Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III? >

Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

Old 04-15-2008, 02:08 PM
  #21  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

Looked at the zeiss, they too make a 3.5-10 and a 4.5-14, yet their z600 reticle which would work for the .243, doesnt come on the 4.5-14, the z800 does, yet that's for rounds like the .300RUM, ie flatter shooting than the .243, not sure the 3.5-10x has enough on the top end for me, the 3-12 would, as would the 4.5-14, kinda wish that zeiss conquest had a 4.5-14 with the z600.

so now I can get a zeiss 3.5-10x44 z600 reticle
or a Nikon 3-12x BDC reticle (cricles which I'm not sure about)
or a leupold vx-iii 4.5-14 B&C reticle.

seems like they're always coming out with what I want/need after I buy something else.

Swarovski makes a 4-12x50 with the TDS reticle, though I really dont want a 50mm objective.

As of right now I think I'm leaning towards the Leupold, though if Zeiss made that 4.5-14 with a z600 I think that would be the scope I'd buy.
salukipv1 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:39 PM
  #22  
Nontypical Buck
 
liquidorange's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,175
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

get the leupy. there is something about there eye relief and glass. when you put it up to your eye its like an old good friend.
liquidorange is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 12:34 PM
  #23  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 590
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

I just bought a Leupold VX III, in 2.5-8x. I did a great deal of shopping and comparisons. I liked Leupold for tradition (I already owned an older scope) and rugged feel. I liked the Nikon Monarch for easy click adjustments, it felt really precise and easy. I liked the Zeiss Conquest for optical clarity.

Somewhat off the main topic, but I hated the Svaroski! It finished dead last in every category I could think to apply in the stores.I also hate their binoculars, a family member owns a pair and I honestly wouldn't give $200 for them. Usually you get what you pay for, but I don't see it with Svaroski.
Dirt2 is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 04:19 PM
  #24  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?

Quite surprised with your Swarovski comment.....I only own 1 swarovski item.....a 3-12x50 PH tds rifle scope, and its very sweet! everything about it is awesome....maybe from model to model they vary?

I'm definitely leaning towards the vx-iii with the B&C reticle, has windage markings.....the zeiss z800 would work with a .240wby quite well, but I'm quite set on the .243 win, so only option would be the zeiss 3.5-10 with the z600 or the Nikon, I may checkout the nikon, see what I think of those circles.....


salukipv1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
robbcayman
Optics
17
08-29-2008 01:14 AM
salukipv1
Optics
8
05-21-2008 02:30 AM
Kirch
Optics
11
10-29-2007 07:32 AM
losthwy
Bowhunting
3
07-22-2007 03:24 PM
BOWHUNTERCOP
Firearm Review Forum
13
12-25-2004 02:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Quick Reply: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.