Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range >

.308 win. or 30-06 Long Range

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

.308 win. or 30-06 Long Range

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-17-2008, 09:19 AM
  #1  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
RugerM77.270's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast Alabama
Posts: 1,625
Default .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range

I am thinking aboutbuilding a custom long range rifle and am debating between these two calibers. I am looking a punching paper at 600 yards or so mainly but would like the option of hunting deer as well if I ever get good enough.

I realize that the militay uses the 308 a lot and its one of the most popular for extended range, but why do they use it over the 30-06? What would make it a better long range contender?
RugerM77.270 is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 10:13 AM
  #2  
Giant Nontypical
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default RE: .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range

Well I think the .308 is more accurate....has been used with some success in 1000yd competitions......

but now which has more energy at 600yds?

Also if you're considering building a long range rifle, I'm not sure either of those 2 calibers would be my first choice.....

may consider a 6.5-284.......but if you long range/accuracy/commercially available for hunting is your goal.....how about a .270? very accurate, flat shooting, plenty of power at 600yds. Or how about a .270WSM....that should be very accurate, beltless, shorter stack....in a quality setup I'm sure it would be.

Or a .300 WSM with 150gr.....though the .270 with 130 or 150 I'd probably take for what you're saying.

But of the 2 you listed, if punching paper is #1, the .308 should be more accurate, but with hunting in mind I'd look at the tables to compare energies, I'm not sure how they compare at 600yds, if the .308 has 500lbs, and the '06 has 1200, I'd be more comfy with the '06 on a deer at 600yds, but of course you have to hit it.....first, so, take that as you will.

Also consider a 7mm-08?
salukipv1 is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 10:23 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Rammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,862
Default RE: .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range

For punching paper I'd choose the 308 over the '06 anyday. Lots better selection of "match grade" ammo readily available, if you don't handload, and noticabley less recoil.
Rammer is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 12:02 PM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
Briman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Body in SE WI, mind in U.P.
Posts: 4,781
Default RE: .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range

Out of the 2, I'd take the 30-06 if you handload, .308 if you don't.
There isn't any difference in accuracy if both are loaded to their potential, the 30-06 would have an edge at longer distances because you could use heavier bullets.

If you are having something custom built, the 6.5x284 is better than either of them.
Briman is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 12:11 PM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
RugerM77.270's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast Alabama
Posts: 1,625
Default RE: .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range

I was looking at the 308 & 30-06 because I don't handload yet. I plan on starting in the future but don't know when, so I was looking for something standard rather then wildcat or $60 a box for ammo.

The rifle will be custom most likely from a remington action. It isn't coming anytime soon. I will begin collecting the parts after I finish building my wife her new house. So right now I am trying to get the design in my head so I can keep a look out for good deals and oppertunities.

I was looking at the 308 because its so popular but the 30-06 is what am leaning toward.
RugerM77.270 is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 01:17 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 246
Default RE: .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range

The 308 has the accuracy edge. If you're just punching paper as you say, get the 308. It has better accuracy potential no matter if your talking handloads or factory loads. Just look at the long range match results and you'll see the 308 has pushed the 30-06 pretty much into retirement as far as a match round.
jtb1967 is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 02:02 PM
  #7  
Typical Buck
 
cjwink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: From Texas but now reside in MS
Posts: 823
Default RE: .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range


308...

Compare the 180 G BTSP for both... At 500 Yards the 308 is at 1815 FPS and 1316 FPe.. And the 30-06 is at 1879 FPSand 1411 FBE.. In fact at 400 yards there is a difference of 108 FPE and at 500 only 95. So the 308 is closing the gap.. The 2 rounds arevery comparable.. You'll get better accuarcy and have better availabilith of ammo in the 308
cjwink is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 02:11 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,293
Default RE: .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range

I honestly believe getting a custom rifle to shoot factory ammo might be a bit of a waste of money. In order to really the see the potential of a rifle of that quality your probably going to have to hand load to tailor a load to it. You might spend a bunch of money on a custom gun just to find out it doesn't shoot any better than a stock savage when using factory ammo.

My opinion anyway.

Paul
Paul L Mohr is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 02:21 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Taking the high ground.....
Posts: 277
Default RE: .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range

7mm balistics are simply better andshould factorinto the "I need a LR Rifle" equation....

Out of those two choices of 30's tho', and the NEED for a 30...I'd have no use for the .308, and don't....and have good useof the '06, and do.

The '06/168 TSX combolaunched fromthe rightplatformis a wicked bastid........
Wilds is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 02:28 PM
  #10  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,195
Default RE: .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range

ORIGINAL: Paul L Mohr

I honestly believe getting a custom rifle to shoot factory ammo might be a bit of a waste of money. In order to really the see the potential of a rifle of that quality your probably going to have to hand load to tailor a load to it. You might spend a bunch of money on a custom gun just to find out it doesn't shoot any better than a stock savage when using factory ammo.

My opinion anyway.

Paul
I agree. Kind of like having Jack Rousch build you a custom Mustang only to have them put a 4 cylinder engine in it.
Simp is offline  


Quick Reply: .308 win. or 30-06 Long Range


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.