9mm vs 40
#1
Spike
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 55
9mm vs 40
i've been thinking of buying either a 9mm or a 40cal pistol but not really sure which one i should go with. i will basiclly only be using it as a plink/practice gun but may some time in the future get a permit to carry. i'm leaning more towards a 9mm just for the fact that it will be cheaper to shoot. it will also probably be a S&W Sigma even though reviews on them are back and forth.
#2
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Warren County NJ USA
Posts: 3,899
RE: 9mm vs 40
Overall I would go with the .40 S&W over the 9mm, you can buy bulk ammo for plinking/practice, that is what I do, but being a law enforcement officer off duty I carry a GLOCK 23, .40 S&W, 180gr. Winchester Suprems SXTs......Stay away from that Sigma......
#4
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: currently Fort Drum, NY
Posts: 3,677
RE: 9mm vs 40
ORIGINAL: BOWHUNTERCOP
Overall I would go with the .40 S&W over the 9mm, you can buy bulk ammo for plinking/practice, that is what I do, but being a law enforcement officer off duty I carry a GLOCK 23, .40 S&W, 180gr. Winchester Suprems SXTs......Stay away from that Sigma......
Overall I would go with the .40 S&W over the 9mm, you can buy bulk ammo for plinking/practice, that is what I do, but being a law enforcement officer off duty I carry a GLOCK 23, .40 S&W, 180gr. Winchester Suprems SXTs......Stay away from that Sigma......
#5
RE: 9mm vs 40
I prefer the .40 S&W, mainly because the department I work for issues .40 Beretta's. When I'm off duty I carry a Glock 27(.40 S&W). The 9mm will be a little cheaper to practice with and is also a very effective self defense round.
#6
RE: 9mm vs 40
For self defense, I prefer a big slow moving round, sacrificing quanitity for quality in shots over a mid size projectile moving at high velocity with a large mag capacity. Don't get me wrong, there are some good 9MM self defense loads out there, I just prefer a bigger bullet. As far as cost of practice rounds, only the .22 rimfire will becheaper to shoot than the 9MM. Ultimately it really depends on how comfortable you are shooting the gun, it doesn't matter what gun or round you use; if your not comfortable shooting it, you won't hit squat.
#7
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,290
RE: 9mm vs 40
As far as carrying goes, I have not heard of any problems with bullet performance on the 40 but I am aware of many with the 9. So saying, I do have a 9 myself and it is fun and economical to shoot.
#9
RE: 9mm vs 40
If it's for practice / play then a 9mm.
If it may be used in conjuction with archery, like for bear protection, go with the .40
I prefer Dirty Harry's gun...
Ruger Super Redhawk .44mag. 10" s.s. open sights, drops deer dead out to 60 yards
If it may be used in conjuction with archery, like for bear protection, go with the .40
I prefer Dirty Harry's gun...
Ruger Super Redhawk .44mag. 10" s.s. open sights, drops deer dead out to 60 yards
#10
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,837
RE: 9mm vs 40
ORIGINAL: BOWHUNTERCOP
Stay away from that Sigma......
Stay away from that Sigma......