Porting VS Muzzle Break
#22
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
Yup, Your the expert I'm just a dummy. LOL
#23
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
ORIGINAL: bobfm10350
What are the Advantages and disadvantages of porting vs a muzzle break?
Thanks
~Deric
What are the Advantages and disadvantages of porting vs a muzzle break?
Thanks
~Deric
When a bullet exits the muzzle, one hears the release of the high-pressure gas and the supersonic crack of the bullet. A muzzle brake cannot create any sound in addition to this. What it does is redirect the powder gases (muzzle blast)to the rear, right into the ears of bystanders and the shooter. The effect is that the report APPEARS to be louder to the shooter than it would if the blast was directed away from the shooter toward the target. There is no additional noise, however!! The higher the pressure of the cartridge in use, the worse this muzzle blast effect is!
#24
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
ORIGINAL: stubblejumper
The extreme noise from a braked rifle can cause a flinch as easily as recoil can.
Since im a kid im not as "beastly" as you guys when it comes to handling recoil and it just makes me a more confident shooter when i have a muzzle break.
#25
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
"My 7 mag doesn't need a brake" Neither does mine, nor does my .375 H&H. But I have a 7.5-pound Ruger No. 1 .45/70 that could use one with my "bearload", anyway, and I have a .416 Rigby that has one on it. I don't know what that rifle'd feel like if I shot it w/o the brake. I haven't been successful in just unscrewing the thing, so I've left it alone..Wouldn't want to damage it, then find out I need the thing!
#26
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
ORIGINAL: stubblejumper
I have enough experience with muzzle brakes to know that they can change the point of impact.Apparently you don't.
Yup, Your the expert I'm just a dummy. LOL
#28
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
ORIGINAL: glockman55
It could affect it if when closed gases applied pressure on the bullet that wouldn't be applied if the brake were open. I could see it happening if where the ports are, there are slight escutcheons caused by the ports when closed. Meaning if the inside of the end of the barrel isn't flat and smooth it can cause air disturbances while the bullet is exiting the barrel. The smoother the interior of the barrel is when closed the less chance for disruption.
Other than that I could see a change in harmonics at the end of the barrel.
It could affect it if when closed gases applied pressure on the bullet that wouldn't be applied if the brake were open. I could see it happening if where the ports are, there are slight escutcheons caused by the ports when closed. Meaning if the inside of the end of the barrel isn't flat and smooth it can cause air disturbances while the bullet is exiting the barrel. The smoother the interior of the barrel is when closed the less chance for disruption.
Other than that I could see a change in harmonics at the end of the barrel.
#29
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Posts: 5,667
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
I have one rifle with the brake on it, so that's my experence.
Even so,turning off the brake can effect the point of impact,so the gun must be sighted in with the brake off,or removed,if you intend to hunt with the brake off.
#30
RE: Porting VS Muzzle Break
I put a brake on my 300RUM, and it did effect the point of impact. It made it more consistent, because I lost my flinch. I plan on putting a brake on my 375 H&H before I start shooting it for the same reason. I dissagree with the statement, if you have to put a brake on it , your shooting to much gun. I can handle the recoil, I just don't like it. Nothing wrong with a brake in my opinion!