can go through the harsh winters of Canada is a very tuff animal ...again Paul you just slay me ole buddy ...you just GOT to love it

dd

Wilds

Punch Lungs with an X, and "it" will die..................

BigTiny

Looks like a double-bagger.

Paul L Mohr

That wasn't aimed at you Doc, sorry you took it that way. I didn't read into your post at all, I was merely commenting on my opinion of the subject and how strongly some feel against it, not you per say. You really didn't state how you felt one way or another so it would be hard for me criticize your opinion on the subject. There are seriously some that feel anything less than a 30-06 is too wimpy for deer. And in my opinion that is ignorant. I personally feel a 30-06 is overkill for thin bodied animals like deer, unless you are talking long ranges.

I said some "people" not "YOU", sorry you took it personal. I will try and be more clear next time.

You asked for opinions, I gave mine.

Surviving a harsh winter is one thing, but getting shot is another. They are physically no different than we are, destroy the vitals and they will die within minutes, no if's, and's or but's about it. They don't know the difference between projectiles when they have holes punched through their lungs, or worse yet when they get liquefied by a high speed bullet. It's hard to get deader than dead. Deer can be elusive and paranoid, but they are not all that tough to kill in my opinion. I would consider hogs to be tougher to actually kill.

Heck bunnies survive the winter as well, but you can darn near scare them to death.

Paul

SwampCollie

It is certainly a capable caliber provided it is used within its limitations, and with proper bullets for the game at hand. While a few states have chosen to deem it verboten to use on deer/bear, I see no ethical/moral problem with using it what-so-ever... you just have to accept and realize what you are up to... and also accept that there are probably better choices.

I've shot a bunch of deer with a .204 Ruger.... never had any of them take so much as a step.... but I'm not shooting at moving targets from a kneeling offhand position either.... what I use might as well be a vice.

jtb1967

Many of those samepeople feel you can't hunt bear with anything less than a .375 H&H. Too many articles about charging maneaters

Wilds

Lot's of non hunters and non shooters shamelessly spoutin' their Expertitude gleaned via a broad spectrum of skewed sources beingdriven by thepimping of better mouse traps..........is the problem.

BT/DT is a rare breed.....

Deer die easy................

SwampCollie

Yes they do. The problem is 75% of hunters couldn't track an elephant in a fresh snow if he was pissing while he walked. Those same 75% wouldn't admit that perhaps it was their shooting and their impatience on the blood trail that caused the animal to be lost, for fear of not having an excuse to buy a new .300 to shoot a deer with. Moreover, if they'd read an article about being able to kill deer with a .223 and tried it out themselves, you'd have plenty of letters to read in the Dear Editor section of your favorite "Back o' the can" literature.... the modern author always has to proceed with caution and assume his audience isn't allowed to leave home without a helmet on. Shame.

ipscshooter

I don't have the exact numbers here, but, roughly 43 states allow hunting deer with a rifle. Of those 43, I believe 38 allow the use of .22 Centerfires. The argument is NOT whether the cartridge is ethical. The mere fact that the vast majority of states allows it, to me, means that the cartridge is an ethical choice. Thus, the "ethics" question becomes whether the hunter, when using a legal caliber, is sufficiently selective of his target and adequately restricts the distance at which he takes his shot.

HEAD0001

Yes they do. The problem is 75% of hunters couldn't track an elephant in a fresh snow if he was pissing while he walked.



Now that is funny. I do not care who you are. That is funny. Tom.