Porting VS Muzzle Break
#31
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
I can handle the recoil, I just don't like it.
put a brake on my 300RUM, and it did effect the point of impact. It made it more consistent, because I lost my flinch.
#32
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
ORIGINAL: stubblejumper
By your own admission you flinched when firing the 300RUM.I don't consider that "handling the recoil".
I can handle the recoil, I just don't like it.
put a brake on my 300RUM, and it did effect the point of impact. It made it more consistent, because I lost my flinch.
#33
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
The use of brake to tame recoil due to shootibility is a personal judgement call. I personally will not use a brake rifle due to the increased noise directed at the shooter and those nearby.For me if I can't shoot it unbraked I simply don't. Again strictly my personal judgement/opinion.
#34
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
When you don't see me respond, it's because I'm to busy laughing at you!
#35
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
ORIGINAL: stubblejumper
You should be laughing at yourself for contradicting your own statements in your posts.First you say that you can handle the recoil,then you say that it makes you flinch.You aren't doing yourself any favors with your choice of words.
When you don't see me respond, it's because I'm to busy laughing at you!
#36
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
I come on here to have fun and to see if I can't learn a little something. You come on here to pick people apart and to show off what you think you know.
#37
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 179
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
Wow guys this is getting intense may i sugest that we all take it down a notch and just calm down. Theres no need to get all mad at eachother we're all here to learn; everyone has different opinions and every one is just as helpful as the next.
Thanks
-Deric
Thanks
-Deric
#38
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
ORIGINAL: Colorado Luckydog
I put a brake on my 300RUM, and it did effect the point of impact. It made it more consistent, because I lost my flinch. I plan on putting a brake on my 375 H&H before I start shooting it for the same reason. I dissagree with the statement, if you have to put a brake on it , your shooting to much gun. I can handle the recoil, I just don't like it. Nothing wrong with a brake in my opinion!
I put a brake on my 300RUM, and it did effect the point of impact. It made it more consistent, because I lost my flinch. I plan on putting a brake on my 375 H&H before I start shooting it for the same reason. I dissagree with the statement, if you have to put a brake on it , your shooting to much gun. I can handle the recoil, I just don't like it. Nothing wrong with a brake in my opinion!
They are very useful sometimes. I have one on my 7mm Rem Mag, it didn't kick much before, but now its a joy to shoot. And you should wear hearing protection whether your shooting a breaked gun or not, so I don't really see the compliant on noise...
#39
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
And you should wear hearing protection whether your shooting a breaked gun or not, so I don't really see the compliant on noise...
#40
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
I never installed a brake yet. I can "handle" my 7.5-pound .45/70 with a load that generates over 2200 FPS with a 400-grain bullet, but I don't LIKE to! I have considered a brake for that rifle. But I am not sure just how much recoil I'd lose, because the majority of that recoil comes from the weight of the bullet, not the jet effect of the gases at the muzzle. I have a .416 Rigby that had a brake on it when I bought it, and I have left it there. But it makes the rifle less handy, for sure. Don't know what it'd feel like without the brake!