Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 homeprotection >

homeprotection

Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

homeprotection

Old 12-07-2007, 10:01 PM
  #71  
Spike
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 59
Default RE: homeprotection

I also prefer a shotgun for home defense, I use a pistol for concealed carry.
NightFire is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 10:59 PM
  #72  
Super Moderator
 
CalHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 18,390
Default RE: homeprotection

ORIGINAL: spike76

what would be a good handgun for home protection
One that you are able to shoot well, can find and operate safely in the middle of the night when it's dark and can prevent any kids or other people in your house from accessing and using unsafely. Everybody (me included) has the weapon we prefer and are willing to bet our lives on in a self defense situation. You are the only one who can accurately determine which gun works best for you.

FWIW, I personally prefer a Glock .40 caliber pistol because it's what I've carried as a duty pistol for the last 17 years. You might prefer a revolver. Whichever gun you choose should be one that you can safely and effectively defend yourself with and still find a means to prevent any kids in the house from getting access to it.

Although different states might have different laws about when you can and can't use deadly force (like shooting your gun at another person), in most states you are allowed to defend your life or another's life from imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. Normally that means a person who is going to assault you with some kind of weapon and you are likely to get killed or seriously injured if you don't use your firearm to shoot them.

LE does train to shoot center mass (in the chest) unless center mass hits aren't stopping the threat or the person is obviously wearing body armor that would stop your firearm caliber. In that case, LE teaches cops to switch to a head shot(s) to stop the threat.

Just about any reputable police academy and any creditable Law Enforcement training is going to train cops to shoot to stop the threat of imminent death or serious bodily harm. Once that threat has been stopped, you don't continue to shoot the person.

The idea that shooting a person till they die (as opposed to stopping when they are no longer a threat) will somehow prevent a lawsuit completely ignores the fact that any family members of that suspect will likely file a lawsuit if they can prove you continued shooting the person after they were no longer a threat. Just about any time you shoot another person (whether they live or die), you can rest assured that some LE agancy, District Attorney or Grand Jury is going to have to conduct an investigation and determine if your shooting was legal and/or justified.

Hope this helps some. Good luck in your decision and be safe.


CalHunter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.